Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Sahara Sands v Volcanic Ash

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Sahara Sands v Volcanic Ash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Apr 2014, 06:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Far from home, but not far from here
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sahara Sands v Volcanic Ash

So my car is now covered in far more Sahara Sand than it was ever covered in volcanic ash when we were all banned from flying by the boffins. So why can it be safe to fly in this stuff but not the ash?

Cheers
Chippy
ChippyChop is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2014, 06:31
  #2 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 419 Likes on 221 Posts
The sand is more politically acceptable?
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2014, 07:22
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 898
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Simplistically; sand/dust results in abrasion (to the rotor blades as well as the compressor blades) but volcanic ash, with its much lower melting point, can result in glassification of the turbine blades as well. It is not the abrasion that results in engine failures (although it will affect their efficiency), it is melting ash in the hot end. That is how it can kill all engines within a short period of time.

Jim
JimL is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2014, 21:33
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yorkshire uk
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I am sure all the people who carried on flying during the last ash scare have all had engine problems ......NOT !!! Obviously you would not fly through a visible cloud of ash or sand .
nigelh is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2014, 07:43
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: England & Scotland
Age: 63
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or an invisible ash cloud, for that matter.

I kept on flying through the last 'crisis' because I (correctly, as it turned out) believed that on the evidence available there was no ash cloud along our planned route. Otherwise my machine would have remained in the hangar with the doors firmly shut.

Plenty of pictures available on the internet to show what ash does to a jet engine. Volcanic Ash Gives Jet Engine a Turbocharge : Discovery News
John R81 is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2014, 07:50
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sahara sands vs volcanic ash

Hi all

I think its a combination of many things when it comes to the sand/dust in the ME. The sand part of the sand/dust does have abrasion qualities mentioned, but the dust has similar qualities to ash with regards to effects on aviation turbine engines-in particular the blocking of pneumatic system filters, blocking of cooling holes or cavities in turbine sections and silica deposits on turbine blades.
But because there is sand and dust, the sand part abrades what is slowly deposited onto turbine blades....that and the fact that if it were measured in parts per million (ppm) the sand/dust compared with flying through an ash cloud you would find to be very different.

Just my 2 cents worth
Swinging Spanner is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2014, 09:01
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yorkshire uk
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just making the point that i know of many operators who worked ( cleaned up financially ) during the ash cloud fiasco , both jets , prop planes and helicopters and i dont know of one engine problem . Maybe there are ...if so let us know . Even some of the big passenger planes specifically flew through the clouds to get more info ....did they all replace engines ??
nigelh is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2014, 11:52
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: England & Scotland
Age: 63
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nigel

My machines did continue to work and no, there were no engine problems.

The point was that Class A air space closed on the basis of a mathematical model of location / density of ash. The actual location / density of ash did not match the model and hence no problems for those that did fly in the S. of England outside of actual ash contamination.

I have no idea whether anyone did fly a turbine helicopter through ash, but I don't fancy that one myself. abrasion of rotors would be significant, windscreen abrasion and all of the engine problems / risks (in a single)?
John R81 is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2014, 13:02
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yorkshire uk
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
John , My point really was that we ( Helicopter boys ) didnt need telling not to fly , especially VFR , as we could see if there was significant ash and keep away from it . In the countries with active volcanoes , they fly around them all the time and just use common sense !!!
Also if it is sand then flying through some for a short while shouldnt be a problem with a particle seperator ....
nigelh is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2014, 19:41
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: England
Age: 58
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Went to the Big Island, Hawaii, a few years ago and took a sight-seeing flight around the active volcano to the south. There were many aircraft, fixed wing and rotary, buzzing around the caldera.

They didn't seem too bothered!
Clever Richard is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.