Electric tail rotor; an alternative?
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some interesting reading.
Overview of NASA Electrified Aircraft Propulsion Research for Large Subsonic Transports.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/c...0180000361.pdf
GRC3: Integration of Innovative Electrical Systems for Rotorcraft (pages 12 & 13)
http://cleansky.eu/sites/default/fil...eport_2015.pdf
But are helicopters the future?
http://evtol.news
Upcoming lecture by Nick Lappos.
https://vtol.org/news/lappos-selecte...olsky-lecturer
.
Overview of NASA Electrified Aircraft Propulsion Research for Large Subsonic Transports.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/c...0180000361.pdf
GRC3: Integration of Innovative Electrical Systems for Rotorcraft (pages 12 & 13)
http://cleansky.eu/sites/default/fil...eport_2015.pdf
But are helicopters the future?
http://evtol.news
Upcoming lecture by Nick Lappos.
https://vtol.org/news/lappos-selecte...olsky-lecturer
.
Last edited by gevans35; 2nd Dec 2018 at 07:45.
Sadly TC, as so often is the case, this forum has been invaded by many armchair flyers who have no idea about actual operational Air operations . Best leave to their playtime air ops games!
TF
TF
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: on the cusp
Age: 52
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Or those who have no idea how these magnificent flying machines are designed or certified.
Just to make it clear, my comment about autorotation was with the assumption that the generator would then be dead, and putting enough heavy and possibly explosive batteries in a helicopter to have that as a backup doesn't seem remotely realistic to me. I didn't think of that the gearbox could drive the generator, which I realize now would be the only sensible thing to do.
The autorotation comment was just meant as an example of new problems that would arise with such a "hybrid" system. I still think the main points are that I can't imagine that such a system as a total would be as reliable as a driveshaft and a gearbox, and that it would be much less efficient. I could be wrong, but I still have a hard time seriously thinking of electrifying the TR to reduce the risk of failure.
The autorotation comment was just meant as an example of new problems that would arise with such a "hybrid" system. I still think the main points are that I can't imagine that such a system as a total would be as reliable as a driveshaft and a gearbox, and that it would be much less efficient. I could be wrong, but I still have a hard time seriously thinking of electrifying the TR to reduce the risk of failure.
You do know you can autorotate with or without a working tail rotor right?
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: Mesopotamos
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Suppose you have to hover next to a cliff or hangar with some serious crosswind. Consider the following:
Is a fixed pitch variable speed electric motor dynamic enough to hold the tail steady? What about tail rotor rpm wind down when the gusts abate, do you need tail rotor brakes?
Perhaps variable pitch constant speed is the better electric option of the two. Now how do you manage power available on two different systems. Will the electric motor run out of puff while the coal burners are just warming up? Are bigger electric motors needed along with all the penalties that introduces?
Some of us like to roll the helicopter in tiny amounts just using the pedals, will the electric fan at the back take this away from us?
Now if you are gunna stick an electric fan at the back at least allow it to pivot around 90 degrees to provide forward thrust.
Is a fixed pitch variable speed electric motor dynamic enough to hold the tail steady? What about tail rotor rpm wind down when the gusts abate, do you need tail rotor brakes?
Perhaps variable pitch constant speed is the better electric option of the two. Now how do you manage power available on two different systems. Will the electric motor run out of puff while the coal burners are just warming up? Are bigger electric motors needed along with all the penalties that introduces?
Some of us like to roll the helicopter in tiny amounts just using the pedals, will the electric fan at the back take this away from us?
Now if you are gunna stick an electric fan at the back at least allow it to pivot around 90 degrees to provide forward thrust.
I overpayed obviously. I thought Walmart had the best price, but then I found it at Best Buy for less. #rippedoff
there was a sticker inside the airframe. Mostly in Chinese that had Insp.45 on it. I assume this was the manufacturer QA inspector. I bet he knows his stuff.
the things I learned on this thing would shame Chuck Aaron and his 105. He's got nothing on me.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: hayling island
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I like this idea, main problem I can see is the tail rotor will have to keep spinning in flight otherwise there could be damage to the tail rotor blades or mechanism during start up and slow down.
Perhaps a ducted one would be superior????
Perhaps a ducted one would be superior????
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Could be designed to windmill as a generator perhaps?
Last edited by chopjock; 2nd Dec 2018 at 12:13.
if these things that might appear ludicrous aren't looked at then nothing goes forward. I remember my basic rotary wing instructor at Wallop told me ( he started as a Sycamore pilot ) that they thought it was impossible to put a gas turbine in a helicopter when he started in the 1950's. That idea was obviously a non starter as well
Moderator
The assumption that a motor would be as heavy as a TGB, IGB, MGB tail pickoff and driveshaft is not one that I would make.
I am a helicopter pilot, and have undertaken design studies for an electric powered Cessna 172 STC (program may continue) and an electric powered R22 (program will not continue). Electric power in aviation has a bright future, in a rather narrow band of application, which I opine does not include helicopters in the foreseeable future.
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: on the cusp
Age: 52
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Let's not get too ambitious. Simply replacing the mechanical drive gives enough options for now.
If we're blue sky thinking I'd look at a ducted fan that could rotate to become a pusher.
If we're blue sky thinking I'd look at a ducted fan that could rotate to become a pusher.
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Edit: Here's an example...
https://newatlas.com/rolls-royce-evtol-air-taxi/55466/
.
Last edited by gevans35; 2nd Dec 2018 at 13:40.
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: on the cusp
Age: 52
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Motors, generators and actuators are already used, so we know how to design for certification, nothing daunting there.
As has been pointed out previously the technology is already here. It's simply about the investment.
- I'm sure there's a lot of computer control in most modern helicopters already, but this would have to be entirely computer controlled to be at all flyable. That would open up a new can of worms when it comes to safety. I know that "fly-by-wire" is popular these days, but personally I only consider it "safe" as long as everybody is equipped with ejection seats.
As to fly-by-wire; so I take it that you don’t fly on any Airbus and only on some Boeings and turbo-props?
Airbus 320 family and 330 each have 5 FBW computers, and can remain flying aloft without any of them.
PS: can helicopters have ejection seats ??