Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Helicopter down in East River, NYC

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Helicopter down in East River, NYC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Mar 2018, 23:25
  #141 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,558
Received 38 Likes on 17 Posts
You can buy this type of harness at a big box store. But people should absolutely not be tethered during landing and takeoff when they're belted in anyway.

But of course that means you have to have a crewmember to clip in and unclip passengers when leaving and returning to their seats which reduces revenue and requires another salary.

Offshore oil crews wear goon suits and get dunker training, but naïve passengers don't
RatherBeFlying is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2018, 23:30
  #142 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Sydney
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
S012 Aircrew Safety Harness
This was originally developed as a Camerapersons Harness for media personnel filming from helicopters. It was later modified to incorporate a 3-ring quick release into the rear attachment strap that is activated from a pillow handle at the front. (The 3-ring is widely used on sport parachutes to release the main parachute in an emergency.)
This S012 is popular with Air Dispatchers, Helicopter Winch Operators and others who, during flight, are close to an open hatch.

The S012 has been tested to Australian Standard AS 1891:1983 and approved by CASA under the provisions of CAR (1998) 21.305A. Application to an individual aircraft requires separate approval. Not approved for take off or landing.
heli1980 is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2018, 23:40
  #143 (permalink)  
LRP
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 12 Posts
The elephant in the room is the FAA. They either approved this tether system, or did not monitor this operation since they openly advertised the use of the system. Should be interesting.
LRP is online now  
Old 13th Mar 2018, 23:48
  #144 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: US
Posts: 175
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The three ring release has been around for many years and is about the best there is for loads under tension being released. HOWEVER, it is not as fast if there is no tension on it and I can imagine in the shamble of a rollover accident something getting pressed up against it or stuck in it that would keep it from releasing. I have also seen on exactly two occasions where an experienced person misassembled the riser halves by slipping both smaller rings rings through the large ring ( in a bit of a hurry) and inserting the teflon coated ripcord through the loop. In that case the more load it is under, the harder it is to pull and can actually prevent a cutaway from happening. Other jumpers spotted the misrouting while going to altitude, these were all experienced people. I suggest that nobody less than a qualified professional film crew needs to have their feet in an open door for a helicopter ride. Yes, it is an E ticket, big fun thing to do but considering the real risk of over water flights without everyone having a HEEDs device on their harness it should be banned. Stop trying to make it safe for the public because it is inherently more dangerous than they know.
roscoe1 is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2018, 00:22
  #145 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,007
Received 19 Likes on 13 Posts
Follows a post I made in March 2017 concerning personal experience with helicopter accidents, harness/seatbelt releases, and photography.

Dear Vertical Freedom,

You definitely put the WOW in your pilotage and photographic skills! I garnered four hours of PIC time in an Evergreen Bell 206 Long Ranger way back in 1978. (I had accumulated 760 hours in Cessna 152's, 172's, 185's, and 320's at the time.) I could hover, barely...

One Sunday my friend/instructor called to see if I would like to bring my then-wife, son, and friend along for a sight seeing pleasure flight in the chopper. We spent nearly an hour doing maneuvers and low-level, high-speed runs over marshland and ocean. We requested and were granted landing permission at KSSI (St. Simons Island) when we were three minutes out at 3,000' MSL. My so-called friend came on the intercom and said "Watch this!" I recall, in slow motion, his reaching out from the right seat to cycle the emergency fuel cut-off switch. The annunciator panel went from green to orange to red. We were going to auto-rotate and were too low to get a relight/restart. I turned around and told my wife, son, and friend (who was busy shooting 3 frames/second with his Nikon) to Brace-Brace-Brace.

We flared 50' too soon and went down on the beach. Airspeed was indicated at 60 kts. and the VSI was pegged full down. Our skids dug into the sand, we tipped forward, and the main rotors made a clean decapitation of the boom. My wife grabbed our 8-year-old son and exited beneath the still-rotating main, which fluffed her hair. Had she been an inch taller - curtains! I fumbled frantically and finally released my five-point harness and exited stage left.

We walked about a quarter mile up the beach on Sea Island and encountered four gentlemen who were leaning out of a porch on the third floor of a condominium. They yelled "Hey! Did you see that helicopter go down? It was smoking and going too fast!" I responded "Yeah! We were in it!" "Do you want a drink?", they asked. Moments later, four gentlemen from Atlanta hugged us and motioned to a table upon which were half-gallons of every alcoholic beverage known to modern man. I grabbed a bottle and glugged. Our "pilot", replete in the knowledge that the FAA would be around soon, did not partake. My wife, who worked for the Sea Island Company, commandeered one of their limousines and took our son home. Our friend still has photos of the entire episode.

All by way of saying Thank You for bringing the joy of High Flight back to me. I have been afraid all these years and now am not. I owe a debt of gratitude to he who understands the serenity of a clear blue mountain lake, a kind and beautiful Bride, and the miracle of Himalayan Mountain Highs.

- Ed
cavuman1 is online now  
Old 14th Mar 2018, 00:33
  #146 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Redding CA, or on a fire somewhere
Posts: 1,959
Received 50 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by LRP
The elephant in the room is the FAA. They either approved this tether system, or did not monitor this operation since they openly advertised the use of the system. Should be interesting.
The FAA only requires you to wear your seat belt for take off and landing. It is my understanding looking at all the videos and dialog that standard seat belts were worn during take off and I assume landing. Once airborne, they can take those off, and there is no further requirement until landing, therefore the harnesses are a bonus and do not need to be approved as I am guessing they are attached to he hard points on the floor.

The rules say nothing about once airborne.

14 CFR 91.107 Use of seat belts

Highlight added by me:


Sec. 91.107

Use of safety belts, shoulder harnesses, and child restraint systems.

(a) Unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator--

(1) No pilot may take off a U.S.-registered civil aircraft(except a free balloon that incorporates a basket or gondola, or an airship type certificated before November 2, 1987) unless the pilot in command of that aircraft ensures that each person on board is briefed on how to fasten and unfasten that person's safety belt and, if installed, shoulder harness.
(2) No pilot may cause to be moved on the surface, take off, or land a U.S.-registered civil aircraft(except a free balloon that incorporates a basket or gondola, or an airship type certificated before November 2, 1987) unless the pilot in command of that aircraft ensures that each person on board has been notified to fasten his or her safety belt and, if installed, his or her shoulder harness.

(3) Except as provided in this paragraph, each person on board a U.S.-registered civil aircraft(except a free balloon that incorporates a basket or gondola or an airship type certificated before November 2, 1987) must occupy an approved seat or berth with a safety belt and, if installed, shoulder harness, properly secured about him or her during movement on the surface, takeoff, and landing.

Last edited by Gordy; 14th Mar 2018 at 00:51.
Gordy is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2018, 02:16
  #147 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
NTSB update on the investigation:

UPDATE: NTSB Investigation of New York City Helicopter Crash
3/13/2018

​NEW YORK (March 13, 2018)—The National Transportation Safety Board continued its investigation Tuesday into the March 11, 2018 crash of an Airbus Helicopters AS350B2 (N350LH) into New York’s East River.

The helicopter was substantially damaged when it impacted the river and subsequently rolled inverted during an autorotation, killing five passengers and injuring the pilot.

The pilot had contacted the LaGuardia Airport air traffic control tower for entry into the Class B airspace while flying at an altitude of 2,000 feet. Approximately five minutes later, the pilot declared “Mayday” and stated that the helicopter’s engine had failed. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the scheduled 30-minute aerial photography flight that was operated by Liberty Helicopters under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. The flight originated from Helo Kearny Heliport (65NJ), Kearny, New Jersey.

Parties to the NTSB investigation are the Federal Aviation Administration, Liberty Helicopters and the Bureau d'Enquêtes et d'Analyses pour la sécurité de l'aviation civile (BEA France). Airbus Helicopters and Safran Helicopter Engines are technical advisors to the investigation.

Significant activities today included:

Physical examination of the accident helicopter at New York Police Department’s Aviation Unit headquarters in Brooklyn by airworthiness, powerplant, and survival factors investigator

Engine was prepared for removal and teardown

Helicopter structure and systems examined by airworthiness investigators.

Rotor and flight control systems examination initiated

Survival factors investigators examined and documented passenger restraint system

Investigators interviewed Liberty Helicopters’ chief pilot

Interviewed witnesses and rescue personnel

Interview with accident pilot to be scheduled

NTSB’s Transportation Disaster Assistance team consulted with NYPD regarding personal effects

Recovered electronic devices, including a Go-Pro camera, which is being sent to the NTSB laboratories in Washington for readout

Recovered Appareo Vision 1000 from helicopter. Unit and memory card were placed in water for transport to NTSB laboratories. The Vision 100 could provide data on pitch, roll, and yaw as well as position, vertical speed, ground speed and altitude and ambient sound

Imagery of the ongoing NTSB investigation are available at the NTSB's Flickr page at https://www.flickr.com/photos/ntsb/ and video is available at the NTSB's YouTube Channel at https://www.youtube.com/user/NTSBgov.
https://www.ntsb.gov/news/press-rele...R20180313.aspx
Airbubba is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2018, 02:48
  #148 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Canada
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have a curiosity to see the footage recovered. But i also have a gut wrenching feeling that it would show more than I would
want to see. I respect those that have to endure that.
GrayHorizonsHeli is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2018, 05:14
  #149 (permalink)  
LRP
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Gordy
The FAA only requires you to wear your seat belt for take off and landing. It is my understanding looking at all the videos and dialog that standard seat belts were worn during take off and I assume landing. Once airborne, they can take those off, and there is no further requirement until landing, therefore the harnesses are a bonus and do not need to be approved as I am guessing they are attached to he hard points on the floor.

The rules say nothing about once airborne.

14 CFR 91.107 Use of seat belts

Highlight added by me:


Sec. 91.107

Use of safety belts, shoulder harnesses, and child restraint systems.

(a) Unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator--

(1) No pilot may take off a U.S.-registered civil aircraft(except a free balloon that incorporates a basket or gondola, or an airship type certificated before November 2, 1987) unless the pilot in command of that aircraft ensures that each person on board is briefed on how to fasten and unfasten that person's safety belt and, if installed, shoulder harness.
(2) No pilot may cause to be moved on the surface, take off, or land a U.S.-registered civil aircraft(except a free balloon that incorporates a basket or gondola, or an airship type certificated before November 2, 1987) unless the pilot in command of that aircraft ensures that each person on board has been notified to fasten his or her safety belt and, if installed, his or her shoulder harness.

(3) Except as provided in this paragraph, each person on board a U.S.-registered civil aircraft(except a free balloon that incorporates a basket or gondola or an airship type certificated before November 2, 1987) must occupy an approved seat or berth with a safety belt and, if installed, shoulder harness, properly secured about him or her during movement on the surface, takeoff, and landing.
I agree, however you've got that "careless or reckless" thing to deal with.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/13/n...harnesses.html
LRP is online now  
Old 14th Mar 2018, 05:36
  #150 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: southern half
Age: 37
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by havick
The whole harness/photo journalists designation of the passengers is a workaround so they can fly. The passengers shouldn’t have been there in the first place.
Do you really think they truly understood the risks involved?
This is one of those cases of skirting the regs where it’s not a problem until there’s crash.
100% You're not getting on a harness like that with me until you show me a valid HUET cert. I'm amazed they are allowed to fly like that.
Still, having said that, I was just in Las Vegas for the Heli Expo, there was still H130's flying charter circuits until midnight! WTF?
Unregistered_ is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2018, 06:19
  #151 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: southern half
Age: 37
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LRP
The elephant in the room is the FAA. They either approved this tether system, or did not monitor this operation since they openly advertised the use of the system. Should be interesting.

Oh, and this is ok too? I give up.

Live out your Black Ops or First Person Shooter Video Game fantasies in the ONLY gunship helicopter shooting range in Las Vegas!

Experience an open-door low flight-helicopter tour over our 71-acre private shooting range through the Mojave Desert.

Choose a belt-fed M249S SAW or an AR-15 semi-automatic assault rifle.


Unregistered_ is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2018, 06:30
  #152 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Brantisvogan
Posts: 1,033
Received 57 Likes on 37 Posts
On the twin engine debate.
Wasn't there a twin airbus that ended up in a new york river a while ago? Admittedly, it was a different kind of bus
Bell_ringer is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2018, 07:55
  #153 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 415 Likes on 218 Posts
There's a great deal of debate about passenger harnesses but surely more relevant is the cause of the aircraft entering the water in the first place and why it rolled inverted after touching down.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2018, 08:08
  #154 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: LSZG
Age: 52
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GrayHorizonsHeli
I have a curiosity to see the footage recovered. But i also have a gut wrenching feeling that it would show more than I would
want to see. I respect those that have to endure that.
Well, me being Helicopter Marshaller and Pilot, flying from time to time a EC120B, would seriously want to know what happened.

The harness topic, is one of those things that came directly into my mind from last year. We had the Swiss Helicopter Championship in precision flying. I was hooked up to a fixed harness. No way to unscrew it myself.

Being as well member of the board for the Swiss Helicopter Federation, the safety for our helicopter ops is our utmost concern. We got our yearly assembly end of April. If we can issue certain learning, recommendations to the Heli OP in Switzerland, this will be great.
MartinM is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2018, 08:48
  #155 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PLanet Earth
Posts: 1,329
Received 104 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by ShyTorque
There's a great deal of debate about passenger harnesses but surely more relevant is the cause of the aircraft entering the water in the first place and why it rolled inverted after touching down.
Hmm, I'm not so sure.
Helicopters will always find ways to end in the drink upside down. People need to have a chance to egress. On land a situation with a fire on board after a mishap would have been equally horrendous.
No way such harnesses without any quick release by the person wearing it should be allowed anywhere and for anyone in helicopters.
Yes it is highly questionable if such feet on skids operations should be allowed for tourists. That said, if it were professional photographers, the result would have been exactly the same.
If they had proper HUET: With that harness in question very likely still same result.
henra is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2018, 09:59
  #156 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: New Zealand
Age: 52
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So TC, how does a twin go when the fuel cut off is flicked?

I thought that two engines going silent went down as quick as one engine going silent.

And because its one of these super safe twins, that never hits buildings and never hits the water with TWO professional pilots onboard, it also has No floats, so sinks even quicker...
SuperF is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2018, 10:02
  #157 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: LSZG
Age: 52
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Single or twin, does not matter if a pax can hit the cut off lever by mistake.
MartinM is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2018, 10:08
  #158 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,317
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
But you would have to hit 2 fuel shut offs rather than one which is possible but less likely.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2018, 10:12
  #159 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
crab
But you would have to hit 2 fuel shut offs rather than one which is possible but less likely.
Unless they are positioned along side each other perhaps?
chopjock is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2018, 10:21
  #160 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,379
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
The way that these threads go off on a tangent is always interesting; it is speculation at the moment whether the fuel cut off was activated, or whether the FCL was pulled back, or even if there was another cause of engine failure. It has been confirmed that no personal items are allowed on board with doors off except the cameras, yet there is speculation about pax bags snagging or hindering their escape. Whatever the cause, the issue of anchoring pax into the machine with no apparent means of releasing their harness except by using a knife is demented.

Further links to the CASA oversight of crewmans harness here;

https://www.casa.gov.au/file/159631/...token=49D8J-oM

https://www.casa.gov.au/sites/g/file.../atsoc1003.pdf

Hopefully other jurisdictions can learn from this.
John Eacott is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.