RAF go from Dambusters to Dam builders
Thread Starter
RAF go from Dambusters to Dam builders
This is not the first time the RAF have been called in recently to assist with flood problems.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-derbyshire-49199505
Emergency crews are racing to save a damaged reservoir, as "terrified" residents fear their Derbyshire town could be flooded.
Water is being pumped out of the 300-million-gallon Toddbrook Reservoir and an RAF helicopter is dropping 400 tonnes of aggregate around it.
Part of the dam wall collapsed on Thursday afternoon
My concern is how will 400 tonnes of ballast hold 300 million gallons of water!!!!
Better pictures and video here.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rvoir-dam.html
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-derbyshire-49199505
Emergency crews are racing to save a damaged reservoir, as "terrified" residents fear their Derbyshire town could be flooded.
Water is being pumped out of the 300-million-gallon Toddbrook Reservoir and an RAF helicopter is dropping 400 tonnes of aggregate around it.
Part of the dam wall collapsed on Thursday afternoon
My concern is how will 400 tonnes of ballast hold 300 million gallons of water!!!!
Better pictures and video here.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rvoir-dam.html
Last edited by nomorehelosforme; 2nd Aug 2019 at 12:04.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: on the ground
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by nomorehelosforme
My concern is how will 400 tonnes of ballast hold 300 million gallons of water!!!!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 1000+ Posts
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From what I read they dropped 400 tonnes of aggregate upstream of the dam to divert water from entering the reservoir and other watercourses.
Now they are reinforcing the dam wall.
When I was on Mark 2 Chinooks 15 years ago I lifted iso-containers and troops but didn't get to do anything like this!
Now they are reinforcing the dam wall.
When I was on Mark 2 Chinooks 15 years ago I lifted iso-containers and troops but didn't get to do anything like this!
Paxing All Over The World
This BBC page has a good 1 minute video clip of them postioining and dropping from short lines. I like the careful adjustment after each bag goes down. Also BBC second video.
Reporting that the dam level has been reduced by 2m, which is a heck of a lot.
Reporting that the dam level has been reduced by 2m, which is a heck of a lot.
Last edited by PAXboy; 2nd Aug 2019 at 18:21.
Reporting that the dam level has been reduced by 2m, which is a heck of a lot.
Nomore helos - the weight of the water on one side needs to be balanced by the weight of the dam on the other, they have simply put more weight on the dam wall where it had previously lost integrity.
Having watched the video of the Chinook, one of those random questions just popped into mind.
Seeing it drop 6 individual bags of aggregate at a time, very carefully and precisely, would it be quicker and/or cheaper to do it with say 6 Jetrangers or 350s (other types are available!), going round and round in a circuit taking one bag each at a time? I’m thinking of the high speed commercial lifting operations that you see with Christmas trees/rocks for dry stone walls, that sort of thing.
I have no idea how much a Chinook or a Jetranger costs, how much those bags weigh or if they could even be lifted by such aircraft.
And definitely no criticism at all of the job the Chinny is doing, just idle meanderings of the mind while walking the dog.
Seeing it drop 6 individual bags of aggregate at a time, very carefully and precisely, would it be quicker and/or cheaper to do it with say 6 Jetrangers or 350s (other types are available!), going round and round in a circuit taking one bag each at a time? I’m thinking of the high speed commercial lifting operations that you see with Christmas trees/rocks for dry stone walls, that sort of thing.
I have no idea how much a Chinook or a Jetranger costs, how much those bags weigh or if they could even be lifted by such aircraft.
And definitely no criticism at all of the job the Chinny is doing, just idle meanderings of the mind while walking the dog.
Paxing All Over The World
One possibility of why the Chinook/s were used is they are:
- Available immediately
- Highy experienced crew
- An excellent training exercise
- Effectively (for the local water authority) free. We may expect the Govt not to chargeback for it as it would be very bad politics {at any time} to have a dam fail when the Chinook and it's crew were available.
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by cra[email protected]
when you see the capability of the high volume pumps they use - and you can see a few of them in the news pictures, they are about half-iso sized boxes - then 2m is quite understandable.
Nomore helos - the weight of the water on one side needs to be balanced by the weight of the dam on the other, they have simply put more weight on the dam wall where it had previously lost integrity.
Nomore helos - the weight of the water on one side needs to be balanced by the weight of the dam on the other, they have simply put more weight on the dam wall where it had previously lost integrity.
Crab, I started looking at the mathematics of this and gave up! That aside, some good pictures and videos on the Daily Mail
IIRC the Jet Ranger (B206) can only undersling 1200 lbs, the 350 is probably similar. I understand the Chinook can carry 28,000 lbs. Each bag is, I believe circa 2,000 lbs.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The bags underneath the Chinook are at least I cubic metre each. A cubic metre of gravel weighs 1.92 tonnes, or 4862 lbs. for short.
Slightly more than the 3,200 lbs. Jetranger's maximum weight.
Slightly more than the 3,200 lbs. Jetranger's maximum weight.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: on the ground
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by nomorehelosforme
Crab, I started looking at the mathematics of this and gave up! That aside, some good pictures and videos on the Daily Mail
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Training Risky
From what I read they dropped 400 tonnes of aggregate upstream of the dam to divert water from entering the reservoir and other watercourses.
Now they are reinforcing the dam wall.
When I was on Mark 2 Chinooks 15 years ago I lifted iso-containers and troops but didn't get to do anything like this!
Now they are reinforcing the dam wall.
When I was on Mark 2 Chinooks 15 years ago I lifted iso-containers and troops but didn't get to do anything like this!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...se-622283.html
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by chinook240
Nearly 19 years ago, we were doing very similar jobs with the Chinook. Remember, the answer is 2 Chinooks, what’s the question?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...se-622283.html
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 1000+ Posts
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by chinook240
Nearly 19 years ago, we were doing very similar jobs with the Chinook. Remember, the answer is 2 Chinooks, what’s the question?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...se-622283.html
Plastic
AS 350 B3 will pick up a tonne ( 1000kg ) bag of ballast. It would be way quicker and cheaper than the RAF. To be fair RAF pilots are not really trained to do repeat lifting like this hours at a time. Would be better on a long line. Normal lift cycle for us would be 1nm a minute including hooking up the load and placing within a ft of the required location.
Last time I saw a quote for a Chinnok it was £ 20k an hour, As350 is around £ 1k an hour plus ground crew and pilot
We attended the fires last year in Derbyshire, we arrived within 6 hours of being called out, took the military over 2 days to turn up. So would suggest that a civilian operator would be more on call, with better equipment and much more experience
AS 350 B3 will pick up a tonne ( 1000kg ) bag of ballast. It would be way quicker and cheaper than the RAF. To be fair RAF pilots are not really trained to do repeat lifting like this hours at a time. Would be better on a long line. Normal lift cycle for us would be 1nm a minute including hooking up the load and placing within a ft of the required location.
Last time I saw a quote for a Chinnok it was £ 20k an hour, As350 is around £ 1k an hour plus ground crew and pilot
We attended the fires last year in Derbyshire, we arrived within 6 hours of being called out, took the military over 2 days to turn up. So would suggest that a civilian operator would be more on call, with better equipment and much more experience
Exactly how many aircraft can you provide?
One small bird is not going to out lift the Chinook in the long run unless the haul is very short and the hook up time for the Chinook is slow.
This lifting by the Chinook is not exactly precision lifting but something any reasonably capable pilot can accomplish.
The Longline pilot does it all by himself....while the Military Chinook crew uses a crew member and pilot working together to get the load into the correct position.
I feel you under state the ability of the RAF Chinook crews to do a days work.....though with all of the HSE requirements, planning, briefing, and related administrative hurtles....it would take them a while to actually get to work as compared to the civil operator.
You have a point about using long lines....but then the military (RAF and US Army for sure) do not embrace that technique as a normal role or operational skill.
The military always seems to have a longer lead time and shows up with far larger a support crew than does a comparable civilian operator....been there and did that on both sides of the equation.
One small bird is not going to out lift the Chinook in the long run unless the haul is very short and the hook up time for the Chinook is slow.
This lifting by the Chinook is not exactly precision lifting but something any reasonably capable pilot can accomplish.
The Longline pilot does it all by himself....while the Military Chinook crew uses a crew member and pilot working together to get the load into the correct position.
I feel you under state the ability of the RAF Chinook crews to do a days work.....though with all of the HSE requirements, planning, briefing, and related administrative hurtles....it would take them a while to actually get to work as compared to the civil operator.
You have a point about using long lines....but then the military (RAF and US Army for sure) do not embrace that technique as a normal role or operational skill.
The military always seems to have a longer lead time and shows up with far larger a support crew than does a comparable civilian operator....been there and did that on both sides of the equation.
Last edited by SASless; 4th Aug 2019 at 12:23.
Paxing All Over The World
The time to call the military is all about red tape and paperwork. But, as I said, I strongly suspect that the real cost of this will not be passed on as it is a great training exercise. The politicians will also see it as PR. So the cost is, effectively, greatly reduced.
You can also see just how much they have lowered the level, remarkable. BBC
In one report about the residents who refuse to leave their homes prattle the classic "Health and Safety gone mad" It would be interesting to know what he would/will say if his house was swept away and his family with it ...
The Canal and River Trust estimated on Saturday that 105,000 cubic metres (23 million gallons) of water had been pumped out in 12 hours.An RAF Chinook helicopter put 400 tonnes of sandbags on the affected part of the dam on Friday - adding a further 70 on Saturday.
In one report about the residents who refuse to leave their homes prattle the classic "Health and Safety gone mad" It would be interesting to know what he would/will say if his house was swept away and his family with it ...
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
“We attended the fires last year in Derbyshire, we arrived within 6 hours of being called out, took the military over 2 days to turn up.” I’m sure that has nothing to do with military response times, in fact I know it hasn’t, more to do with political decision making.
“RAF pilots not really trained to do repeat lifting” Really, not sure what special training there is for lifting one load followed by another, isn’t that what they’re doing right now. I’ve spent 8 hours a day doing exactly that in a Chinook.
PS. Could you do it safely in 1.5 k vis, 500’ and in 1 mulch, which I suspect was the challenge given the late start time and forecast weather?
“RAF pilots not really trained to do repeat lifting” Really, not sure what special training there is for lifting one load followed by another, isn’t that what they’re doing right now. I’ve spent 8 hours a day doing exactly that in a Chinook.
PS. Could you do it safely in 1.5 k vis, 500’ and in 1 mulch, which I suspect was the challenge given the late start time and forecast weather?
Last edited by chinook240; 4th Aug 2019 at 14:39.
Avoid imitations
There's some poor information being posted about what RAF helicopter pilots are trained, or not, to do with underslung loads..
Load lifting on a 100 foot strop certainly wasn't uncommon in my time - it was often an essential tool, such as when the army put loads next to tall trees, instead of out in the open, to avoid giving away their position.
Not trained for repeat load lifting...? I assume you have never seen an army Brigade lift.
Load lifting on a 100 foot strop certainly wasn't uncommon in my time - it was often an essential tool, such as when the army put loads next to tall trees, instead of out in the open, to avoid giving away their position.
Not trained for repeat load lifting...? I assume you have never seen an army Brigade lift.
