Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Leonardo proposing AW109 Trekker to ADF Special Forces

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Leonardo proposing AW109 Trekker to ADF Special Forces

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Sep 2018, 20:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,141
Received 96 Likes on 51 Posts
Land 2097 ADF Special Forces Rotary Wing requirement

Leonardo offering AW109 Trekker as off-the-shelf solution to the Australian Defence Force’s needs for Land 2097, Phase 4 Special Operations Rotary Wing Capability.

https://www.verticalmag.com/press-re...es-helicopter/



Last edited by chopper2004; 12th Aug 2020 at 23:45. Reason: Subject change title
chopper2004 is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2018, 23:22
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
In the wake of the Tiger debacle - don't buy European Australia!!!
Wait for the Valor...!
tartare is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2018, 23:31
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,366
Received 203 Likes on 92 Posts
The Tiger wasn't off-the-shelf, it was in-the-bin.

The Trekker would probably be a good choice, as long as our politicians don't try to win votes by plonking it in a factory in a marginal electorate to "Australianise" it.
Ascend Charlie is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2018, 00:51
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,285
Received 500 Likes on 208 Posts
Learn from success...MD-500's, Blackhawks, and Chinooks......as one type aircraft will not meet the various needs of SpecOps Forces.
SASless is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2018, 10:07
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,131
Received 173 Likes on 89 Posts
Learn from success...MD-500's, Blackhawks, and Chinooks......as one type aircraft will not meet the various needs of SpecOps Forces.
This particular requirement calls for one type, of which 4 can be transported in the back of a C-17. Besides AW109, Airbus is offering its H145M and NorthStar Aviation its Bell 407-based MRH (as currently flown by the UAE). Would expect MDHI and Boeing to offer the 530F/G and AH-6i respectively also.

I would bet on the H145M personally. While the Tiger and NH90 have been problematic for Airbus, the H145/H145M is very much a success story, and Germany fielding it specifically in a SOF role.
melmothtw is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2018, 06:59
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Feilding
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
How many seats in the back of one of those 2g3? Okay for sniping but thats about it.
ginty79 is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2020, 23:43
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,141
Received 96 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by melmothtw
This particular requirement calls for one type, of which 4 can be transported in the back of a C-17. Besides AW109, Airbus is offering its H145M and NorthStar Aviation its Bell 407-based MRH (as currently flown by the UAE). Would expect MDHI and Boeing to offer the 530F/G and AH-6i respectively also.

I would bet on the H145M personally. While the Tiger and NH90 have been problematic for Airbus, the H145/H145M is very much a success story, and Germany fielding it specifically in a SOF role.
https://www.australiandefence.com.au...d-2097-phase-4

https://defbrief.com/2020/07/11/airb...elicopter-bid/


https://australianaviation.com.au/20...s-chopper-bid/



chopper2004 is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2020, 01:36
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by melmothtw
This particular requirement calls for one type, of which 4 can be transported in the back of a C-17. Besides AW109, Airbus is offering its H145M and NorthStar Aviation its Bell 407-based MRH (as currently flown by the UAE). Would expect MDHI and Boeing to offer the 530F/G and AH-6i respectively also.

I would bet on the H145M personally. While the Tiger and NH90 have been problematic for Airbus, the H145/H145M is very much a success story, and Germany fielding it specifically in a SOF role.
Babcock is putting forward the 429
havick is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2020, 12:26
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,141
Received 96 Likes on 51 Posts
Team Nightjar

Airbus forming Team Nightjar

https://www.airbus.com/newsroom/pres...apability.html

https://www.teamnightjar.com.au

cheers
chopper2004 is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2020, 18:24
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hobe Sound, Florida
Posts: 950
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
SAS’ comment reminded of the Vietnam lessons that were then translated into the requirements for the next generation US Army vertical lift machines, i.e., requirements specifying crashworthiness standards, ballistic survivability and vulnerability standards for the rotors and controls systems, crew seats, engines and fuel systems. Special Ops aircraft underlying assumption is that the environment is likely hostile.
JohnDixson is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.