Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

SAR S-92 Missing Ireland

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

SAR S-92 Missing Ireland

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Mar 2017, 13:20
  #361 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is a very sad story. Experiences and well known crew who were appreciated by all their peers. My sympathies to their collegues anf families.

Many of you are asking why they did an approach to BlackRock when in fact they wanted to take fuel at BlackSod. I think because of the weather, the ceiling was to low to do any kind of approach at Blacksod, therefore the crew elected to do an approach similar to a NDB ARA at BlackRock, and then proceed VFR/NVG to Blacksod. The reason they didn't do the similar approach at Blacksod is normally a NDB ARA have to be at a certain distance from shore to comply with obstacles clearance (between 10 n.m. and 14n.m.). For me it show that way the crew knew exactly what they were doing.

My two cents.
FH
FlyingHead is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 14:34
  #362 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: US
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Questions on Survival Vests

As a former SAR pilot and RCC worker I was wondering if anyone can help with these questions regarding the survival vests worn by Irish CG crew:

What type survival beacon(s)/radios are carried in the vests?

I thought I saw on one posting that their survival beacon is a manual activation type; is that correct? Or is it an automatic type that activates upon immersion?

Is the inflatable part of the vest equipped with an AIS Man Overboard type beacon that activates upon inflation?

Replies to the thread ok with me or you can send it privately to me.

My condolences to all; especially to the families.
Redhawk 83 is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 14:46
  #363 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: EGAB
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Flying Head,

How come they never flew near BlackSOD though if this was the case?

Looking at AIS data there were about 5nm south of BlackSOD on track to BlackROCK. At no point on ATC or Coast Guard frequency did they say that they were approaching BlackROCK to get visual. 2 minutes before the crash as they commenced the 180 degrees turn the said that they were approaching BlackSOD. This indicates to me that the crew may have thought that they were approaching BlackSOD instead.

Just my interpretation of the evidence so far and I'm sure I could be far from the truth.
GJOYT is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 14:50
  #364 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,327
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Flying Head - it maybe that they were using a legacy procedure that pre-dated the S-92, something that they used to do in that area in the S-61.

The S-92 is far more capable and could have easily conducted a letdown without routing via Blackrock but maybe it was just what they were used to doing.

I start to wonder if the AIS track West of Blackrock is just an anomaly and that they never went that far away from the rock before water impact - if there really was that much damage to the aircraft after hitting the rock then it would seem to have to render it unflyable.

As for the survival aspects, it is certainly possible to release your harness and egress the aircraft yet drown on the way to the surface - I don't know if Dara's lifejacket was inflated or not.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 15:02
  #365 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Belfast
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was just wondering could the Coastguard Controllers at Malin Head or Valentia who may be looking at Rescue 116 on their live AIS screens have contacted them on Marine Frequency and asked them why they were at Blackrock and not Blacksod or would they not get involved when they are going to land
Thunderbirdsix is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 15:05
  #366 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: At home
Posts: 503
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
If the report about the radio call ''landing in Blacksod'' is correct, why would they do so as far out as about 10 NM from destination?
Nubian is online now  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 15:07
  #367 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi GJOYT, if you know the weather is to low at Blacksod, why fly over, or like CRAB said maybe a pre dated procedure have been used. I think at this stage all theory are valid to a certain point. I hope the CVR/FDR will answer most of the questions!

Cheers
FH
FlyingHead is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 16:07
  #368 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I heard that Dara's life jacket was inflated and helmet was not on.... upon recovery...

Last edited by Flapwing; 21st Mar 2017 at 16:09. Reason: Spelling
Flapwing is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 17:08
  #369 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: South Coast, UK
Age: 67
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the cloud base is 200-300 feet how can you explain using Black Rock at 275 odd feet for routing in towards Blacksod at 40 odd feet?
catch21 is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 17:42
  #370 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Gone
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AAIU Statement.

AAIU Statement: AAIU Investigation into the loss of R116 | AAIU.ie
electrotor is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 17:52
  #371 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi catch21, I thought the ceiling was a little bit higher.
FlyingHead is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 18:31
  #372 (permalink)  
Ber Nooly
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by FlyingHead
Hi catch21, I thought the ceiling was a little bit higher.
Belmullet (30 km to the northeast, 9 m amsl) was Overcast at 300 ft. Mace Head, 80 km to the southeast of Blackrock, was Overcast 400 ft but down to 200 ft 1 hour later.
 
Old 21st Mar 2017, 18:38
  #373 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by catch21
If the cloud base is 200-300 feet how can you explain using Black Rock at 275 odd feet for routing in towards Blacksod at 40 odd feet?
How would they know exactly what the ceiling was at Blackrock, there is no weather reporting at that site.
oleary is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 19:43
  #374 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: EU
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Last couple of hours Granuaile has been operating close to Blackrock. Hope they launched ROV, some divers, or better.

Wind is currently 10kn was 30.
Red5ive is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 19:58
  #375 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems we are presuming that there is no weather reporting at Blacksod - when I asked this some time ago no-one responded. Given that this is one of the few refuelling points on the north west coast and the presumably frequent poor weather, this is surely a major omission, the modest cost of which must be justified in the future. Furthermore, does anyone know if there was any ground to air RT at Blacksod? It's hard to believe a simple hand held receiver was not in use, but there again I have seen no reports of comms here.

And then we come to the critical issue of navigation. Given that there is a significant chance that this aircraft was not where its crew thought it was, I am astonished to gather from some posts that there is a possibility this S92 did not have a moving map display in the cockpit? Is this really the case? It seems incredible if so that a $20m aircraft can have less such kit than most single engined VFR helis. And such an omission may well be a major contributory factor in this accident.

Last edited by rotorspeed; 21st Mar 2017 at 20:35.
rotorspeed is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 20:08
  #376 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Belfast
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is weather reporting at Blacksod and the comms are marine VHF, I have heard other Helicopters going in for fuel at other times asking for the latest weather and visibility as they are coming in,there is also a remotely operated Coastguard Station at nearby Belmullet operated by Malin Head Coastguard Station
Thunderbirdsix is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 20:10
  #377 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Ireland
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blacksod has an automatic weather station 10 miles from the lighthouse. It used to be at the lighthouse and it was the Blacksod Lighthouse forecast that they relied on to give the Go-ahead for the D-Day landings.
Marama is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 20:19
  #378 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok good, so does anyone have any idea what the reported vis and cloudbase was at Blacksod around the time of the accident?
rotorspeed is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 20:21
  #379 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: EU
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Thunderbirdsix
There is weather reporting at Blacksod and the comms are marine VHF, I have heard other Helicopters going in for fuel at other times asking for the latest weather and visibility as they are coming in,there is also a remotely operated Coastguard Station at nearby Belmullet operated by Malin Head Coastguard Station
Belmullet Automatic is listed here
Coastal Reports - Met Éireann - The Irish Meteorological Service Online
Red5ive is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 20:25
  #380 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Belfast
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rotorspeed
Ok good, so does anyone have any idea what the reported vis and cloudbase was at Blacksod around the time of the accident?
Someone posted a while back that the cloud base on the night was 300 feet don't have any other info
Thunderbirdsix is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.