Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

5 dead, Kenya Bell 505 crash

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

5 dead, Kenya Bell 505 crash

Old 6th Mar 2019, 22:52
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lost and Legless somewhere in LaLaLand
Age: 77
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He was formerly in the KDF, but that doesn’t mean he’s instrument rated even if at some time he did instrument flying. He was flying a civilian aircraft on a commercial contract. I doubt that he had a valid, or current IR. I’m also sure that Bell 505 was nit cleared for IFR flight.
Phone Wind is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2019, 00:30
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: yyz
Posts: 95
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
lots of accidents there, i looked up the linkl, and all the issues they have had

https://www.nation.co.ke/news/Willia...f9g/index.html
rigpiggy is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2019, 01:48
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Phone Wind
...the fact still remains that flight in non-IFR helicopters with non-instrument rated crews is illegal in Kenya and in hostile terrain like that at night, the chance of surviving a major failure is minimal
The major failure was the pilot decision to take-off under the flight rules and conditions described, not whether the helicopter had a technical malfunction of some sort after take-off.

If the flight rules did not permit night operations, and the pilot complied with that requirement, they would all still be alive. That is the simple truth of the matter.
gulliBell is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2019, 02:15
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: France
Age: 58
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not many hills here
helialan is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2019, 08:14
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,459
Received 49 Likes on 33 Posts
Not making assumptions, however if the pilot elected to break a golden rule it’s extremely disappointing! When will people ever learn? There was an accident in Australia a few years ago where a highly experienced pilot who was flying a helicopter for the ABC that crashed doing a similar activity.

Experience is no excuse for blatant stupidity, not that I’m assuming this was the case in this accident. I’ve seen to many cases where pilots have broken the golden rules, VFR into IFR and idiots mucking around below LSALTs in IMC.

I can also admit that I used to be one of those stupid idiots and was lucky enough to survive on multiple occasions and have learnt. I have had a few good friends killed doing exactly the same, hence I don’t tolerate this behaviour anymore. I’m one of the lucky ones as I have survived to tell the story, some haven’t.

No excuses for breaking the golden rules under normal conditions in 2019, the pioneering days and elementary GPS days have long gone. Personal standards will only keep pilots safe, not rules and SOPs.
Duck Pilot is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2019, 09:45
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
What's left of it.

gulliBell is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2019, 11:29
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,267
Received 467 Likes on 191 Posts
Personal standards will only keep pilots safe, not rules and SOPs.

One must know one's own limitations....and learn to say "NO!",

The toughest opponent to that concept is one's own self.

The Rule might say you are legal and may do something....the decision to do it always remains with the Pilot behind the controls.

The Rules say you may....but can you?

Last edited by SASless; 7th Mar 2019 at 13:37.
SASless is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2019, 13:06
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hobe Sound, Florida
Posts: 949
Received 32 Likes on 26 Posts
Indeed, SAS.

My predecessor as Chief Pilot at SA, Frank Tefft, offered this advice upon his retirement:

“The most important attribute of a Chief Pilot is knowing what is safe to fly and what is not.” That applies, I think, to helicopter flight operations beyond those of the test/OEM community.
JohnDixson is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2019, 14:43
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 714
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
News Update

So the second aircraft is identified as an R44, probably flown by a junior pilot in the company. And we all know those things will crash just by looking cross-eyed at them. And yet it didn’t and instead the new flagship 505 flown by the 5500 hr Chief Pilot crashed. Which says what, conditions were ok for night VFR after all? The R44 is safer than a 505? Article has a few dead ends, like the navigation aids having any influence in these days of GPS. Was the mission to depart from the shoreline lodge of Lobolo in the dark, fly 10 miles over the flat Lake Tarkana to Central Island for a recce or landing, and then back to Lobolo? On a clear night certainly doable, and it was for the 44 guy.

Maybe the R44 pilot had better night vision, unravaged by a lifetime of malaria. Ok, I’m grasping at straws here.
malabo is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2019, 16:50
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just going along with your hypothetical scenario...

The "junior pilot" was probably flying with his heart in his throat and thereby stayed alive through superior focus, determination and use of basic skills. Meanwhile it was all old hat to "chief pilot" and complacency got him.

Yet another idea: the visibility was superior in the R44 cockpit because in the 505 cockpit those shining beacons of Garmin technology were reflecting off of the canopy like crazy and/or just plain old ****-canning whatever night vision the "chief pilot" had.

Last edited by aa777888; 8th Mar 2019 at 09:59.
aa777888 is online now  
Old 7th Mar 2019, 17:20
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Brantisvogan
Posts: 1,033
Received 57 Likes on 37 Posts
Originally Posted by aa777888
Yet another idea: the visibility was superior in the R44 cockpit because in the 505 cockpit those shining beacons of Garmin technology were reflecting off of the canopy like crazy and/or just plain old ****-canning whatever night vision the "chief pilot" had.
Alternatively he may have had his eyes glued to the synthetic vision believing that would save the day.
Bell_ringer is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2019, 17:50
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: In the mountains
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Does the 505 have a cockpit video recorder of the last 30min like on all the Airbus helicopters
Flyting is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2019, 19:07
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Africa
Posts: 535
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Flyting
Does the 505 have a cockpit video recorder of the last 30min like on all the Airbus helicopters
No. Neither would I be sure that the airbus one would survive this crash.
Hot and Hi is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2019, 23:03
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 822
Received 228 Likes on 71 Posts
Couple of comments I heard from down that way was that it was very windy that evening and that winds were about 50-60 but they didn't elaborate if that was knots or mph.
KiwiNedNZ is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2019, 01:08
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lost and Legless somewhere in LaLaLand
Age: 77
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wouldn’t put too much faith in anything I read in a Kenyan newspaper (or those from most countries, as reporting standards are very low these days). According to that report in the Daily Nation, Lobolo Camp is on Central Island, whilst in fact it’s on the southwest shore of Lake Turkana. Also, Kenyan police report 5 fatalities, the Kenyan pilot and 4 Americans (whose names have all been reported in numerous journals).
What I have heard is that the 2 aircraft were shut down on Central Island as the passengers wanted to watch the sunset over the lake from there. However, around sunset the weather had deteriorated with strong winds (for which the area is well known) and they waited for a couple of hours to see if the weather would improve as they didn’t want to spend the night on the island (maybe they were brightened by the thought of the large number of Nile crocodiles in the Island lakes?)
Phone Wind is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2019, 07:50
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: New Zealand
Age: 51
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The wrecked helicopter in the picture doesn’t look like a 505...
SuperF is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2019, 09:25
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lost and Legless somewhere in LaLaLand
Age: 77
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It’s 5Y-KDL, which is definitely a B505.
Phone Wind is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2019, 09:42
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the big blue planet
Posts: 1,027
Received 24 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by SuperF
The wrecked helicopter in the picture doesn’t look like a 505...


pic in post #4 or #26? For #4 you are right.

skadi
skadi is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.