Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Kobe Bryant killed in S76 crash

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Kobe Bryant killed in S76 crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Jan 2020, 02:46
  #161 (permalink)  
See and avoid
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 687
Received 33 Likes on 20 Posts
"Helicopter diverted from usual route"
"Kobe Bryant’s final flight, minute by minute"
https://www.latimes.com/sports/liveb...h-in-calabasas



(Matt Stiles & Priya Krishnakumar / Los Angeles Times)
visibility3miles is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2020, 02:49
  #162 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Highland, UT
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To me this looks like something that could be explained by a medical incident. They were on track before a sudden hard left deviation. Also supporting that is the crash came right after the ATC controller advised they were too low for flight following, however, that ATC controller had asked a question seconds earlier that went unanswered by the pilot. After several seconds of no answer he just goes ahead and tells him that he can't get following. So there is some reason a previously quickly responding pilot did not respond to the last questions asked. Either work overload or medical problem.
devlspawn is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2020, 02:56
  #163 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Here's today's NTSB briefing near the scene.

Board Member Jennifer Homendy described the holding and special VFR clearances for the accident flight. She said that shortly before the crash the pilot said he was climbing to avoid a cloud layer. When ATC asked what the pilot planned to do there was no reply. The helicopter was observed climbing to 2300 feet MSL and then making a left descending turn to impact with terrain. The impact crater was at 1085 feet elevation. The debris field is 500-600 feet long on both sides of a hill.

There was no FDR or CVR and they were not required to be installed. An iPad with Foreflight was recovered and possibly more personal electronic devices will be available for analysis. The FBI is on scene strictly to assist in gathering perishable evidence, there is no criminal investigation.

Ms. Homendy clarified that when the controller said that the aircraft was too low for flight following it meant that they were too low for ATC to provide flight following assistance, not presumably too low for terrain avoidance.

She said that she's very confident that the NTSB will determine the cause of the accident.



Last edited by Airbubba; 28th Jan 2020 at 16:57.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2020, 03:31
  #164 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Brantisvogan
Posts: 1,033
Received 57 Likes on 37 Posts
Originally Posted by Indelible Spirit
Well, here are positive quotes from those who knew the pilot, per NYT article:“Pilots who gathered at the school on Monday declined to give their names but described [PILOT] as an experienced and meticulous operator. They said they were perplexed by the accident.

“Super cautious, super smart,” one of the instructors said. “I can’t see him making this kind of mistake.”
Everyone makes mistakes, even nice guys.
If only errors of judgment were just made by a-holes, it would be so much easier to spot and prevent.
Many of us have lost people to accidents who we loved, trusted and respected and still can't fathom how it could have possibly happened to them.
Bell_ringer is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2020, 04:52
  #165 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
More about the pilot from today's LA Times article on the victims (who have not been officially identified by the LA Medical Examiner-Coroner's Office).

[redacted]When flight student Darren Kemp heard that Kobe Bryant had died in a helicopter crash, his heart sank. He knew that his flight teacher, [redacted], was Bryant’s private pilot.

“He doesn’t let anyone else fly him around but [redacted],” Kemp said.

Kemp recalled [redacted] as a dedicated, caring instructor who wanted to help his students succeed. A video that Kemp filmed in the cockpit showed [redacted] in sunglasses and a mint-green headset, grinning and doing a mock salute at the camera.

When Kemp got divorced, he said, [redacted] helped him through it. When Kemp felt like dropping out, [redacted] encouraged him, telling him: “If you love this, then nothing will stop you.”

“It turns out, he was right,” Kemp said.

[redacted] was a veteran pilot, well-versed in the topography and weather patterns of the Los Angeles basin, said colleague Kurt Deetz, who with [redacted] flew Bryant from 2014 to 2016.

He was reliable and not known for risky flying, said Deetz, who knew him as “Big [redacted].”

“He loved calling himself that,” Deetz said. “He wasn’t big.”

[redacted], he said, “was the type of guy you’d call at 3 a.m. with a problem — anything, this or that — and he’d help you out.”

Even though poor weather forced him to swing northeast of his usual flight path, Sunday’s route — from John Wayne Airport to Camarillo — would have been very familiar to [redacted], Deetz said.

“It wasn’t a question of him not knowing the neighborhood,” he said.
https://www.latimes.com/california/s...-crash-victims
Airbubba is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2020, 05:17
  #166 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Brantisvogan
Posts: 1,033
Received 57 Likes on 37 Posts
The names have been released and are widely available in the media, what’s the point redacting it?
Bell_ringer is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2020, 05:41
  #167 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Bell_ringer
The names have been released and are widely available in the media, what’s the point redacting it?
As SASless posted earlier:

Originally Posted by SASless
Folks.....now is not the time to be posted names of those lost in this tragedy.

How about showing some courtesy and deleting your posts until the family and friends have time to learn of the loss of their family and friends through official means.
Apparently he had one of the mods remove a couple of my posts that named a famous Island Express pilot who wasn't on the helo. I wrote him a note telling him what I thought of that but decided not to send it.

Since none of the victims have been officially identified according to the coroner I guess that we just have to pretend until SASless gives his blessing. Not that there's anything wrong with that, Danny's trainset etc., etc., etc...
Airbubba is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2020, 06:23
  #168 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just wanted to to share this article from NYMag, as it is well-written, contains a plausible and comprehensive possible explanation:
(Including comments about the decision not to switch to IFR, the apparent 180 just before the crash, etc)

/intelligencer/2020/01/kobe-bryants-helicopter-likely-succumbed-to-common-danger.html

(I'm not allowed to post links yet, so add nymag . com to the beginning, minus the spaces).
JetStudent is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2020, 07:03
  #169 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,325
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
BD - there is a place for condolences but this is a professional pilot forum with a discussion about how a fellow professional pilot came to grief on a Californian hillside - it is important because when good guys make errors, it sends a strong message to the rest of us never to drop our standards or take those extra risks.

Lawprof - that 'expert witness' was very sure the helicopter was hovering or flying very slowly - not consistent with the debris field at the accident site.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2020, 07:26
  #170 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Lawprof
As a teacher of the law and attorney, don't know I've ever seen a more competent, thorough eyewitness this side of a professional, such as a law enforcement officer. This guy's either the best BSer I've ever seen or the best layman eyewitness I've ever seen.
Originally Posted by [email protected]
Lawprof - that 'expert witness' was very sure the helicopter was hovering or flying very slowly - not consistent with the debris field at the accident site.
Not consistent with the ADS-B data or the information released at the Monday NTSB briefing either. But probably an honest account of what he heard, he admits that he didn't see much prior to the crash. Maybe the helo was in a hover before it lost control and plummeted.

It's been explained to me by an adjunct law professor (kinda like a pilot who is a 'consultant' ) that it doesn't matter that much whether expert testimony is correct. It matters whether the testimony is persuasive to a judge and jury.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2020, 07:28
  #171 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bell_ringer
The names have been released and are widely available in the media, what’s the point redacting it?
Because it does not bring anything to the story . If you knew personally the guy , you know it was him already , if you did not, like 99,9% of readers here, what is the point ?

What is far more interesting in the NTSB briefing is the fact that they retrieved an iPad with fore flight on it , so that may act as a mini FDR as far as parameters are concerned , and a mention that the last recording show a 4000f/min drop, whether that is a recording aberration or a fact would probably be the focus of the investigation as it could perhaps indicate a mechanical failure.
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2020, 07:29
  #172 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Brantisvogan
Posts: 1,033
Received 57 Likes on 37 Posts
Originally Posted by Bravo Delta
I Disagree it was a bad place at a bad time - are you saying the lost pilot had no standards ?
He said no such thing. Good people die far too often in preventable accidents. It could happen to any of us, the day you think otherwise is when the holes start lining up.
We would all like to believe that in fatal accidents something catastrophic and outside of their control occurred. As unpalatable as it is to accept, that is rarely the case.
Fully operational aircraft, operating within minima, do not leave smoking holes in the ground and large debris fields.

Perhaps more information will come to light, but without flight recorders and telemetry from SSR and ground receivers, all you are left with is inaccurate low level data from FR24.
Anyone that isn't emotionally connected to the occupants would be hard-pressed to consider this anything other than another avoidable weather related accident.
Bell_ringer is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2020, 07:44
  #173 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Brantisvogan
Posts: 1,033
Received 57 Likes on 37 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
Lawprof - that 'expert witness' was very sure the helicopter was hovering or flying very slowly - not consistent with the debris field at the accident site.
I don't think you need a PHD to distinguish between an aircraft operating overhead or one transiting at 180kts.
Helicopters produce sound in a somewhat asymmetrical manner, without seeing it you'd have to have some talent to work out which way it was facing and how fast it was moving.
Even the best eyewitnesses are unreliable, let alone an earwitness.
Bell_ringer is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2020, 08:55
  #174 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,959
Received 22 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by JetStudent
Just wanted to to share this article from NYMag, as it is well-written,
It might seem like that to a layman but it's not actually that accurate:

"A trained pilot can stay right-side up by paying attention to the instruments on his panel. But at low altitude over Calabasas, Bryant’s pilot also had another problem. He knew that the ground ahead was rising, and he couldn’t see it. To avoid hitting it, he could keep climbing, and hope that he’d gain altitude faster than the ground underneath him. Or he could slow to a stop and descend vertically until he popped out of the bottom of the cloud."

No, he couldn't. If he had
tried to decelerate to a hover whilst IMC, he would have had some serious aircraft stability issues.
Bravo73 is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2020, 09:34
  #175 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Devon
Age: 69
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've seen what a seagull can do to a windscreen in the past, and after checking on the Californian wildlife there are some very large geese in California.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o..._of_California
Did any locals see any large birds in that area which may have caused a crash, or may have caused a medical incident if there had been a strike?

If the pilot knew the area well he would have known the heights of the surrounding terrain, and I would be surprised he descended so fast while IMC?. Seems odd he was climbing to then make a steep 4000ft/min descent from what I read above?
How old was the pilot? If he did have a heart attack or other medical problem would the post mortem find the evidence after a crash fire?
Cabby is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2020, 09:47
  #176 (permalink)  
ddd
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Paradise
Age: 61
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jimmy Kimmel Remembers Kobe Bryant


Jimmy Fallon Remembers Kobe Bryant

ddd is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2020, 09:55
  #177 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London/Atlanta
Posts: 446
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Cabby

How old was the pilot? If he did have a heart attack or other medical problem would the post mortem find the evidence after a crash fire?
In accidents as severe as this medical evidence is difficult to obtain and is normally recognised as inconclusive and in this accident probably has nothing to do with the fire.
nomorehelosforme is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2020, 09:56
  #178 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did any locals see any large birds in that area which may have caused a crash, or may have caused a medical incident if there had been a strike?
Birds do not normally fly in fog.
One thing from the "perfect witness" testimony posted earlier; it is not because he could not see the helicopter above him that it was IMC in fog. It could have been above it, VMC , and the hill side could have been obscured ( Mt Erebus syndrome for those old enough to remember)
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2020, 10:19
  #179 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bedford, UK
Age: 70
Posts: 1,319
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Bravo73
It might seem like that to a layman but it's not actually that accurate:

"A trained pilot can stay right-side up by paying attention to the instruments on his panel. But at low altitude over Calabasas, Bryant’s pilot also had another problem. He knew that the ground ahead was rising, and he couldn’t see it. To avoid hitting it, he could keep climbing, and hope that he’d gain altitude faster than the ground underneath him. Or he could slow to a stop and descend vertically until he popped out of the bottom of the cloud."

No, he couldn't. If he had
tried to decelerate to a hover whilst IMC, he would have had some serious aircraft stability issues.
As a layman that's exactly what I would have assumed. Is it possible you could explain without undue effort?
Mr Optimistic is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2020, 10:38
  #180 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,959
Received 22 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Optimistic
As a layman that's exactly what I would have assumed. Is it possible you could explain without undue effort?
No problem at all.

Helicopters, like aeroplanes, maintain a degree of stability due to the airflow passing over their aerofoil surfaces. For an aeroplane, the lack of airflow over the wing will lead to stalling (and severe instability). The lack of airflow over a rotor disk won't lead to a stall in the same sense but the aircraft becomes much less stable and relatively harder to control.

Therefore, all IFR rated helicopters have a Minimum IF speed (ie a minimum speed that must be maintained whilst in IMC. Depending on the type, this is normally 50 to 60kts. I don't know that the VMinI speed for a S76B is though, I'm afraid).
Bravo73 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.