Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Trumps Presidential Helicopter

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Trumps Presidential Helicopter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Jun 2019, 08:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mecklenburg Vorpommern
Posts: 73
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Trumps Presidential Helicopter

Anyone notice the seemingly makeshift bent metal air intake guard - not a bread basket.
Why does a helicopter have to taxi using wheels for 500 yards before lifting as it did from Stansted ?

Last edited by Michael Gee; 3rd Jun 2019 at 12:10.
Michael Gee is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2019, 09:21
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Because it's safer taxiing on wheels than hover taxiing. And if your job is to carry POTUS then the safest way is probably the way they will do it.
gulliBell is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2019, 09:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Brantisvogan
Posts: 1,033
Received 57 Likes on 37 Posts
Originally Posted by Michael Gee
Why does a helicopter have to taxi using wheels for 500 yards before lifting as it did from Stansted ?
Between his girth and the additional drag from the combover, they probably need the rolling start to get airborne
Bell_ringer is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2019, 10:22
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mecklenburg Vorpommern
Posts: 73
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do not see the need to use the delicate wheels for 500 yards when they could lift much much quicker - I am sure all other stuff was kept at bay
Michael Gee is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2019, 10:31
  #5 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 415 Likes on 218 Posts
It's quite often an ATC requirement for a wheeled heli to ground taxy. Drives me nuts at times. Causes undue delay and uneccessarily wears out the tyres and brakes!!
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2019, 11:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,379
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Absolutely normal for heavier wheeled helicopters to taxi to a suitable area for departure. Not at all sure about the assertion that it was 500 yards, but there would be a few reasons for any S61/Sea King (or similar) to do so.

Downwash of two Sea Kings lifting would be substantial, and disrupting to the VIP escorts on the ground.
Departure on a clear area (runway) allowing a safe rejected takeoff.
Line up for a departure into wind, vs a restricted choice should a departure in the area of the startup and loading.

Michael Gee, FWIW the wheels are not 'delicate'! Not at all sure what you mean about the intake guards, they are the normal FOD shields that have been around for some 45-50 years.
John Eacott is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2019, 11:05
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Inside the Industry
Posts: 876
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am surprised that the VH-3s are in London, normally on overseas visits they use the VH-60.
industry insider is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2019, 11:06
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
In the build up to Air Force One's arrival did anyone else hear the male presenter on BBC Radio Five Live get Jeremy Hunt's surname slightly wrong (by one vital letter) and have to correct himself mid-sentence ?
peterperfect is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2019, 11:40
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,317
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
ATC prefer wheeled helicopters to ground taxi rather than air taxi - it keeps them on the same routes as FW and removes potential problems with downwash and FOD from a hovering helicopter - especially a heavy one.

From an operators point of view, it saves fuel.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2019, 11:45
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
And ground taxi time on wheels doesn't get recorded in the aircraft technical log, whereas air taxi time does. Not that that would be a factor in this instance.
gulliBell is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2019, 12:24
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mecklenburg Vorpommern
Posts: 73
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
John Eacott
everything on a helicopter is delicate - taxi for runway 09 was a long taxi when a heli with skilled pilots taking into account all the dangers around are meant to fly - Air Traffic are not familiar with what helicopters can or can not do they are fixed in their minds like many fixed wing pilots.
The mod on No 1 heli looks makeshift - No 2 was without it. Have a look at catch up TV of Trumps arrival at Stansted UK this morning.
Your quote Intake Guards have been around 40 50 years so have I and still at it at 79 years of age
Michael Gee is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2019, 12:26
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London/Atlanta
Posts: 446
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Royal protocol

There are a few pictures of Marine One at Buckingham Palace and Winfield House but the interesting picture is the first one, it actually looks like Mr Trump has gone against all Royal Protocol and decided to give the Queen a good old American fist bump rather than shake her hand!

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-48491722

Last edited by nomorehelosforme; 3rd Jun 2019 at 16:30.
nomorehelosforme is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2019, 18:11
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,285
Received 499 Likes on 208 Posts
Seeing is believing as it is said.

Post the photo and show us what you are using as a basis for your post.

The Caption of the very first video clearly states....."Trump shakes Queen's Hand".

Did BBC get it all wrong?
SASless is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2019, 18:13
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK - The SD
Posts: 459
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
FOD as Crab@ said.
serf is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2019, 18:23
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London/Atlanta
Posts: 446
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Sasless,

My comment was said in jest, and the BBC have replaced the original picture with a video, but funny enough The Daily Mail managed to make a story of it around the same time.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...am-Palace.html

Perhaps I missed my real vocation in life as a jorno for a crappy tabloid...
nomorehelosforme is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2019, 18:33
  #16 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 415 Likes on 218 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
ATC prefer wheeled helicopters to ground taxi rather than air taxi - it keeps them on the same routes as FW and removes potential problems with downwash and FOD from a hovering helicopter - especially a heavy one.

From an operators point of view, it saves fuel.
Not when they make you join the queue of taxying fixed wing for a runway you don't actually need or want to use and are then obliged to allow for vortex wake separation. An extra fifteen or twenty minutes burning and turning prior to departure certainly doesn't save fuel. Sometimes a significant part our planned fuel reserve is used up before we even get to take off.

ShyTorque is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2019, 18:49
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: A very long way North
Posts: 469
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by ShyTorque
Not when they make you join the queue of taxying fixed wing for a runway you don't actually need or want to use and are then obliged to allow for vortex wake separation. An extra fifteen or twenty minutes burning and turning prior to departure certainly doesn't save fuel. Sometimes a significant part our planned fuel reserve is used up before we even get to take off.
And then you add a bit on because it’s rush hour at Aberdeen and the customer has taken every kg of payload, only to be cleared straight on.
PlasticCabDriver is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2019, 18:56
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Southwater
Age: 73
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That picture of Prince Charles and Camilla meeting the Trumps.
"One puts one's left leg in, one's left leg out....."
RedhillPhil is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2019, 19:09
  #19 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 415 Likes on 218 Posts
PCD,

A bit of extra fuel isn't an option when your normal fuel load is "full tanks". Being obliged to ground taxy at MAUM for long distances to the end of a runway is frustrating when all you actually need is a 15 x 15 metre helipad.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2019, 23:19
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,379
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Michael Gee
John Eacott
everything on a helicopter is delicate - taxi for runway 09 was a long taxi when a heli with skilled pilots taking into account all the dangers around are meant to fly - Air Traffic are not familiar with what helicopters can or can not do they are fixed in their minds like many fixed wing pilots.
The mod on No 1 heli looks makeshift - No 2 was without it. Have a look at catch up TV of Trumps arrival at Stansted UK this morning.
Your quote Intake Guards have been around 40 50 years so have I and still at it at 79 years of age
Nice that you're still flogging around after some years, but believe me the SH3/Sea King undercarriage is not 'delicate'. Anything that stood up to many hundreds of my deck landings is quite capable of a little bit of taxiing!

I think your dig at ATC is more than a little unjustified, too.

Still no idea what you're referring to on the intake as they both look the same to me, standard barn doors. Here is Marine One yesterday with POTUS boarding:




This was an airfield taxi worth making, much the same distance as Marine One

John Eacott is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.