Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Mexico Hughes 500 wirestrike (?) fatal

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Mexico Hughes 500 wirestrike (?) fatal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Mar 2017, 06:08
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Well that's pretty conclusive.
How terrible.
tartare is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2017, 09:18
  #22 (permalink)  

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 4,694
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
To learn from this ...

... I'm not sure if it is something generally taught or even talked about, but something I was told very early on; always cross wires at a pylon.

Of course in this incident they may not have seen the power lines or pylons. In the vid linked to below, from 1:00 the Director of Firemen tells us that it was the third time they had flown that route.
Four dead in helicopter crash near Mt. Signal - KYMA
SilsoeSid is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2017, 12:02
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
... I'm not sure if it is something generally taught or even talked about, but something I was told very early on; always cross wires at a pylon.
That´s what my FI taught to me also.


But there may be situations or sites when/where you cannot stick to this general rule...


Thracian
Thracian is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2017, 12:41
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,321
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Then in those cases you should keep well away from the wires. In this case the weather seemed fine and there seems no reason to descend into the wires. Very sad.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2017, 13:36
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: SW England
Age: 69
Posts: 1,496
Received 89 Likes on 35 Posts
Can't always do that, Crab - some jobs involve being close to other, lower powerlines then crossing taller ones.

Our rule is to identify the limit of exploitation toward the higher line, stop, climb and cross the higher lines when in level or climbing flight (not always at a pylon, but with both crew confirming we're above the highest point of the 'threat' line) then when tail confirmed clear descend and resume work on the lower powerline.
Thud_and_Blunder is online now  
Old 16th Mar 2017, 16:38
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Europe
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having done some flying in similar environment I guess they weren't aware of the wires and - because they were looking out of (not like the Video into!!) the blue sky they didn't see the wires over the brown ground. Sad accident😳
evil7 is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2017, 17:40
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Florida
Age: 52
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As an ag pilot I deal with wires all the time. About 95% of the fields that I spray have wires either running through them, or are bordered on one or more sides by them.
Although people don't believe it, I have found that it is incredibly easy to simply 'forget' that the wires are there, even though I have crossed them countless times whilst spraying a field. When they blend in with the background it makes it even harder to deal with. The fact that they were on their third run leads me to believe that they may have simply forgot the wires were there, or they were looking at the main wires and forgot about the static line, as I have done on many occasions.

There but for grace of God go I.......a very sobering accident as we are getting ready to start our season in a week or so.
vaqueroaero is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2017, 19:04
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,321
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Thud - very valid if your job is to work the power lines but these guys were on the way back from a rescue in what looks like good weather - they should have just given the wires a wide berth or crossed them at a pylon - basics really.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2017, 19:39
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK and MALTA
Age: 61
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 4 Posts
Or maybe cruised at a height that would allow them to chill out. MSA on a good VFR day is a stress free decision.
DOUBLE BOGEY is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 00:24
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 714
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
not a whole lot more that could have been done after the initial tangle with the wire.
Are you a pilot? Throttle off to stop the yaw, collective down and autorotate to the ground. Like Moffatt did in Hong Kong harbor with the 139. Why you train emergencies.
malabo is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 01:47
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Kansas
Age: 37
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Malabo, Yes I am a pilot with almost 5,000 hours, with a vast majority in very low altitude flight profiles/ wire environments. If you watch the video I linked, it is clear that after the ground wire was severed by the tail rotor, it then wrapped around TRGB, and caused the loss of the tail rotor assembly. The cable then remained attached to the tailboom. once the aircraft began to spin it caused the main rotor and cable to entangle which caused the failure of the main rotor and loss of control. after getting the tail wrapped, its my personal opinion that recovery may have been difficult or impossible. obviously keep fighting till the end, but unfortunately this may have unavoidable after contact and entanglement.
army_av8r is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 02:24
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,933
Received 392 Likes on 207 Posts
Like Moffatt did in Hong Kong harbo
Off thread. Where is young Richard these days malabo?
megan is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 03:47
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 714
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by megan
Off thread. Where is young Richard these days malabo?
Brunei Shell
malabo is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 05:46
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK and MALTA
Age: 61
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 4 Posts
Malabo.....are you a pilot. The procedure you describe would be somewhat ineffective at low speed a few hundred feet from the ground which where they were when the TR depart eventually departed.
DOUBLE BOGEY is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 13:27
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by malabo
Are you a pilot? Throttle off to stop the yaw, collective down and autorotate to the ground. Like Moffatt did in Hong Kong harbor with the 139. Why you train emergencies.
Have you forgotten the drastic C of G change when the T/R and GB departed the ship? He had a lot more to worry about than simple yaw!
Ricktye is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 15:35
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
When the gearbox and tail rotor depart the CofG shift will cause the nose to drop. The automatic reaction of the pilot is to pull back on the cyclic to correct. The lowers the rear of the rotor disc into the canted up tailboom and general destruction follows.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 22:08
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ross-on-Wye
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry M ... in spite of the advice offered by many Flight Manuals, establishing a simple autorotation following T/R failure WILL NOT produce a safe touch down. Yes ... a first vital action is to get rid of the cause of the yaw - the engine - but if no further action is taken the airframe commences a yaw in the direction of the main blades and it doesn't matter much if you strike the ground spinning left or right, the impact will hurt. Unhappily or happily, I've experienced three T/R failures and managed a non-damaging run-on landing on each occasion ... an experience that at least taught me something. For a non-damaging landing on the more popular types, a combination of speed, yaw angle and power needs to be used, an emergency exercise I teach to my new pilots when asked. Safe flying to all please. DRK.
Dennis Kenyon is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 23:34
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have to agree with D.Kenyon, mind you the situation was different from the video, didn't loose anything but simply stop working. My reaction was to pick up speed right away, i had speed to start with, just got some more and the aircraft straightened itsel or just about and went back to the airport for a successful running landing. Lucky me it was winter and the airstrip was gravel and hard pack snow. Took a while before stopping but it did before the ditch.
Aircraft was a FH1100.

JD
fijdor is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.