Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

BRS / CHC Merger

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

BRS / CHC Merger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd May 2020, 17:37
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Out there
Posts: 362
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by wrench1
I don't know if this is pertinent to the CHC discussion, but 3 yellow/black 92s just started flying out of Mungalalu Truscott Airbase in Western Australia.
I loved operating out of Truscott
Evil Twin is offline  
Old 3rd May 2020, 19:34
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Australia
Age: 59
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heard the company operating the Black and Yellow 92’s stuffed up the corona isolation requirements in Broome and were kicked out.
airsail is offline  
Old 3rd May 2020, 19:40
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I loved operating out of Truscott
You must be mad.!!!

I presume that that was a remark that mirrors my own feeling about operating out of a Godforsaken place in WA.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 3rd May 2020, 20:27
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: N of 49th parallel
Posts: 199
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JulieAndrews
Rumour network reminder

2015 CHC 'won' the Shell SNS contract by throwing AW139s at Shell at an unsustainable rate.
Shell laps them up. CHC fights TUPE obligations then settles 'out of court'
2016 CHC ceases to exist as a going concern and files for Chap 11.
2017 CHC emerges form Chap 11......with zero credibility and credit rating ;-)
2020 Shell SNS contract not awarded to CHC upon renewal.
TUPE n/a as contract endex.

"What goes around, comes around"
Nice story, but a few things are worthy of comment.
1. "Unstustainable rate" - any basis for your comment. How would you know?
2. Your (perhaps subtle) implication that the mother ship entering Ch.11 was somehow connected to TUPE at NWI wouldn't stand up to any scrutiny.
3. Why would TUPE not apply now, if the contract has been awarded to another operator? Contract "endex" (whatever that officially means!) has nothing to do with whether TUPE applies or not.

You wouldn't have been caught up in the 2015 contract loss by any chance? Still feeling bitter? Shame!

Apate is offline  
Old 3rd May 2020, 22:25
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Used to be God's own County
Posts: 1,719
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
APate - isn’t it interesting how things are ‘read’ differently dependent upon individual mindset?
I took Julie’s summary to suggest that CHC were ‘winning’ contracts using unrealistic rates - this is nothing new -hence the phrase a ‘Loss Leader’. I then surmised that this practice might have been too widely used, leading to Chapter 11 Protection.
On a personal level - I saw how CHC managed the process and probably spent more on legal fees than they would have had to pay out if they accepted their responsibilities in the first place.
From my subsequent in-depth reading of UK Employment Law at the time - there is little chance of TUPE applying if a contract has run its course, ie ended, expired or ‘endex’. There is a greater chance if the contract changed provider part way through.
Mute point as I discovered that the protection that TUPE is meant to offer is only relevant if you are willing to fight your corner or if it’s suits the bean counters.
Please do not embarrass yourself further by suggesting that CHC behaved in anyway decently in the process.
EESDL is offline  
Old 3rd May 2020, 23:09
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Inside the Industry
Posts: 876
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
airsail:

Heard the company operating the Black and Yellow 92’s stuffed up the corona isolation requirements in Broome and were kicked out.
Not true, it is a client requirement to move to Truscott. The client likes to conduct its business away from any publicity, Truscott to the facilities is less flying time than from Broome and the client has had enough of the expensive charges levied by BIA.

The client is running a very lightly loaded Airnorth ERJ 170 between YPPH, YTST and YPDN.

Last edited by industry insider; 4th May 2020 at 05:32. Reason: Additional Content
industry insider is offline  
Old 4th May 2020, 00:18
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Out there
Posts: 362
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Fareastdriver
You must be mad.!!!

I presume that that was a remark that mirrors my own feeling about operating out of a Godforsaken place in WA.
No, actually I really did. Barrow Island on the other hand, what a dump!
Evil Twin is offline  
Old 4th May 2020, 01:55
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Australia
Age: 47
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Evil Twin
No, actually I really did. Barrow Island on the other hand, what a dump!
Truscott is a great base, oh the middle fridge!. Barrow's also great these days, one of the best bases out there, heaps to do after work and 3 cooked meals a day, cable TV, beers , sports, fishing like TST, give me that any day, although some people just weren’t cut out for it.

Last edited by belly tank; 6th May 2020 at 09:28.
belly tank is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.