Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Helicopter collision with light aircraft NW Italy Jan 2019

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Helicopter collision with light aircraft NW Italy Jan 2019

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Jan 2019, 18:35
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: australia
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On this site it says helicopter was taking off and unaware the airplane was landing.
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/7-ki...-italy-1983742
A681001 is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2019, 08:57
  #22 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 73
Posts: 3,669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by A681001
On this site it says helicopter was taking off and unaware the airplane was landing.
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/7-ki...-italy-1983742
could nor find the reference you mention on this link but if this is the case is is a carbon copy of previous accident in Austria a few years back with a rescue helicopter. If you take off on an heli from unmarked areas the visibility on top and back is NIL and an aircraft flying low AGL , taking off or landing close by has no visibility below . .
The cost-effective solution to mitigate ( but not eliminate @ 100%) those is called FLARM . already self-mandated for all gliders in the Alps, all helicopters in Switzerland ,and starting to come on line with all powered VFR..
At the moment not accepted by EASA because the frequency they used in not protected, but I think a solution will be found especially if we see more of those preventable fatal accidents continuing to happen. .
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2019, 16:31
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas, like a whole other country
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
FLARM seems to be a reasonable solution to help prevent these sorts of events. If this Wicklepedia article is to be believed, "most" helicopters in Europe already operate with it. Did not the FW?

I seem to recall from some posts here that many gliders in the EU are using it, mostly because of low power consumption since sailplanes rely on battery power.
Carbon Bootprint is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2019, 19:34
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: australia
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
could nor find the reference you mention on this link but if this is the case is is a carbon copy of previous accident in Austria a few years back with a rescue helicopter. If you take off on an heli from unmarked areas the visibility on top and back is NIL and an aircraft flying low AGL , taking off or landing close by has no visibility below . .
The cost-effective solution to mitigate ( but not eliminate @ 100%) those is called FLARM . already self-mandated for all gliders in the Alps, all helicopters in Switzerland ,and starting to come on line with all powered VFR..
At the moment not accepted by EASA because the frequency they used in not protected, but I think a solution will be found especially if we see more of those preventable fatal accidents continuing to happen. .
who knows how accurate this is , " which appeared to have happened just after the helicopter took off, unaware that the aircraft was landing, Italian media reported. "

A681001 is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2019, 05:52
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Brantisvogan
Posts: 1,033
Received 57 Likes on 37 Posts
This doesn't need FLARM, standardise procedures and provide a frequency so you broadcast your intentions. Works well elsewhere in the world especially for unmanned areas that have a lot of traffic converging.
The eyeball has it's limitations and until you can use all the tools at your disposal these accidents will continue to happen.
Bell_ringer is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2019, 08:34
  #26 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 73
Posts: 3,669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bell_ringer
This doesn't need FLARM, standardise procedures and provide a frequency so you broadcast your intentions. Works well elsewhere in the world especially for unmanned areas that have a lot of traffic converging.
The eyeball has it's limitations and until you can use all the tools at your disposal these accidents will continue to happen.
Well if you know the area , you know there are procedures for the glacier and there is an auto info frequency ( 130.0 if my memory is correct) which normally both were into, the heli was a local on heliski ops and doing the ups and down the mountain short trips on regular basis, and the D140 was with an instructor , also based locally (but in France) ) so both very likely to have been on the frequency . Why it did not work we will know as the instructor survived. could be as stupid as a simple crossed transmission . I think FLARM would have helped here and saved lives., because it is a last minute warning where your eyesballs have failed or the threat is coming from behind ,or,from below..

For info the situation in this valley on the border between 2 states is very similar to the Niagara falls , (e.g : procedures to keep helis below sightseeing airplanes , everybody turning same same side, etc, and a frequency etc..)

ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2019, 08:36
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: no comment ;)
Age: 59
Posts: 822
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Another sad incident, one of to many between fixwing and rotorcraft, for my taste...
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
...
At the moment not accepted by EASA because the frequency they used in not protected, but I think a solution will be found especially if we see more of those preventable fatal accidents continuing to happen. .
Regarding the "acceptance" you may like to see this video:
Sourced from:
EASA Annual Safety Conference 2018
A vision for the future of General Aviation, Austria


9Aplus is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2019, 10:15
  #28 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 73
Posts: 3,669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
9Aplus, thanks for the video, looked briefly throught it, lots of powerpoints, no real time to watch during 1h40, could you give us any indication when in particular we should watch/listen ?
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2019, 17:38
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: no comment ;)
Age: 59
Posts: 822
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
@ATC...

Conclusion of that conference in short is, that EASA is ready to accept and support any technology which
may improve safety
. That also mean sort of relaxation of regulation covering GA Part 21 gain of STC and ADOA
(Alternative Procedures to Design Organization Approval)
Above presentation is clear example of that approach and not the only one....
9Aplus is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2019, 07:52
  #30 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 73
Posts: 3,669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@9Aplus ; thank you , I hope finally common sense will prevail . I know first the resistance of EASA and some EU States regulators in general about FLARM because a) it was not invented and made here ( Swiss ) and b) the frequency it uses is not protected . Both are easy to solve if the will was there. There is a huge safety benefit for VFR , as well as preventing collision against obstacles/ cables in valleys . Everyone flying recognizes this, even the non GA . ( the ex- Breitling Constellation is equipped with FLARM for instance )
That said I do not work for FLARM , and I have no interest in this company. But the technology is there and working.

A word for them in case they are listen here : Bring back the basic unit and lower the price !
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2019, 10:23
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Europe
Age: 59
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
I hope finally common sense will prevail . I know first the resistance of EASA and some EU States regulators in general about FLARM because a) it was not invented and made here ( Swiss ) and b) the frequency it uses is not protected . Both are easy to solve if the will was there.
Such false and unfair comments !

Back to real world :

EASA is studiyng FLARM with interest since at least 2006 and you know what happened in 2015 ? :

PowerFLARM MCA approved by EASA | FLARM Technology
.
HeliHenri is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2019, 18:06
  #32 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 73
Posts: 3,669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heli henri, EASA approved its installation , meaning it is not prohibited to install it on EASA certified small aircraft and gliders , but it is not unfortunately a recognized certified system yet .
But the ball is moving and there is hope at the horizon . see for example the draft proposal for amendment due next week ( how timely !)
you can see the draft here : EASA proposed
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2019, 01:11
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London/Atlanta
Posts: 446
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
There has been a video released showing the actual collision of this terrible accident, not sure if it has been posted previously, I currently can’t add the link but it is widely available.
nomorehelosforme is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2019, 03:04
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Italian police have released GoPro video recovered from the wreckage.

www(dot)abc(dot)net(dot)au/news/2019-07-11/gopro-footage-shows-mid-air-crash-between-helicopter-and-plane/11298376

(I can't post a proper link as I don't have 10 posts yet )

Last edited by Porjo; 13th Jul 2019 at 00:12. Reason: explain link
Porjo is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2019, 16:50
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: CYQS
Age: 49
Posts: 336
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Wow...

Bad day, helicopter basically disintegrates around them.

Porjo, use the link feature, it works better.
Winnie is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2019, 18:30
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 285
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Gopro footage link

finalchecksplease is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2019, 19:23
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 153
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
That’s horrific!
haihio is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.