Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

NYC helicopter crash 10th June 2019

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

NYC helicopter crash 10th June 2019

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jun 2019, 15:53
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Africa
Posts: 535
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by ApolloHeli
Here's a recent example of it - scud-running along in VMC, then abruptly climbing into IMC (probably due to disorientation in the poor weather). What is odd is that even with AP it doesn't seem like the NYC pilot tried to use it.
I support the surprise expressed by some of us here is about the re-entering IMC a second time after re-gaining VMC coming out of IMC.
Hot and Hi is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2019, 18:02
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: California
Posts: 752
Received 29 Likes on 25 Posts
Originally Posted by Hot and Hi
I support the surprise expressed by some of us here is about the re-entering IMC a second time after re-gaining VMC coming out of IMC.
If he were perhaps staring at the artificial horizon. but also disoriented (and/or stressed) to the point where his brain wasn't interpreting what the gage was telling him, then perhaps he didn't realize he was climbing back in?

,...at least that's kinda what happened to me once.
Robbiee is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2019, 18:51
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,287
Received 508 Likes on 211 Posts
During the descent seen in the video....the aircraft appeared to be traveling quite fast....and it seemed it was approaching some low cloud or fog.

Could it be something as simple as trying to slow down and the pitch up took him back into cloud.

From the collateral information it does appear he was "lost" despite being very close to his takeoff point and in an area he knew well.

Also....there are two ways to use the "Direct To" feature on a GPS....one is for your Destination....and the other is to your Departure Point.

In poor weather....using your Take Off Point as the waypoint and flying the reciprocal track away from the Take Off Point towards your destination allows you a very quick way of getting turned around if you encounter deteriorating weather.

Linden, New Jersey was not that far away.

Had the Pilot followed the shoreline at a low altitude and slow ground speed and used all of his navaids....perhaps this tragedy might have been avoided.
SASless is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2019, 21:27
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: yes
Posts: 368
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts


Originally Posted by Hot and Hi
I support the surprise expressed by some of us here is about the re-entering IMC a second time after re-gaining VMC coming out of IMC.

I don't believe its hard to explain at all. Incapacitating Spatial Disorientation, where a pilot knows that he is disoriented but fails or is incapable of taking the proper corrective action. Maybe a somatogravic illusion (among others)? Does anyone doubt this pilot’s disorientation? It’s never a requirement to be completely IMC for SD, and recovery is not necessarily instantaneous. USAF paper which gives examples of ISD located here.
JimEli is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2019, 09:49
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: On the green bit near the blue wobbly stuff
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by JimEli
I don't believe its hard to explain at all. Incapacitating Spatial Disorientation, where a pilot knows that he is disoriented but fails or is incapable of taking the proper corrective action. Maybe a somatogravic illusion (among others)? Does anyone doubt this pilot’s disorientation? It’s never a requirement to be completely IMC for SD, and recovery is not necessarily instantaneous. USAF paper which gives examples of ISD located here.
Looks to me extremely likely that it was disorientation. For everyone who seems amazed that he did not regain control after "regaining VMC" - remember, what happened is that the helicopter became visible intermittently from a point on the ground. That means that IF, the pilot was looking in the correct direction, he could have seen a patch of terra firma , (maybe through a hole in the clouds). That does not mean he had a horizon, knew the attitude or position of the helicopter, and its not sufficient for a regain of situational awareness. So, was it really VMC?
Non-PC Plod is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2019, 10:17
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Except that, the abrupt pull up when the helicopter is seen emerging from the bottom of the cloud the first time around strongly suggests he had a good visual reference to complete that manoeuvre.
gulliBell is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2019, 14:04
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by gulliBell
Except that, the abrupt pull up when the helicopter is seen emerging from the bottom of the cloud the first time around strongly suggests he had a good visual reference to complete that manoeuvre.
You're making the assumption that the pilot was making rational decisions when he was completely lost and very likely highly stressed.
havick is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2019, 16:04
  #108 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
It's not impossible that the extreme attitudes reached had toppled one or both of the aircraft main gyros, so even if he tried to use the AI he would have been on a hiding to nothing.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2019, 12:31
  #109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK/OZ
Posts: 1,887
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
The second video is published on the Instagram account thingswendysees and is not widely distributed.
It shows the aircraft in level slow clockwise tight turn approx 150ft AGL, less than 200 ft from the river bank and very near the Edison power facility, then a climb North, back past camera and toward the accident site.

Note that original videos were shot in portrait mode, but are cropped for Instagram.
The full height videos show a ferry (or ferries) sailing South down river toward camera, which may corroborate the photographers recollection that the aircraft returned very shortly after the recording of the first video ceased.

https://instagram.com/thingswendysee...=1p6xp0n8bd5zv

Mjb
mickjoebill is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2019, 14:12
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: TN
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mjb, any idea how close the Edison plant is to 6N5?
sprag47 is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2019, 20:52
  #111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Africa
Posts: 535
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Devil

Something doesn't add up here. I mean, the wx looks quite flyable. Viz at last 2000; ceiling 300, 400 ft, maybe down to 200 at some patches You may not reach your destination, but you can try. You can give it a go, slow but steady, and return to base if it gets hairy. It's not like as if the wx closed in behind him. And the pilot seems very much in control of his machine, stable hover etc as shown in the second video (the earlier one in the time line).
Hot and Hi is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2019, 21:02
  #112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: TN
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wrote pretty much this same opinion in earlier posts. This wasn't a 200-hour pilot that suddenly found himself at 6N5 facing some crappy wx. And the reported wx was 500 and 1.25 miles vis.....the video supports this.
sprag47 is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2019, 21:51
  #113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,325
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Intermittent IMC is far more dangerous and disorientating than full IMC as you have conflicting information between the instruments and the fleeting glimpses of the ground or cloud base - the human brain is hardwired to prefer visual information cues even if they are not telling the whole truth with regards to the horizon or the vertical.

Get on instruments - stay on instruments.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2019, 21:56
  #114 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: TN
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No need for him to ever look at the flight instruments...he was in VMC, just look at the East River and shoreline and fly back to the heliport. I just don't understand why so many here are hard-over for "lost and disoriented."
sprag47 is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2019, 22:44
  #115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
...Get on instruments - stay on instruments.
Unless you don't hold an IR, as in this case. Get visual, stay visual.

gulliBell is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2019, 01:07
  #116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK/OZ
Posts: 1,887
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Hot and Hi
And the pilot seems very much in control of his machine, stable hover etc as shown in the second video (the earlier one in the time line).
I’ve not been able to verify the order, so am interested if anyone has further info about timeline.

The evidence in favour that the hover video is second in the timeline is

1/The tracking data posted earlier shows a flight track that appears to match the hover video and ceases over the city near the crash site.

2/The position of a ferry sailing toward indicates the hover video was taken after the dive video.(if it is the same ferry in both shots)

But this is not conclusive evidence, as are messages from the videographer.

Note: the recently built ferry terminal (late 2018) pictured in the hover video is not present in some older google earth images.

mjb


Last edited by mickjoebill; 6th Jul 2019 at 06:22.
mickjoebill is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2019, 02:53
  #117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: California
Posts: 752
Received 29 Likes on 25 Posts
Originally Posted by Thomascoupling
No need for him to ever look at the flight instruments...he was in VMC, just look at the East River and shoreline and fly back to the heliport. I just don't understand why so many here are hard-over for "lost and disoriented."
Because, as the report stated, he "did not know whre he was".
Robbiee is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2019, 07:25
  #118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Africa
Posts: 535
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Robbiee
Because, as the report stated, he "did not know whre he was".
Sometimes when flying in very bad viz a pilot might not exactly know where they are on the map (as he/she is missing the big picture). Shouldn’t really be an issue these days with moving map apps. But many people become complacent and don’t whip out their iPad for just a local flight. Then they might get lost.

This does not imply spatial disorientation. Let’s not confuse for a second those two!

Fact remains, it was 2000 m viz, ceiling 500. Perfect day for flying along the shoreline (or between the buildings, there is enough space, might not be entirely legal though in NYC).

Something doesn’t add up.
Hot and Hi is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2019, 08:19
  #119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by Hot and Hi

Fact remains, it was 2000 m viz, ceiling 500. Perfect day for flying along the shoreline (or between the buildings, there is enough space, might not be entirely legal though in NYC).
Sounds good in theory, right up until a VFR only pilot goes IIMC.
havick is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2019, 09:52
  #120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,325
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Unless you don't hold an IR, as in this case. Get visual, stay visual.
but if you don't hold an IR, don't go flying in poor weather - 2000m viz and 500 cloudbase is not good VFR weather.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.