Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Queensland Whole-of-State Rescue Tender?

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Queensland Whole-of-State Rescue Tender?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Dec 2017, 08:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hiding in Plane Sight
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Question Queensland Whole-of-State Rescue Tender?

The Betoota Refueller tells of a rumour that after the recent Rescue Helicopter Review in Qld the State Government is going to put out a tender for a NSW style whole-of-state service provider. Anyone heard anything around this?
Al Fentanyl is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2017, 09:13
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: australia
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A review might happen but the QLD Gov just purchased 2 x New 139s so I doubt they would put it out tender. QLD runs its rescue service cheaper than any third party can.

But it is Gov so who the F knows
mustering guru is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2018, 00:05
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by mustering guru
. QLD runs its rescue service cheaper than any third party can.

But it is Gov so who the F knows
Just out of curiosity do you actually know how much their current department runs the service for and how much a private contractor could run the same or better service, or are you just floating rumors and hearsay?
havick is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2018, 01:04
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Reefdog
I was flying a pollie around the other day, and he asked me about my opinion of the same thing. Asked about the type of A/C, personnel, bases, equipment, logistics, etc,etc
He wanted it I gave it to him
..
About $300 million worth of hardware alone to set that up. If said pollie has any swing in government I'm sure you scuttled any plan to do more than what they are currently doing.

I heard HL are trying to get an AOC in Australia to operate AW139. Maybe they've also heard from the oracle Betoota refueller as well.
gulliBell is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2018, 09:14
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Further away
Posts: 945
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Havic, the true cost would be well hidden but I bet it’s being watched.
Wouldn’t surprise me if they put both RW and FW up for grabs
megle2 is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2018, 09:57
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hiding in Plane Sight
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Bear in mind there has just been a review, finished in November I think. The question is will it change the current setup?

Bases -- Cairns, Townsville, Horn Is, Rocky, Sunshine C, 2 x Brissy, Mt Isa, maybe 1 other in central QLD.
Really? A $17M AW139 at Mt Isa, where my sources tell me the current setup does maybe 1 (mostly unnecessary) flight a month? Why? (not taking the piss, genuine question).

The others, yep, and would also include Toowoomba which is possibly the busiest HEMS base in the State.

Interesting times ahead perhaps.
Al Fentanyl is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2018, 10:33
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Al Fentanyl
..Really? A $17M AW139 at Mt Isa...
cough....closer to $17M USD, plus putting all the good toys in it you won't get much change out of $27M AUD...and I don't know if GST is payable on new aircraft, if so, $30M +. I sure wouldn't want to be the first to put a scratch on the new whirlybird.
gulliBell is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2018, 21:05
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gulliBell
cough....closer to $17M USD, plus putting all the good toys in it you won't get much change out of $27M AUD...and I don't know if GST is payable on new aircraft, if so, $30M +. I sure wouldn't want to be the first to put a scratch on the new whirlybird.
Hmm. You might be thinking of the 225 at those prices..

Brand spankers at $11m USD max according to this source:

bjtonline dot com/aircraft/leonardo-helicopters-aw139

A full SAR EC225 cost in the region of $32m for one well known operator.

And you could always pick up a cheap 2010 machine with around 2000FH for well under $7m USD:

globalair dot com/aircraft-for-sale/ListingDetail/Agusta-AW139?AdId=76902
avtech23 is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2018, 22:56
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Well, a mate of mine bought a new AW139 about 4 or 5 years ago and it was $17M USD. I know, I saw the invoice for it. It had the swanky KL internal fit which added a bit to the price, but not anywhere near as much as a SAR/EMS kit would cost to fit out. Plus any price rises since then.
gulliBell is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2018, 12:02
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Out West
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
$17M? That's small change for the QLD Govt. They have spent more in name changes for their helicopter operation in the past 20 years :-)
Same again is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2018, 19:00
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: australia
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by havick
Just out of curiosity do you actually know how much their current department runs the service for and how much a private contractor could run the same or better service, or are you just floating rumors and hearsay?
Can't quote numbers J, but I can tell you third parties are more expensive. Not rumours or hearsay.

Anyway why do you care about Australian Rotary going ons, you're a fix wing driver in the US now..

a Vic Pol job is coming up soon if you want to try again
mustering guru is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2018, 09:10
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Australia
Age: 47
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree with Gulli-Bell, you'd be looking at around $25-27 Aud for a 139 these days depending on fit out.
belly tank is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2018, 23:21
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Reefdog
A/C -- AW 139
Personnel-- 2 pilot,
Why move from the current model of almost every 139 SAR/EMS operator in Australia?
Tight Anium is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2018, 02:35
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by mustering guru
Can't quote numbers J, but I can tell you third parties are more expensive. Not rumours or hearsay.

Anyway why do you care about Australian Rotary going ons, you're a fix wing driver in the US now..

a Vic Pol job is coming up soon if you want to try again
1) interesting, I always wondered what the comparison might be from govt runs shows to the privateer. In which case why go down the privateer route then if only to cost more and have less control of the operation? Why not just have every state have their own govt air wing like QLD, or just have the army or navy do it like the UK used to? Genuine questions, I’m not stirring the pot here.

2) yes you are correct in my current employment, adulting has got in the way of interesting work. Though, I still fly Helo’s from time to time so still have an interest in them.

3) thanks but no.

Last edited by havick; 4th Jan 2018 at 13:36.
havick is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2018, 07:43
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Out there
Posts: 362
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
In the immortal words of Monty Python

"We lease back the ping machine from the company we sold it too, that way it comes under the monthly current budget and not the capital account."

Think about going to government to ask for $30m in capex expenditure or going to them for a half million a month over five years. I worked for a council some years ago and these people don't think like normal human beings, believe it or not the monthly (even though long term will cost a bunch more) is a much easier sell than $30m in one gulp.
Evil Twin is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2018, 18:28
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Out West
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So long as the 'ex-bush pilots' do not have to converse on the radio, enter controlled airspace, fly IFR or offshore there shouldn't be a problem.
Same again is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2018, 04:14
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Wild West... and Oz
Posts: 866
Received 9 Likes on 2 Posts
Government can do it cheaper than GA...?!
Hahaha happy new year... 😉
How many personal required to run EMQ's Brisbane 139...
BigMike is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2018, 05:12
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Out West
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Your not one of those jealous type pilots that missed out on the best training and Trainers, comrades, the best flying of your life and the best experiences
No - I had a wonderful time in the military.

heaps of us in the ME and Africa.
Yes I know. I've flown with them.
Same again is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2018, 07:13
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I generally hold ex-bush pilots in high regards for their stick and rudder skills. I see no reason why they wouldn't be successful in a complex aircraft like a 139, subject to a thorough pilot initial on type. In the simulator during recurrent checks, when the automation stuff starts breaking down, I find the guys with solid background in stick and rudder flying usually manage a bit better (on average) than pilots who have been brought up mostly pushing buttons in helicopters.
gulliBell is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2018, 07:35
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
My main concern with putting ex-bush pilots in a 139 would be whether they had a strong background in night flying, which many don't have. Particularly for the EMS/SAR role where you really need to have it all together when operating at night.
BTW, I never gave anybody a double gen failure in IFR...so whoever did that to you probably thought you were doing OK up to that point and decided to crank up the heat more than usual.
gulliBell is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.