Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

AW139 G-LBAL helicopter crash in Gillingham, Norfolk

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

AW139 G-LBAL helicopter crash in Gillingham, Norfolk

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Mar 2014, 05:29
  #161 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My deepest sympathies go those affected.

I remember reading once about a helicopter accident leaving a remote area with no published departure and the pilots anticipated entering IMC shortly after the climb out. After the VFR departure they coupled the auto pilot, set heading, speed, but sadly forgot to set a vertical speed. Already in IMC the crew failed to realize they didn't have a climb and impacted an obstacle not far from the take off site. Not drawing any conclusions as to what happened here with these excellent pilots and equipment but I was reminded of that tragic accident. I agree extra regulations isn't what we need. What I take away from this is we must remain vigilant because even those far greater in abilities/experience then ourself are also vulnerable to the risks of the operations.
HeliNomad is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 05:38
  #162 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Flying
Age: 45
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Greetings,

It is really sad and i'm sorry for the family of
those who died in the crash for thier loss.

The accident had happened for whatever reason.
The most important thing is to have RESPECT for
all the individuals and LEARN from the actual cause
to avoid such things in the future.

Accidents happen either in simple or complicated
aircraft, day, night, VFR, IFR or even on ground.

Rules were made and updated as experts see
them necessary. So, try to follow the rules as much
as you can

..

Fly safe
captain_m is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 07:00
  #163 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Monde
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Unconnected with the accident but curious nonetheless. Do crew and passengers travelling in a private helicopter across the Irish Sea have to wear immersion suits? I can't imagine corporate clients routinely going via Campbelltown so the shortest crossing of what is a very cold sea looks to be over 20 miles. Neither can I imagine ultra-wealthy passengers such as the ones on this aircraft or the one that crashed in the Mournes being over the moon about donning an immersion suit. Military crews would ordinarily wear a suit when there is any risk of ditching. Why not corporate? Or have I got it wrong and they'd all be suitably dressed for a lengthy over sea crossing?
Vie sans frontieres is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 07:43
  #164 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 415 Likes on 218 Posts
The rules for overwater flights in helicopters are broadly similar to those for fixed wing aircraft.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 08:30
  #165 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Monde
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But a helicopter arguably has a much greater chance of ending up in the drink.
Vie sans frontieres is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 08:47
  #166 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 72
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We are speculating about sh.. weather, technical or software problems of the helicopter.
Fact is, for all reasons: If it's not safe, say NO!!!
I did it several times, for weather and technical reasons and I'm still here after more than 40 years flying.
Workmates who could not say NO ended somewhere crashing into the hills.
Making this decisions can be very difficult and it's getting not easier the more experience you have.
I'm in the very lucky position to work for a company which accepts pilots decisions as final.
spencer17 is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 09:13
  #167 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: England
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Shy,

if I have offended you or anyone else on this forum with respect to this thread then I must apologise, it was not intentional, however if we are not going to speculate as to the possible causes of the accident and then the follow on information from that then this thread may as well be deleted leaving just the condolences thread.
We can say no more about it and wait the 12/18 months for the AAIB report.

Whilst I appreciate you knew the two pilots and therefore your emotions may be higher than those who didn't, speculation will always be evident.

R.I.P all those on board LBAL.

Out.
jeepys is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 09:14
  #168 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 415 Likes on 218 Posts
Spencer, I agree but as far as I'm concerned, any company I work for has to accept my word as final. Because if I say it's unsafe and they disagree I just walk away. I've done so a number of times and that's probably why I never got promoted to upper management, i.e. not being a perpetual yes man. But as we see here, no one respects you once you crash.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 09:18
  #169 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 415 Likes on 218 Posts
Jeeps, as I said before, I knew these two pilots only as fellow aviators. I'm not emotional about the accident, but I am principled in what I post on a public website after a fatal accident.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 09:57
  #170 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,120
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Over many years many references to Haughey Air have led down a path of concern over attitudes and treatment of it's pilots. Why is that?
Pittsextra is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 09:57
  #171 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what we know so far (won't use the word facts yet) The aircraft took off at night from a confined site/HP, the lone tallest tree within a few hundred metres of the site was chopped in half at a point just above the surrounding trees. The aircraft then contacted the ground in the field beyond and struck a substatial row of hay bales before coming to rest in the opposite direction. The crew knew this site well and recently.
We don't know if there was mechanical failure during or shortly after take-off, we know the weather visibility was poor in places in the area, but not what it was like at the site until witnesses/cctv at the house are questioned. Others have speculated that the owner was a man who liked to go when he said it was time to go, but that he felt concerned enough about the aircraft to take procedings against the manufacturer to get rid of it. If it's not mechanical failure, or crew error, it could just be that they were unlucky with the one tall tree in the darkness.
Art of flight is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 10:25
  #172 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tax-land.
Posts: 909
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
I don't think luck had anything to do with this accident.
tottigol is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 10:27
  #173 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would agree that all things considered there was no 'luck'.
Art of flight is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 11:20
  #174 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: France
Age: 71
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RIP to all the guys.

Having survived for more than 40 years of flying helis, I can only agree with the relatively few who say you need to say NO on occasions and make sure that the owners know that. I have worked for a company Shy has and was given the CP job after everyone else left. I had to start from scratch and the basic was explaining to the owner why everyone had left. Whilst he did not like it he eventually agreed and life, I think, improved for all. We used to fly in some awful weather but having written an ops manual which the boss accepted, we were able to achieve about 95% without incident. I left him in no doubt who had the last say! Corporate flying is good and rewarding as long it is safe. I worked on the principal there was only one person who had to survive and that was me, after which everyone else should be ok.
expatfrance is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 11:50
  #175 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Bedford, UK
Age: 64
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@HLCPTR

"Does anyone have the serial number of this aircraft?"

c/n 31421 (from airframes.org)

NS
NightSurfer is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 12:24
  #176 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shy, we do know the weather conditions. Read my post no. 156
Agaricus bisporus is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 14:36
  #177 (permalink)  

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 4,694
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
Nice one NightSurfer, however don't expect any thanks, I didn't get any after my similar answer yesterday
SilsoeSid is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 14:49
  #178 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: In Communicado
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aw, come on....


Not everyone has constant access.


But thank you both.
HLCPTR is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 15:24
  #179 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,284
Received 499 Likes on 208 Posts
Aga......I read your Post 156 again.

Would you share with us what you considered the weather conditions at the accident scene at the time of the accident to be....including amount of daylight, celestial illumination, etc. You were in close proximity of the scene at about the time of the accident and definitely have a background and experience level to provide for a qualified opinion.
SASless is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2014, 15:43
  #180 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wx at the accident scene - must be surmise on my part. I had driven 8 miles or so in the opposite direction at 2130 with no significant variation in the 30-40m vis so think it unlikely it would have been different a mile away at the Hall. The hall is on a slight rise I guess 50 ft above sea level max, my place is 30 ft. Wind calm. Light - none. very dark despite a full moon. When I was looking for the circling helos at 2100 - 2130 the moon was occasionally visible for an instant as a dim disk. The helos were not visible, nor were any lights on them.

True, this was a couple of hours after the accident so I can't be sure what things were like at 1930. As I drove to the pub at 1840 it was dusk with mist forming fast at ground level and vis I'd estimate at 2-3000m and reducing quickly. It would have been dark by 1930.
Agaricus bisporus is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.