Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

24th Feb 2016: EC 135 crash in northern germany

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

24th Feb 2016: EC 135 crash in northern germany

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Mar 2016, 02:02
  #21 (permalink)  

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 4,694
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
Have the UK police fitted cockpit voice recorders and HUMS following the Glasgow crash? It was a AAIB recommendation I believe.
"Safety Recommendations
4.1 Safety Recommendations
The following Safety Recommendations have been made:
.
.
Safety Recommendation 2015-031
It is recommended that, when the Civil Aviation Authority require a radio altimeter to be fitted to a helicopter operating under a Police Air Operator’s Certificate, it also stipulates that the equipment is capable of being powered in all phases of flight, including emergency situations, without intervention by the crew.

Safety Recommendation 2015 - 032
It is recommended that the Civil Aviation Authority requires all helicopters operating under a Police Air Operators Certificate, and first issued with an individual Certificate of Airworthiness before 1 January 2018, to be equipped with a recording capability that captures data, audio and images in crash survivable memory. They should, as far as reasonably practicable, record at least the parameters specified in The Air Navigation Order, Schedule 4, Scale SS(1) or SS(3) as appropriate. They should be capable of recording at least the last two hours of (a) communications by the crew, including Police Observers carried in support of the helicopter’s operation, and (b) images of the cockpit environment. The image recordings should have sufficient coverage, quality and frame rate characteristics to include actions by the crew, control selections and instrument displays that are not captured by the data recorder. The audio and image recorders should be capable of operating for at least 10 minutes after the loss of the normal electrical supply.

Safety Recommendation 2015-033
It is recommended that the Civil Aviation Authority requires all helicopters operating under a Police Air Operators Certificate, and first issued with an individual Certificate of Airworthiness on or after 1 January 2018, to be fitted with flight recorders that record data, audio and images in crash-survivable memory. These should record at least the parameters specified in The Air Navigation Order, Schedule 4, Scale SS(1) or SS(3), as appropriate. They should be capable of recording at least the last two hours of (a) communications by the crew, including Police Observers carried in support of the helicopter’s operation, and (b) cockpit image recordings. The image recordings should have sufficient coverage, quality and frame rate characteristics to include control selections and instrument displays that are not captured by the other data recorders. The audio and image recorders should be capable of operating for at least 10 minutes after the loss of the normal electrical supply.
"


The answer to the question is No.

Isn't it something that I have equipment in my car, bought off the shelf from Maplins, that would cover the above recommendations (apart from the Rad Alt).


How many EC135's have crashed since they (the recommendations) were introduced?
Since 23 October 2015 there have been 3 'crashes' involving the 135 series.;
https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase...hp?AcType=EC35

Private - Australia
Jordan Public Security Department - Jordan
Bundespolizei - Germany

The only one that the recommendations would apply to, apparently already had the recommended kit fitted. (see Spunk's post above)


recommend
rɛkəˈmɛnd
verb
past tense: recommended; past participle: recommended
1.
put forward (someone or something) with approval as being suitable for a particular purpose or role.
2.
archaic
commend or entrust someone or something to (someone).
SilsoeSid is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2016, 07:06
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: nice house
Age: 57
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's very quiet on this subject.......not something I'm used to on this forum.....usually lots of opinions on every subject, but not so on this one....
Any (preliminary) findings to be expected from BFU anytime soon?
yellowbird135 is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2016, 12:18
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Until now there's nothing new. Even in the german aviation forums I usually track (flugzeugforum.de, helionline.de, ...) there's nothing.

Well, I know a guy at the BFU and just sent him an email about the progress of the investigation. Now I'm waiting for his response.

Thracian
Thracian is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2016, 19:19
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It's a federal police a/c in the land of the manufacturer and in the land with the greatest EC135 fleet. 3 important reasons for the quitness. Nobody there wants wild speculations in public about that mission and the crash.

No informations will come out of this closed circle of accident board, police officers and manufacturer before the investigations are finished. A preliminary Report can be awaited in some months.
tecpilot is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2016, 00:31
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Vancouver,WA.
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No post crash fire...
Max Power 3503e is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2016, 06:02
  #26 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the big blue planet
Posts: 1,027
Received 24 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Max Power 3503e
No post crash fire...
If you want to suggest "no fuel" , the bladdertanks of the 135 are crashresistant, there were several crashes where it was prooved.

skadi
skadi is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2016, 11:53
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tecpilot
A preliminary Report can be awaited in some months.
Yep, according to my "source", the monthly bulletin (in which all incidents of a month are described with a preliminary result or the current state of the investigations) for February will be published somewhere in May, maybe June.

Thracian
Thracian is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2016, 23:01
  #28 (permalink)  

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 4,694
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
Thracian, any chance of finding a source with some actual information?

In the meantime, I'll be having omlettes with Harry Palmer

SilsoeSid is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2016, 05:50
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SilsoeSid
Thracian, any chance of finding a source with some actual information?

Sid, he said that they already have worked out a scenario as "most likely" according to the available data and the progress of the investigation, but in his first response he unfortunately didn´t tell me any details...
Waiting for his second


And as I´m currently not living in Braunschweig (the city where the BFU is located) anymore, I´m not able to meet him for a beer or two at the airport restaurant.
Next time I´ll be visiting Germany again, the bulletin should already be published


Thracian
Thracian is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2016, 09:42
  #30 (permalink)  

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 4,694
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
It's very quiet on this subject.......not something I'm used to on this forum.....usually lots of opinions on every subject, but not so on this one....
Probably because we don't want to have to go through all the same things again, such as;


May be the known Rad Alt failure due to the shed bus problem without generators after the loss or the switch off of the engines. Can't see good chances to open the very unfortunately placed shed bus switch in pitch black night and dark cockpit while wearing NVGs autorotating from a few hundred feets. Additionally the 2D view through the NVGs.


I notice that it was another T2+
SilsoeSid is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2016, 14:32
  #31 (permalink)  

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 4,694
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
May be the known Rad Alt failure due to the shed bus problem without generators after the loss or the switch off of the engines. Can't see good chances to open the very unfortunately placed shed bus switch in pitch black night and dark cockpit while wearing NVGs autorotating from a few hundred feets. Additionally the 2D view through the NVGs.
Sorry, what was the problem with the shed bus?
SilsoeSid is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2016, 15:48
  #32 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the big blue planet
Posts: 1,027
Received 24 Likes on 12 Posts
Deleted

skadi
skadi is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2016, 20:54
  #33 (permalink)  

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 4,694
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
... is it really different in the T2+ and if so, why?
SilsoeSid is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2016, 04:56
  #34 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the big blue planet
Posts: 1,027
Received 24 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by SilsoeSid
... is it really different in the T2+ and if so, why?
No, it isn't!

skadi
skadi is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2016, 05:37
  #35 (permalink)  

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 4,694
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
So how come the Rad Alt on the P2+ is on the Essential Bus Bar?
SilsoeSid is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2016, 08:32
  #36 (permalink)  

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 4,694
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
D-HVBB is serial number 0146.

G-SASA - 0147
G-SCAA - 0151
G-BZRS - 0166
G-GWAA - 0174
G-KRNW - 0175
(G-WCAO - 0204)

Are we to assume that these airframes lose their rad alt in the event of both generators going offline? At what stage in the production line was the rad alt placed on the Ess Bus Bar and what caused that change?

Air ambulances are now more involved with night/24hr ops: will there be any retro changes or is there now so much money in the aa world that they can simply buy a different airframe


(well, someone said it was quiet here)
SilsoeSid is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2016, 17:44
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: nice house
Age: 57
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Sid,

I truly appreciate it
yellowbird135 is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2016, 12:54
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Germany
Age: 53
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is the Rad Alt discussion really worth being looked at in an area where AGL is more or less the same as MSL?
Spunk is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2016, 13:36
  #39 (permalink)  

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 4,694
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
"Check height"

Is the Rad Alt discussion really worth being looked at in an area where AGL is more or less the same as MSL?
I think that little bit of 'more or less' might sometimes make quite a big difference.

Do Bar Alts give audio clues these days and the lag reduced to such a degree that in auto or in high rod that you would consider it more beneficial than a rad alt in areas of low lying ground?

Be interesting to hear how the Dutch would undertake autos at night in Mr S's world.
SilsoeSid is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2016, 15:20
  #40 (permalink)  

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 4,694
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
Is the Rad Alt discussion really worth being looked at in an area where AGL is more or less the same as MSL?
S, with the average elevation around Bad Bramstedt being 12 metres / 49 feet, and some sites reporting areas of 18.74 metres / 62 feet, how would you substantiate your statement quoted above?
SilsoeSid is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.