Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

UH-1H missing from Coffs Harbour 6th Sept 2019

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

UH-1H missing from Coffs Harbour 6th Sept 2019

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Oct 2019, 00:13
  #141 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: OZ
Posts: 281
Received 19 Likes on 5 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by [email protected]
Some people seem very sensitive about having their precious CASA questioned - I thought Aussie were supposed to be thick skinned and laid-back

don't go confusing sunset/sunrise with the 3 varieties of twilight
You are thinking of “Pre Nanna’s Australia” - we are all getting thin skinned these days. Legislated into cotton wool.
Still a fair way from thinking CASA is “precious” though, I’d suggest!

Most of us would prefer an “Authority” that had some sort of interest in Aviation.

Keep smiling, and leaving a margin everyone.
Twist & Shout is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2019, 00:32
  #142 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,164
Received 190 Likes on 95 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by [email protected]
Some people seem very sensitive about having their precious CASA questioned - I thought Aussie were supposed to be thick skinned and laid-back
I doubt whether anyone is sensitive about having CASA questioned. A two minute scan of pprune would reveal that questioning CASA could be classified as the hobby for many contributors and the full-time occupation of some.

When it comes to Poms telling us that they know best, that's a different story. There's probably some historical perspective to that.
MickG0105 is online now  
Old 17th Oct 2019, 01:39
  #143 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: OZ
Posts: 281
Received 19 Likes on 5 Posts
Just to be clear*:

”Sunset” 17:38
”Aviation Last Light” 18:02 (Australian definition)
”Disappeared from radar” 18:49
Destination 40min+ away.

Definitions or methods of calculating “night” are irrelevant in this case.
Only a politician could claim the crash occurred during the “day”.

* Info from this thread - not confirmed

Last edited by Twist & Shout; 17th Oct 2019 at 01:40. Reason: *
Twist & Shout is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2019, 03:21
  #144 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,931
Received 391 Likes on 206 Posts
Can you guess what the definition of day is yet???
Sure can Crab, December has 31 of them, a year 365, not counting leap year. Anything else you're not clear on?
megan is online now  
Old 17th Oct 2019, 09:56
  #145 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,317
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Somewhat variable when compared to the UK since we have such a vast country and standard approximations just don't cut it
Looking comparatively and differences between first light and sunrise and then between sunset and last light at different locations in Australia and UK:

We find the variation is between 22 and 27 mins FL to SR and the same SS to LL in Australia - perhaps an average of 25 mins?

In UK it is presently 36 to 37 mins FL to SR and 30 to 38 SS to LL - perhaps an average of 35 mins.

In Australia you have to use a calculator or app to establish LL times for VFR flight when the national average is about 25 mins.

In UK we just use 30 mins after sunset as the cutoff.

Who is making mountains out of molehills?

Tuilagi vs Kerevi in the midfield will be interesting
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2019, 13:45
  #146 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Who is making mountains out of molehills?
#
Crabb: As I found out when I was acquiring my Australian ATPL, There are so many barmy politically correct selective questions that you wonder about the mental state of the originators.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2019, 01:27
  #147 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,931
Received 391 Likes on 206 Posts
you wonder about the mental state of the originators
Amen, don't know if it's still the case but for a ATPL(H) you had to do pressurisation and Boeing 767 glass cockpit, who has pressurisation?
megan is online now  
Old 18th Oct 2019, 01:52
  #148 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by megan
Amen, don't know if it's still the case but for a ATPL(H) you had to do pressurisation and Boeing 767 glass cockpit, who has pressurisation?
don’t forget the INS with drift rates and great circle tracks.
havick is online now  
Old 18th Oct 2019, 02:05
  #149 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,379
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by megan
Amen, don't know if it's still the case but for a ATPL(H) you had to do pressurisation and Boeing 767 glass cockpit, who has pressurisation?
Nothing unique there; for my UK CAA ATPL/H I had to do a trans-Atlantic plot in a 707

And on the other end of the scale, the same syllabus required to go back to air-driven gyro instruments after 6 years on Sea Kings
John Eacott is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 00:18
  #150 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,931
Received 391 Likes on 206 Posts
don’t forget the INS with drift rates and great circle tracks
With the average range of the average helo I wonder what the maximum difference could be had vis a vis rhumb and great circle. When I first started commercial offshore all you had was a clock and compass and when the ATPL(H) was introduced it was a take as long as you like exam Reg Trenewick (Sp?) had hand written.
megan is online now  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 22:33
  #151 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pedantic's derailing the thread, it was dark, enough of the hair splitting.
Super Cecil is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 22:42
  #152 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Sydney
Posts: 154
Received 26 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Super Cecil
Pedantic's derailing the thread....
Hey, there is no apostrophe in pendantics!
JustinHeywood is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2019, 22:37
  #153 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: OZ
Posts: 281
Received 19 Likes on 5 Posts
Any update on the claim they landed in a field, then took off again for the fatal segment?
Twist & Shout is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2019, 23:32
  #154 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London/Atlanta
Posts: 446
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Twist & Shout
Any update on the claim they landed in a field, then took off again for the fatal segment?
Twist & Shout, I thInk there is some tracking info on here prior to the loss, not sure about landing in a field?
nomorehelosforme is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2019, 02:03
  #155 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,164
Received 190 Likes on 95 Posts
UVC Preliminary Report released

The preliminary on VH-UVC's crash is out.

Preliminary report published 7 November 2019
The information contained in this investigation update is derived from the initial investigation of the occurrence. Readers are cautioned that there is the possibility that new evidence may become available that alters the circumstances as depicted in the report.

What happened
On 6 September 2019, at 1430 Eastern Standard Time,[1] the pilot of a UH-1H helicopter registered VH‑UVC (UVC) departed Archerfield Airport, Queensland, with four passengers on board. The pilot was conducting a private flight for the purpose of repositioning the helicopter to Bankstown Airport, New South Wales.

At about 1600, the pilot landed at Coffs Harbour, New South Wales to refuel the helicopter. Following refuelling, the pilot departed at about 1648 and tracked to the south. At 1755, the pilot made contact with Williamtown Tower, requesting clearance to track south via the Visual Flight Rules[2] lane. The pilot also requested a climb to higher altitude, to take advantage of favourable winds. The Williamtown Tower controller advised the pilot to contact Williamtown Approach (Approach) for clearance.

At 1757, the pilot of UVC made contact with Approach and requested clearance. At 1758, the Approach controller identified UVC’s position as 7.4 km (4 nautical miles) to the north-east of Broughton Island (Figure 1), and advised the pilot he could operate at whatever altitude was required provided it was not below 2,400 ft. The pilot responded with a request to operate between 3,000 and 3,500 ft. At 1758 UVC was cleared to track coastal southbound at a block altitude between 3,000 and 3,500 ft.

At 1759, following an inquiry from the Approach controller, the pilot advised that Bankstown was his intended destination. At 1800, the pilot was advised that if any further track and altitude changes were required to advise accordingly. While no response was required, the pilot did not acknowledge the transmission. At 1801, the controller again contacted UVC to offer alternative tracking if required. The pilot responded requesting to remain on the eastern side of the romeo five seven eight alpha (R578A) restricted area. The controller clarified this request and, in response, the pilot advised if it was not available he would continue on the VFR coastal route. The pilot was then cleared to track as required for Bankstown Airport. The track clearance was acknowledged by the pilot at 1802.

At 1805, the Approach controller contacted the pilot to confirm that operations were normal, having observed that the altitude of UVC had dropped to 2,700 ft. The pilot acknowledged the altitude drop, commenting on a sudden wind gust affecting the helicopter’s altitude. The controller responded by providing clearance for the pilot to operate between 2,400[3] and 3,500 ft. This was acknowledged by the pilot who also commented on the turbulent conditions that were being experienced. The controller acknowledged the conditions and made a further offer of assistance should the pilot require it.

UVC was later observed on Williamtown Air Traffic Control radar to make a left turn to the south, depart the coastal VFR lane and head offshore. According to Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B)[4] data supplied by Airservices Australia, the helicopter’s position at the beginning of the turn at 1811, was 2.3 km west-south-west of Anna Bay.[5]

The aircraft continued to track offshore to the south-west for about 1 min 20 sec, maintaining between 3,000 and 3,600 ft before commencing a rapidly descending, left turn. Surveillance data showed that the aircraft commenced this descent from 3,400 ft at about 1812:56, and the last data point identified the aircraft passing 525 ft at 1813:18. Figure 2 shows the final flight segment based on ADS-B data, including the turn out to sea.

Two attempts by the Approach controller to contact the pilot at 1813 were unsuccessful. The controller then broadcast advice to the pilot that surveillance identification had been lost and to immediately check altitude. Further advice of the area’s QNH[6], the lowest safe altitude in the area, and an instruction to climb immediately were broadcast. The controller followed that transmission with several more unsuccessful attempts to contact the pilot.

Recorded data

The aircraft was fitted with a Mode S transponder that broadcast ADS-B data. This information included the position and altitude of the aircraft and was received by Airservices Australia as well as other third‑party ADS‑B receivers (Aireon and FlightRadar24) and provided to the ATSB.Also on board were two mobile devices with the OzRunways application installed. This application provides the option for live flight tracking by transmitting the device’s position and altitude and that information was also obtained by the ATSB.

Site and wreckage

Initial indications of the possible location of the helicopter were found on the evening of 6 September at 1917. Search personnel in aircraft reported an oil slick on the sea surface, about 5.5 km to the south-south-west of Anna Bay. Two more oil slicks were observed that night in the same vicinity.There were numerous reported sightings of possible helicopter wreckage that evening and the following morning with a small piece of floating wreckage, identified as part of the rear cabin lower bulkhead, retrieved by officers on a New South Wales Police Force search vessel on 7 September.

Two items that were also identified as wreckage from the helicopter subsequently washed ashore on Stockton Beach, and were collected by police on 18 September.Following an extensive sea search, hampered by poor sea and weather conditions, the helicopter wreckage field was located on 26 September 2019. The wreckage field was situated about 5.4 km to the south-west of Anna Bay, in about 30 metres of water. A large section of the helicopter tailboom was recovered from the wreckage field for further examination (Figure 3).

Pilot details

The pilot held Private and Commercial Pilot (Helicopter) Licences and was qualified to fly by day under the Visual Flight Rules. The pilot also held a single-engine helicopter class rating and a gas turbine engine design feature endorsement. The pilot last conducted a single-engine helicopter flight review in October 2018 that was valid until 31 October 2020. His logbook indicated he had a total of 1,440.5 flying hours experience.

The pilot held a Class 1 aviation medical certificate that was valid until 26 Apr 2020.

Weather and available light

Forecast meteorological conditions for the Williamtown area for 6 September 2019 included moderate to severe turbulence and wind gusts up to 38 knots from the north-west from 1000. From 1800, severe turbulence was forecast with wind gusts up to 45 knots occurring from the west-north-west and layers of scattered[7] cloud at 4,000 ft and broken[8] cloud at 12,000 ft above ground level. Light showers of rain were also forecast.

Comments between Williamtown Approach and Tower controllers at 1753 made reference to visibility in the area, which was noted to be about 6‑7 km.Last light[9] for the Anna Bay area, was calculated to occur at 1801 however, the presence of cloud cover, dust or masking terrain to the west would have resulted in last light occurring at an earlier time.
MickG0105 is online now  
Old 7th Nov 2019, 03:13
  #156 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Preliminary Report Published

https://www.atsb.gov.au/publications...r/ao-2019-050/
Lude-og is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2021, 06:07
  #157 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Aus
Posts: 568
Received 71 Likes on 25 Posts
https://www.atsb.gov.au/media/577986...-050-final.pdf
junior.VH-LFA is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2021, 09:23
  #158 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 555
Received 79 Likes on 38 Posts



What the ATSB found

The ATSB found that the pilot continued to fly after last light without the appropriate training and qualifications, and then into dark night conditions that provided no visual cues. That significantly reduced the pilot's ability to maintain control of the helicopter, which was not equipped for night flight.

Once visual references were lost, the pilot likely became spatially disorientated and lost control of the helicopter, resulting in a collision with water.

Further, the pilot did not disclose on-going medical treatment for significant health issues to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority. That prevented specialist consideration and management of the on‑going flight safety risk the medical conditions and prescribed medications posed.
Cloudee is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2021, 09:33
  #159 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The ADS-B flight data plot is almost identical to the N72EX accident.
gulliBell is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.