Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Bell 212 Best Rate Of Climb with FMS-29

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Bell 212 Best Rate Of Climb with FMS-29

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Apr 2019, 22:57
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bell 212 Best Rate Of Climb with FMS-29

In the Bell 212 RFM it refers specifically to 58 Kts for Best Rate Of Climb (3-3-A) and the rate of climb performance charts all use 58 Kts as well. However, in FMS-29 "Increased Takeoff Horsepower" there is no direct reference to 58 Kts for Vy (VBroc) and the climb performance charts all use 55 Kts.

Any idea if Vy for FMS-29 is 58 Kts or 55 Kts? Any other thoughts on this?
fly_boyz is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2019, 08:12
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Use the Vy stated on the climb performance chart applicable to the operation.
gulliBell is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2019, 09:47
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,245
Received 330 Likes on 183 Posts
Not sure what FMS 39 is but sounds like it relates to the TB138/145 mods allowing higher T/O power. However, why would you expect Vy to change? It’s unrelated. Must admit my recollection is that Vy was 56 kts.
212man is online now  
Old 11th Apr 2019, 12:07
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,285
Received 500 Likes on 208 Posts
55/56/59 Knots....just how accurate is the Airspeed Indicator anyway?

Gulli is right....if you are using a particular chart....use the Airspeed that is indicated on the applicable chart.

Reading the Supplement carefully should provide the information you need.

Memory tells me that if the FMS changes something in the FM.....it will be noted and that new data will supersede the FM original data.

SASless is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2019, 16:30
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: yes
Posts: 368
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
Keep in mind Vy varies with altitude. The RFM value is probably given for sea level and will increase ~1 knot per 1000’.

Disclaimer: I’m not familiar with the B212.
JimEli is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2019, 22:50
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,285
Received 500 Likes on 208 Posts
From a Bell FMS....
.The information contained herein supplements the information of the basic Rotorcraft Flight Manual. For Limitations, Procedures, and Performance Data not contained in this supplement, consult the basic Rotorcraft Flight Manual and applicable Rotorcraft Flight Manual Supplements.
SASless is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2019, 20:38
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks, everyone. It is interesting. I assume that the "Increased Takeoff Horsepower" (FMS-29) mod must include some aerodynamic difference that changes Vy from 58 to 55. I think the tail rotor with the different yoke is part of this mod, but I'm not sure.

Also, is there somewhere that states that the speed used for the performance charts is, in fact, Vy or is that just common knowledge that I should just know?
fly_boyz is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2019, 20:46
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was just told that the bigger tail rotor is not required for the Increased Takeoff Horsepower modification so that's not the answer either. Anyway, just being a bit pedantic but curious. :-)
fly_boyz is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2019, 19:12
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: yes
Posts: 368
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
Me thinks 55 KCAS = 58 KIAS.
JimEli is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2019, 01:04
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,740
Received 150 Likes on 74 Posts
As it was explained to me .”The numbers called for are for Standard ISA. and are IAS.
Of course as you go to ISA + you still use 58Kts IAS as TAS will be higher..at a higher density altitude.”
The guy was a Bell Pilot he made sense to me.
I could be wrong but he explained the chart was made to make it easy for the pilot in an emergency situation.

albatross is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.