Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

EC225 crash near Bergen, Norway April 2016

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

EC225 crash near Bergen, Norway April 2016

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th May 2016, 05:42
  #621 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Balmullo,Scotland
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Plt i think you are mistaken duplicate and independent several years ago I was the QAM of a now defunct small airline and whilst auditing a work pack noticed that the same engineer was indeed duplicate inspecting his own work when I pulled him up on it and I quote 'we can do this as long as we go for a coffee after the first inspection' the job was fitting a propeller.So unless things have changed in recent years the original quote was correct.
matkat is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 06:29
  #622 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 312
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50
@roundwego: How many fasteners attach the BBQ plate to the transmission deck?
Also: just FYI, three of the four office chairs in my house, and most of the office chairs in the office where I work, have five rolling wheels. It appears to have become a standard among certain office furniture manufacturers.

For lowfat: link was very informative/useful.
BBQ plate has lots of fasteners, don't know exactly how many. I am not suggesting the fastness became detached, just trying to illustrate that there are many other failure modes than the support struts and their attachment points.

Ref. Office chairs, I guess you are talking about the single leg with five feet ones.
roundwego is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 06:54
  #623 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Nuremberg (metropol region)
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Office chairs, I guess you are talking about the single leg with five feet ones.
Let’s say truss elements, mechanical the very same result as a „penta-pod“.
AW009 is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 09:40
  #624 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ecosse
Age: 44
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Office chairs with five legs !!!! What office do you work in?

Three legs provide perfect stability. Have you never been in a restaurant at a table which rocks from side to side? Chances are it had four legs. Remove one leg and it will be rock steady.
roundwego, loving your comments! so true though. It seems to happen to me 9 times out of 10 at a restaurant/cafe. Quick fix folding a napkin & putting it under the affected leg & works every time! Sorry to divert from the main topic of discussion people but its nice to break the ice a little from time to time. A little humour does go a long way!

Also, I've yet to see someone on here who uses there real name! Someone must have? Chances are a lot of us know each other already or heard the name. Plus there probably wouldn't be as much criticsim amongst eachother!! It would be interesting though
Beaucoup Movement is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 10:53
  #625 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pltnorway
This is not correct. The same rules apply in Norway. Duplicate inspections are required.
As long as a break is taken between the original and duplicate inspection then the same person can carry out both according to Norwegian regs. Unless this has changed recently then that is still the case.
SMW72 is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 11:03
  #626 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Berkshire, UK
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts
3 legged chairs don't rock but the legs need to stick out much further to give stability against tipping over. 4 legs don't need to stick out as far and 5 legs can stick out less again, for the same stability. It's all about the size of the footprint and the amount of material used in the construction. After that the number of legs starts to add to the amount of material used and is less cost effective. Having more legs does not mean that each leg can be less solid as any 2 legs need to be able to support the weight at the point of tipping over. Of course, once you get more than 3 legs you need to have a flat floor to stand it on to prevent rocking.
rans6andrew is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 11:08
  #627 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Nuremberg (metropol region)
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

@Beaucoup Movement: Truss elements are characterized by being fixed at both sides. Sad to say this will differ sometime in helicopters. We are debating applications of forces, bending loads, shearing forces, vibrations and redundancies (!!!) and no coasters under a table-leg.

Regardless to your graspable sense of humour, your theory is misleading in Newtonian mechanics. But not only by Newton I insist in a ’Penta-pod’; for each rotor blade one leg (suspension bar)
AW009 is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 11:43
  #628 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
3 legged chairs don't rock but the legs need to stick out much further to give stability against tipping over. 4 legs don't need to stick out as far and 5 legs can stick out less again,
The Alexander Kielland was a 'penta' semisub; i.e. it floated on five circular pontoons. When one leg support failed it capsized with the loss of 123 lives.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexan...and_(platform)
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 12:27
  #629 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,247
Received 330 Likes on 183 Posts
Norwegian and UK CAAs extend restrictions to L2

Following the tragic Norwegian Super Puma helicopter accident on Friday 29 April, the UK and Norwegian Civil Aviation Authorities have been collaborating very closely and are united in their approach.




Shortly after the accident, both organisations introduced restrictions to the Airbus EC225LP helicopter to prevent operators using it for commercial flights. Both organisations have now also agreed to extend the scope of the restriction to include the AS332L2 Super Puma helicopter until further information is available. The decision to extend the restriction is based on the close similarities between the two types of helicopter and neither helicopter can be used by either UK or Norwegian operators for commercial flights.

The restrictions do not apply to search and rescue flights.

The accident remains under investigation by the Norwegian authorities and we remain in close contact with all offshore helicopter operators to continue to assess the situation.
The Norwegian CAA and UK CAA introducing restrictions to the AS332L2 Super Puma -
212man is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 12:46
  #630 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: 'Stralia
Age: 58
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Three legs provide perfect stability. Have you never been in a restaurant at a table which rocks from side to side? Chances are it had four legs. Remove one leg and it will be rock steady.
@Roundwego .....

Strange but True: Turning a Wobbly Table Will Make It Steady - Scientific American

Peter3127 is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 13:19
  #631 (permalink)  
PJ2
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: BC
Age: 76
Posts: 2,484
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have read the entire thread with great interest (fixed wing transport pilot, (ret'd), not a heli pilot), and have a basic question in re the missing pin theory - has the presence of all three (six, really) suspension rod-end pins with their two "nappy" retaining pins been confirmed yet? Are there any remnants of the barbecue plate attached to any of the three rods?

Re the loss of one of the three points of suspension and retaining control over the machine, the chair examples are, of course, in compression - if we are suspending a load from three points and one point breaks, the "system" will take up a new physical position defined by the two remaining points of suspension and the vertical loads, (plus the complex mixture of loads offered by the rotating mass as the rotor "disc" changes position), unless some vertical load-bearing capability is retained, if even for a short while, by the MRH/MRG structure, (familiarity with these components only gained by the descriptions of the structure as posted or linked on the thread).

PJ2

Last edited by PJ2; 11th May 2016 at 14:50. Reason: syntax
PJ2 is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 13:30
  #632 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Nuremberg (metropol region)
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@Fareastdriver: Do you want to tease me, do you? Or would you even tell me the five pontons of the “penta-platform Alexander L. Kielland“ had been fixed non-positive (by mechanics, e.g. by bolts & nappy pins) direct to the ocean bottom?
Please take notice: For AS332L2 Super Puma I insist as optimum in a ’quatro-pod’. Don’t wonder why? Mnemonic might be the answer.

@212man:
„Shortly after the accident, both organisations introduced restrictions to the Airbus EC225LP helicopter to prevent operators using it for commercial flights. Both organisations have now also agreed to extend the scope of the restriction to include the AS332L2 Super Puma helicopter until further information is available“.
Congratulations to both organisations for their hard-line posture.
AW009 is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 13:42
  #633 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oooop North
Posts: 94
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Regs

Sorry, I am abit confused.
Isn't Norway part of EASA ? and the maintenance carried out iaw Part145
Therefore how come you have different regulations relating to Independent Inspections !
I have heard of this practice in the USA but never in EASA Land


Can someone please explain

Sorry, I retract my above comment, I thought Norway was under EASA Regs. My apology.


Keepitup

Last edited by Keepitup; 11th May 2016 at 14:05.
Keepitup is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 14:28
  #634 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Inside the Industry
Posts: 876
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
212 Man

Very interesting.

I wonder if they are beginning to see evidence of a similar failure mode to REDL in 2009? I hope not.
industry insider is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 14:38
  #635 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: California
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by buzz66
Can't be a Sus Bar failure because the Gearbox split in 2 parts.
Sus Bar or Pin failure would see the Barby Plate and whole gearbox leave the scene. Almost has to be major Gear failure internal to the Gbox.
I bet my bottom dollar they are the bits they want to still find.
If the front suspension bar becomes loose, the engines will hold the bottom of the mgb from the front. Since it's not really designed to work that way, it will eventually separate.
jccmj1 is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 15:56
  #636 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PJ2
I have read the entire thread with great interest (fixed wing transport pilot, (ret'd), not a heli pilot), and have a basic question in re the missing pin theory - has the presence of all three (six, really) suspension rod-end pins with their two "nappy" retaining pins been confirmed yet? Are there any remnants of the barbecue plate attached to any of the three rods?

Re the loss of one of the three points of suspension and retaining control over the machine, the chair examples are, of course, in compression - if we are suspending a load from three points and one point breaks, the "system" will take up a new physical position defined by the two remaining points of suspension and the vertical loads, (plus the complex mixture of loads offered by the rotating mass as the rotor "disc" changes position), unless some vertical load-bearing capability is retained, if even for a short while, by the MRH/MRG structure, (familiarity with these components only gained by the descriptions of the structure as posted or linked on the thread).

PJ2
The suspension bars don't attach to the barbeque plate. They attach to the gearbox at one end and the aircraft structure at the other. The bottom of the gearbox is the only thing that attaches to the barbeque plate and the barbeque plate is attached directly to the transmission deck at two different points fwd rh and aft lh. Both of these points are attached through the airframe. Hope this helps?
SMW72 is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 16:13
  #637 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Balmullo,Scotland
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keepitup, you can only understand my confusion on this especially concerning when I asked the UK CAA for guidance which was duly sent which I showed the accountable Manager who advised 'thats not how it is done here' I left shortly after that.
matkat is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 16:17
  #638 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Balmullo,Scotland
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But how could that possibly be controlled again think difference between duplicate and independants and more concerning how the NCAA can bypass top level requirements of EASA
matkat is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 16:36
  #639 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Nuremberg (metropol region)
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
…. you don't know whether to cry or to curse in rage?

Berlin/Oslo (dpa) - Der Absturz eines Eurocopter-Hubschraubers an der Küste Norwegens hat nach Angaben der deutschen Luftwaffe keine Auswirkungen auf die Flugbereitschaft der Bundeswehr. «Das in Norwegen eingesetzte Modell H-225 Super Puma - auch Eurocopter EC 225 - haben wir nicht im Bestand», sagte ein Luftwaffensprecher am Samstag [30. April 2016] der Deutschen Presse-Agentur in Berlin. «Es ergeben sich daher keine Konsequenzen, irgendwelche Überprüfungen an unseren Helikoptern [Cougar AS-532-L2] durchzuführen oder gar den Flugbetrieb mit Hubschraubern der Flugbereitschaft einzustellen.»

Translation: Berlin / Oslo (dpa) - According to the German Air Force, the crash of a Eurocopter helicopter on the coast of Norway, does not affect the Special Air Mission Wing of the German Ministry of Defence (BMVg) to the Bundeswehr (German armed forces). «The Model H-225 Super Puma - Eurocopter EC 225 operated in Norway we do not have in stock,» an Air Force spokesman said on Saturday [30th of April, 2016] to the German Press Agency in Berlin. «Therefore no consequences are resulting to execute any savety inspections on our helicopters or even suspending flight operations with helicopters [Cougar AS-532-L2] of the the Special Air Mission [and VIP-] Wing of the German Ministry of Defence to the Bundeswehr»

…. paper pusher!

Last edited by AW009; 12th May 2016 at 06:13. Reason: spelling mistake
AW009 is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 17:00
  #640 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Keepitup
Sorry, I am abit confused.
Isn't Norway part of EASA ? and the maintenance carried out iaw Part145
Therefore how come you have different regulations relating to Independent Inspections !
I have heard of this practice in the USA but never in EASA Land


Can someone please explain

Sorry, I retract my above comment, I thought Norway was under EASA Regs. My apology.


Keepitup
They sort of are but aren't. They are associate members of EASA. They have no voting rights to amend the legislation.
SMW72 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.