Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

EC 130 down at the Grand Canyon

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

EC 130 down at the Grand Canyon

Old 1st Mar 2018, 17:33
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yorkshire uk
Posts: 1,514
That I do agree with ! In this day all tanks should be as crash proof as possible . Sadly as with most things helicopter related the price will be astronomical......
nigelh is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2018, 19:38
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Canada
Posts: 310
Originally Posted by SASless View Post
Flame Retardant clothing for tourist/corporate/air taxi flights might be a bit of a stretch....crash resistant fuel tanks is not.
there's other industries and heli operations that make you don safety gear when using their services, so give a fair example at to why you think it's a bit of a stretch?
I can see a one size fits all overall emblazoned with the company logo as they waddle you out to the aircraft for your wedding photo shoot in the valley, because the FAA said so. Is it cool? no. Is it cumbersome and a PITA? yes.
GrayHorizonsHeli is online now  
Old 1st Mar 2018, 23:23
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: "Deplorable but happy as a drunken Monkey!
Age: 71
Posts: 16,560
Do you don Flame Retardant clothing to ride BA, Virgin, Air Canada, American, United?

As we say here....State rests its case yer Honor!
SASless is online now  
Old 1st Mar 2018, 23:24
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 7,646
But how many have died on BA and Virgin recently?
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2018, 01:09
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Wild West... and Oz
Posts: 813
Crash worthy tanks are a no brainer.
The rest is ridiculous...

Have you ever been involved in tourist ops?
There has been some complete rubbish said on this thread, this taking the prize...

"They were flying because in Tourism flying they fly everyday unless it is unflyable. The visitors are only there once normally so you have to take their money while you can. That is the commercial reality. Sad but true."

Are you a commercial pilot? What company dosnt fly if its flyable?...
You will go out of business pretty quick if you only fly on nil wind, sunny days.

It might be worth looking at the numbers flown, vs accidents in tourist operations. It might surprise you.

Last edited by BigMike; 2nd Mar 2018 at 02:14.
BigMike is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2018, 01:22
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,042
GrayHorizonsHeli, before donning the fireproofs you going to ask your guests to strip off their synthetic garments? Could be interesting with the ladies.
megan is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2018, 02:23
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Canada
Posts: 310
Don't assume I think its a great idea either. But I've seen how lawyers work. Lawyers make companies pay/lose money thru liability claims. We all know how liability works.
GrayHorizonsHeli is online now  
Old 3rd Mar 2018, 12:03
  #128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: England & Scotland
Age: 59
Posts: 1,350
BBC announces one law suit

Claims:

The pilot was at fault for crashing
The Directors were at fault for not fitting crash-resistant fuel cells
The manufacturers of the aircraft were at fault for not building the machine with crash resistant fuel cells
A mechanic was at fault for work on the tail
An Inspector was at fault for work on the tail

They missed the FAA for not mandating the retro-fitting of crash resistant fuel cells. After all, that's what they did to Robinson aircraft.
John R81 is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2018, 15:41
  #129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Canada
Posts: 310
Originally Posted by BigMike View Post

It might be worth looking at the numbers flown, vs accidents in tourist operations. It might surprise you.

probably shouldn't surprise you that even one unnecessary death is one too many regardless of statistics. Agreed?




On a side note: do any current tour operators require you to sign a waiver acknowledging and accepting the risks? If so, what specifically does it refer to?
I would assume if you don't have a waiver, offering some sort of legal protection or at least something to argue in court, the operator assumes any and all risk to passenger safety.
GrayHorizonsHeli is online now  
Old 3rd Mar 2018, 23:43
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: "Deplorable but happy as a drunken Monkey!
Age: 71
Posts: 16,560
Originally Posted by [email protected] View Post
But how many have died on BA and Virgin recently?
have they made in the Grand Canyon....a couple of airliners have you know.....with no survivors.
SASless is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.