R66 crash in Wikieup, Arizona, U.S.A., kills 2
Thread Starter
R66 crash in Wikieup, Arizona, U.S.A., kills 2
Helicopter crash in Wikieup kills 2 | 12NEWS.com
Police release believed identities of helicopter crash victims | 12NEWS.com
The Robinson R66 helicopter crashed Thursday afternoon (23 June 2016) while flying from Prescott to Riverside, California. Search crews found the wreckage of the helicopter early Friday morning. Authorities said the helicopter burned after crashing.
Here is a picture of the crash site; it looks like the Mohave Desert:
2 dead after helicopter crash near Wikieup - azfamily.com 3TV | Phoenix Breaking News, Weather, Sport
Time of crash is reported "afternoon". The flight was reported overdue on Friday 12:22 am only. It is not clear whether it crashed during legal daylight still, or at night.
Police release believed identities of helicopter crash victims | 12NEWS.com
The Robinson R66 helicopter crashed Thursday afternoon (23 June 2016) while flying from Prescott to Riverside, California. Search crews found the wreckage of the helicopter early Friday morning. Authorities said the helicopter burned after crashing.
Here is a picture of the crash site; it looks like the Mohave Desert:
2 dead after helicopter crash near Wikieup - azfamily.com 3TV | Phoenix Breaking News, Weather, Sport
Time of crash is reported "afternoon". The flight was reported overdue on Friday 12:22 am only. It is not clear whether it crashed during legal daylight still, or at night.
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?sto...94600284090101
Looks like some of the upper guys at Guidance. Sad to see this.
Looks like some of the upper guys at Guidance. Sad to see this.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western US
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very tragic RIP . Unsubstantiated chatter on another internet forum indicated early thoughts were of mast bumping. In any case, from the NTSB preliminary report:
The helicopter came to rest in hilly desert terrain. The debris field was about 750 yards long and 150 yards wide. One of the first pieces identified was the outboard 5 feet of a main rotor blade afterbody that had separated from the leading edge spar. The left side of the helicopter was more fragmented than the right, and left side cabin pieces and instruments were distributed throughout the early part of the debris field. The tail boom was about midway into the debris field. The left side/nose cabin was in the same approximate part of the debris field with a straight separation line across one side. The cabin came to rest inverted about 600 yards into the debris field, and was destroyed by a postcrash fire. The engine remained attached to the cabin. The remaining piece of main rotor blade was about the same distance into the debris field, but 85 yards left of the debris path centerline. The transmission, mast, and second main rotor blade separated as a unit, and were about 100 yards past the cabin area in the direction of the centerline of the debris field.
Well, after that sobering description of the wreckage path/distribution there is realistically very little doubt that it is another tragic case of Mast Bumping.
But Robinson won't move away from their MR head design, despite how susceptible it is to this phenomenon.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Florida
Age: 52
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How does one gather mast bumping from that? It seems that another possibility would be a blade failure. It wouldn't be the first time that's happened in a Robinson product.
Tim Brown was a highly experienced pilot, a master of the utility world. He spent many hours sock pulling in the wire environment. That he died in straight and level flight is a cruel end to a highly accomplished career.
Tim Brown was a highly experienced pilot, a master of the utility world. He spent many hours sock pulling in the wire environment. That he died in straight and level flight is a cruel end to a highly accomplished career.
Crab, Bell haven't moved from their 206 head design either.
Crab, Bell haven't moved from their 206 head design either.
They may be a lot to be said in favour of twin bladed tethering Bells, from space savings in the hangar, over cool blade sound till great Bell customer service. But tethering rotor heads are stupid, dangerous, early ages designs. It should not be possible to get a new aircraft design certified using them.
Thread Starter
I agree. However straight and level at VNE can turn in a blink into exceedance of VNE. What do we actually know? Does anybody know the time of departure, estimated time of accident, t/o weight, and weather en-route?
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very tragic indeed and sad that people are still buying and flying these things.
Reely, agree with your theory on teetering heads but no one in authority is
listening. For some, price seems more important than safety.
Reely, agree with your theory on teetering heads but no one in authority is
listening. For some, price seems more important than safety.
A great many hours have been flown safely on semi-rigid rotor systems.
Recently, people seem to hit problems at speed in turbulent conditions. This would appear to be more of a problem with education than the architecture of the machine.
Recently, people seem to hit problems at speed in turbulent conditions. This would appear to be more of a problem with education than the architecture of the machine.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yea Yea, Robinson offer this rather pathetic explanation / excuse also, but please
remember these were two very experienced guys. If it could happen to them it could happen
to most of us. --very very tragic indeed.
Surely a major re- design to that head and blade system is badly overdue. Please somebody
in authority take action before further unnecessary loss of life.
remember these were two very experienced guys. If it could happen to them it could happen
to most of us. --very very tragic indeed.
Surely a major re- design to that head and blade system is badly overdue. Please somebody
in authority take action before further unnecessary loss of life.
Last edited by claudia; 10th Jul 2016 at 17:28.
claudia
i think that applies to twin engine given how dangerous they are
you can strike your boom in anything if you try hard enough
i think that applies to twin engine given how dangerous they are
you can strike your boom in anything if you try hard enough
Which other manufacturer has to run safety courses for its products because they kill so many unsuspecting pilots??
Some or most?
Whilst all teetering head helos can be susceptible to mast bumping - few can get it badly enough to cut off the tail boom or skids with the frequency of that particular manufacturer.
Originally Posted by [email protected]
Whilst all teetering head helos can be susceptible to mast bumping - few can get it badly enough to cut off the tail boom or skids with the frequency of that particular manufacturer.