Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Bristow Wrong Deck Landing

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Bristow Wrong Deck Landing

Old 31st Mar 2019, 09:13
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Annual British Petroleum/Bristow Helicopters Golf Outing.

Perth Golf Club is going to be the venue so a Bristow Tiger is loaded and off they go. A courtesy call to Perth airfield before landing at the course.
"I hope you can find it; we're socked in with fog."

Having failed to check the weather at their destination they were forced to turn back to Aberdeen. There they bundled the BP boys into the passenger lounge and searched for another gold course. Nairn was prepared to accept them so passengers rebriefed and off they went.

Arrive at Nairn, espy the course and there is a big crowd awaiting them so they land on a clear stretch of grass by the clubhouse. No 2 goes out to check that it is OK to shut down there to be met by irate club secretary: They had arrived in the middle of their monthly medals tournament.

Wrong golf course.

The second time was lucky and the day progressed but a little bit more rushed than planned.

When they arrived back at Aberdeen the rumour goes that BP were highly unimpressed. Next time the Forties contract renewal came up Bristow lost it.

Last edited by Fareastdriver; 31st Mar 2019 at 13:48.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2019, 09:38
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Inside the Industry
Posts: 876
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Next time the Forties contract renewal came up Bristow lost it.
If this happened in the 70s, it must have been a long contract, we were still flying to the 40s in 1984 before I left Aberdeen.
industry insider is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2019, 09:52
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: offshore
Age: 64
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Hutton and North West Hutton were often mixed up. I landed on the wrong one a couple of times in the late eighties and we received a few errent landings too in that period. Most of the time there is little consequence but it is important that we guard against those occasions where the loss of life is possible and not dismiss it as one of thise things
S92PAX is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2019, 12:44
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,244
Received 330 Likes on 183 Posts
The golf course incident I was referring to was a Tiger, as that was what BB was flying at that time (around 1992). I don’t recall the details of which courses were involved.
212man is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2019, 12:50
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
It probably was a Tiger. The one I went on was in a S61 which was a bit before then.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2019, 15:46
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Used to be God's own County
Posts: 1,719
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Worrying to read of a certain attitude towards wrong landings.
Make no mistake, landing on the wrong deck is a major incident and exposes various failings.
EESDL is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2019, 16:00
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,283
Received 498 Likes on 207 Posts
Care to tell us why you think these things happen to well trained and experienced crews?

What JuJu works to line up all those holes in the Cheese that lets landing on the wrong deck happen?

SASless is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2019, 17:56
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lost again...
Posts: 898
Received 120 Likes on 55 Posts
Originally Posted by SASless
Care to tell us why you think these things happen to well trained and experienced crews?

What JuJu works to line up all those holes in the Cheese that lets landing on the wrong deck happen?
Because human beings are fallible and when you build platforms that look very similar close together, give them similar sounding names and then ask pilots to fly multiple sectors to them (more often than not under circumstances that are likely to induce fatigue and often worrying about the latest round of redundancies too) you are creating a situation where mistakes can occur.

It's been happening for as long a pilots have been landing on oil rigs.

It has serious potential dangers as listed by others.

Technological mitigations exist, such as red wave off lights / green deck clear lights but oil companies will not pay for these (Although safety is their number one priority) and operators won't insist because they are in a perpetual contract negotiation merry-go-round.

OH
OvertHawk is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2019, 18:04
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida
Age: 59
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EESDL
Worrying to read of a certain attitude towards wrong landings.
Make no mistake, landing on the wrong deck is a major incident and exposes various failings.
Various failings? Maybe. Major incident? Hardly.
helonorth is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2019, 20:42
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grand Prix, Brands Hatch, mid 80's.
Happy to have got Nelson Piquet safely home after his win, but beginning to get tired after several hours of shuttling the great unwashed out of the circuit.
Another take off, including the multiple near-misses that were so much a part of GP shuttles in those days.
Reached cruise height, breathed out for the first time in over two minutes, and realized I had absolutely no clue which of the three shuttle sites I was supposed to be going to on this rotation.
Turned to the cabin and nonchalantly asked "Ummm, just checking that you're all going to Biggin?"
Small fracas breaks out in the cabin.
Resolved by doing a round-robin to all three sites until the cabin was empty.
Problem solved!
JerryG is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2019, 07:09
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Over the Hill and far away
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having been at the front end for more than a few years and like many nearly involved in the same drama I have suggested in the past that the HLO gets more involved and only clears the aircraft to land when he sees it on final.



In past investigations the HLO’s have stated that they have observed the helicopter landing on the wrong facility but did not make any comments!
P2bleed is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2019, 09:32
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Used to be God's own County
Posts: 1,719
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Of course you are correct - we are not talking 'Piper Alpha'-type major incident - but in an environment where everything is meant to be so closely monitored, controlled and carefully planned? For an aircraft to turn up on a rig uninvited is one thing, but to continue to land I would consider a 'major incident' in pilot CRM-aspect assessment of risk and breakdown of procedures.
My apologies, I did not want you to get too excited ;-)
I suspect that over-familiarity and slacking of procedures can be held responsible here - waiver following: This is merely a rumour forum and I have not the foggiest why it happened as I am fortunate to be many miles away from the scene and happy to take a calculated guess as no injuries, just pride :-)
EESDL is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2019, 13:39
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,283
Received 498 Likes on 207 Posts
For the cost of a Green Rotating Beacon on or adjacent to the Helideck....and the direct involvement of the HLO to turn it ON at the deck edge...signifying the Deck is ready to receive Aircraft......the problem could be solved.

The failure mode....no light ON....would signify a fouled deck and landing not allowed.....unless directely instructed to do so by the HLO of the Deck immediately prior to landing by the aircraft after visually sighting the aircraft.

That would allow for a failure or the rotating beacon for some reason but would require direct radio communication between the HLO and the aircraft and visual identification of the landing aircraft.

Or am I thinking all wrong here?
SASless is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2019, 17:05
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,956
Received 17 Likes on 11 Posts
All good ideas, Mr S.

That system wouldn’t work for NUIs though.
Bravo73 is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2019, 18:09
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
For the cost of a Green Rotating Beacon on or adjacent to the Helideck
Not being any sort of expert of International Maritime Law but is it possible that a marine object can only display red/green lights for navigational purposes?
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2019, 18:48
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: A very long way North
Posts: 469
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by SASless
For the cost of a Green Rotating Beacon on or adjacent to the Helideck....and the direct involvement of the HLO to turn it ON at the deck edge...signifying the Deck is ready to receive Aircraft......the problem could be solved.

The failure mode....no light ON....would signify a fouled deck and landing not allowed.....unless directely instructed to do so by the HLO of the Deck immediately prior to landing by the aircraft after visually sighting the aircraft.

That would allow for a failure or the rotating beacon for some reason but would require direct radio communication between the HLO and the aircraft and visual identification of the landing aircraft.

Or am I thinking all wrong here?
Not all wrong at all. Or even dual mode deck lighting: red & green. Either the deck edge lights, the central H lighting, or both. Lights would sit routinely at red, when the HLO is happy to receive the aircraft, he switches them to green. "Deck available, lights are green". If the deck the crew is looking at still has red lights, something's gone wrong!

Once the aircraft has lifted and is away, back to red they go.

Can't be that difficult shurely?
PlasticCabDriver is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2019, 19:48
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,283
Received 498 Likes on 207 Posts
FED, Steady Red , Green and White (or combinations of those colors) for nautical navigation lights....thus the rotating beacon.....or strobes.

No expert but Submarines use a flashing Amber Light when surfaced as I recall.

32 CFR § 707.7 - Submarine identification light.
§ 707.7 Submarine identification light.Submarines may display, as a distinctive means of identification, an intermittent flashing amber beacon with a sequence of operation of one flash per second for three (3) seconds followed by a three (3) second off-period. The light will be located where it can best be seen, as near as practicable, all around the horizon. It shall not be located less than two (2) feet above or below the masthead lights.

Last edited by SASless; 1st Apr 2019 at 22:36.
SASless is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2019, 20:46
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My biggest bug bear is installations failing to have big bold names displayed at appropriate positions. Globally this is the case and the deck shouldn't get certified unless the operator does so. That would make the issue clear to all, including the muppets on short finals to land who can't follow the route plan or navigate for toffee.
NRDK is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2019, 14:26
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: South East Asia
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AIS

Why don't all offshore helicopters have AIS receivers (tx not needed) with the rig identification displayed alongside the radar or nav display target? Almost all offshore installations, ships and boats transmit their identification and position. Receiving and displaying this in a modern helicopter should not be beyond the wit of man!
he1iaviator is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2019, 14:36
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 514
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts
Because we have a radar with waypoints transposed over the display showing which rig corresponds to each return. Assuming they are rigs. Returns we don't recognise are usually standby vessels, fishing boats etc.

I guess ais would show what the unknown returns are, but I don't personally see the benefit or have ever though 'if only we had an ais display right now'
helicrazi is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.