Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

UH-60 with "bad" rotor blade

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

UH-60 with "bad" rotor blade

Old 12th Dec 2014, 12:41
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 598
Being an old pre-AWC blade (Sans anhedral or taper) , the main pickled titanium spar was left intact (doesn't even look that the BIM blanket was exposed or that they popped the schrader valve) and the leading edge sheath assembly (nose taco shell, heater blanket, and abrasion strip) looks to be fully intact as well.

Once the skin+core afterbody departed, theres really not much left to come apart, other than the sheath-spar bondline, which is sized pretty stoutly.

Had they flown for much longer I am quite sure they would have lost the Sikorsky (patented) removable blade tip assembly as those fasteners are already a fatigue issue.
SansAnhedral is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2014, 15:00
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hobe Sound, Florida
Posts: 647
" BERP Plate "

Peter, you made me " burp " with that one! The S-67 swept tip first flew in 1970, long before the BERP blade flew. The UTTAS tip was pretty much a copy of that idea, and applied to the UTTAS design for generally the same considerations, and also in consideration of a bit higher tip speed as well.

Sans, cannot concur with the assumption that had they flown much longer the tip assembly would have departed. That assembly stands on its own structurally and has been flight tested to 3.53 G and a free stream mach number of 1.0. Auto Nr to 125%. The structure was initially designed to be field replaceable ( rather than run a spar all the way to the tip as in the UH-1 ) as it was accepted that the Army tactical environment would inevitably lead to tree strikes. ( Subject of an intense internal trade-off during UTTAS design phase in-house ). Never say never in aviation discussions, but the background indicates the tip cap wasn't going anywhere in the immediate future.

Last edited by JohnDixson; 12th Dec 2014 at 15:15. Reason: Added info, words.
JohnDixson is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2014, 15:11
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 60
Posts: 5,308
John, I am digging into memory and cannot remember if the aircraft remains controllable if the tip cap departs from one of the blades.
I am sure the balance is shot, and vibes would go up significantly. Would the blade go divergent in that case? (My brain thinks is would flap too much and hit something, but I don't recall why I think that.)
Has anyone had one leave in flight?
I should have some data points on this in my memory, but it's been enough years since I was operating that class of helicopter that it's been pushed out of long term memory by other less important details.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2014, 16:46
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hobe Sound, Florida
Posts: 647
Tip Cap

LW, I cannot recall a specific design requirement spec there, but one assumes that making the tip cap replaceable due to expected tree strikes indicates an aero assessment of the impact upon rotor stability was made to support the design feature. In any case the loss of that outer 10-12 ft of blade at 145 KIAS at Ft Campbell answers the question, as that impact on blade pitching moment had to exceed the tip cap contribution.

Now that I think of it, there was one time during the pre fly-off testing when we found a longish crack in one tip cap skin, like 10-12 inches. Engr evaluated it and ok'd it for flight. I asked about the impact of the failure progressing to failure, they said not to worry, but in the end decided to replace it prior to flight anyway.* Torsional stiffness of the UTTAS Ti spar blades was higher than the previous Al spar machines. ( not the only factor of course, but an important one, in getting to the free stream Mach 1.0 point with not a hint of a rotor stability issue ).

*In reading how this sounds, it seems to indicate a rather snap decision making process. Actually we had a few serious discussions before proceeding.

Last edited by JohnDixson; 12th Dec 2014 at 17:04. Reason: typos
JohnDixson is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2014, 18:28
  #25 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 598
With the missing afterbody, would you not expect in-plane chordwise oscillatory forces at the cap to increase dramatically?

With the TE wedge long gone, the skins are no longer contributing to a "torque box" at the attachment location for the cap.

I don't doubt in testing the cap would survive a plethora of overspeed and other conditions...but that is with, at worst, and intentionally placed flaw within the laminate on a fatigue test - not missing an entire afterbody!
SansAnhedral is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2014, 20:05
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hobe Sound, Florida
Posts: 647
Definition

Sorry, Sans. When you refer to afterbody, what are you referring to?
JohnDixson is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2014, 20:18
  #27 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 598
Basically everything aft of the aft spar wall.

Upper skin, lower skin, core, and trailing edge wedge insert.
SansAnhedral is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2014, 21:19
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hobe Sound, Florida
Posts: 647
Tip

I looked in vain for a drawing that shows how the tip cap is attached, but its pretty simple, thus easily replaced. Anyhow, in the two incidents to date, the tip cap has survived ( I think the Ft campbell tip cap had some tree dings ). The tip cap on the South Carolina Guard blade will get a thorough inspection, and that will answer your question. Be happy to post the findings. I am betting that the tip cap is good for much more than the max duration of fuel incl the outboard 230's if one has the ESSS.
JohnDixson is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2014, 06:22
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: global
Posts: 21
Tip cap attachment

Rotor Blade Balancing - Rotor & Wing Aviation Services - Rotor Track - Static and Dynamic Balance

John, See the attached link for a pictorial view of the tip cap attachment screw holes and underlying span tip weights. It can be seen that the tip cap could be conceivably lost in a tree strike and the tip weights not be affected….another great design feature…. obviously a lateral would develop in such an incident but certainly remain quite flyable.

cheers
RG
ring gear is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2014, 10:37
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: On the Rump of Pendle Hill Lancashi
Posts: 615
John,
My mistake, I thought the angled tip and the Berp were a universal sort of design with the Berp being a more modern piece of kit having seen it up close on the Speed record Lynx, but the question was answered in reading on through the next posts.
But still one hell of a strong helicopter to take that sort of breakdown/vibration and still recover from such height.

PB
Peter-RB is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2014, 14:23
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hobe Sound, Florida
Posts: 647
BERP

Peter, no apology necessary: I was just kidding anyway.

Ring Gear: thanks for the drawing link. The point you noted re the tip weight attachment being separate from the tip cap is important. The tip cap itself is extremely light. Might be kevlar now (?), but it started out as Al sheet and even that was really light. Point is that from a balance point of view, if the tip ( or tips, more likely ) get smashed on some tree limbs the resultant mass/aero imbalance won't be such as to create a more serious difficulty.
JohnDixson is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2014, 14:40
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 278
Different failure mode, I'm sure, but I can't help but think of this blade failure. You'll probably have to scroll down a bit to see the photo.
http://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/501...a-photo-2.html
Matari is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.