Michael Schumacher HEMS Task
Thread Starter
Michael Schumacher HEMS Task
A big thumbs up to the HEMS crew involved in the retrieval of retired F1 driver Michael Schumacher from the ski fields a few days ago.
Reports in the media suggest that from the time of the incident, he had Paramedics on scene within 2 minutes, a HEMS crew on scene in 8 minutes and was in hospital 10 minutes later. (if anyone can clarify those times please do)
From my perspective as a Flight Paramedic and EMS pilot, that time-frame is an outstanding example of both the positive contribution of the helicopter to minimising delays from injury to definitive care, and also of the excellent standards of clinical judgement for the clinicians who resisted the temptation to faf about at the scene but got the guy to a critical care facility in the most expeditious manner. Some of the systems in Australia could learn from this example!
Well done that team.
Reports in the media suggest that from the time of the incident, he had Paramedics on scene within 2 minutes, a HEMS crew on scene in 8 minutes and was in hospital 10 minutes later. (if anyone can clarify those times please do)
From my perspective as a Flight Paramedic and EMS pilot, that time-frame is an outstanding example of both the positive contribution of the helicopter to minimising delays from injury to definitive care, and also of the excellent standards of clinical judgement for the clinicians who resisted the temptation to faf about at the scene but got the guy to a critical care facility in the most expeditious manner. Some of the systems in Australia could learn from this example!
Well done that team.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: N/A
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can't tell from the photo or the video, but are there any bear paws on the skids? Done a few picks off ski hills, and when it starts to tilt back in soft snow you'll wish for that 135 fenestron.
Reports in the media suggest that from the time of the incident, he had Paramedics on scene within 2 minutes, a HEMS crew on scene in 8 minutes and was in hospital 10 minutes later. (if anyone can clarify those times please do)
In the image below it is hard to be sure that the rotors are not running, the tips appear softer than the root.
For the paramedics to move across the snow make an assessment and presumably fit a neck brace then stretcher patient back to helicopter, depart scene and land at hospital all within 10 minutes is fast work.
Mickjoebill
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Al wrote
Well said. There can be a place for taking time, but the "scoop and run" is often a very good procedure. Amazing how time flies when dealing with a casualty, and everybody always feels what they are doing is vital to get done before moving the patient. Also a problem in the hospital casualty department (sorry, ER).
who resisted the temptation to faf about at the scene but got the guy to a critical care facility in the most expeditious manner
Surely the point we want to get across, assuming a common interest in promoting HEMS, is that other forms of transport would not have been possible and that the helicopter allowed the rapid provision of expert care.
I would be cautious about discussing or promoting scoop and run vs stabilise unless you were actually there and examined MS. Reports suggest a lucid period when transfer without intervention would have been ideal, but subsequent CT scans were reported as significant intracranial haematomata and in that situation elective anaesthesia on scene would have been indicated.
Sorry to go medical on a rotorheads thread, but scoop and run with an unconscious head injury is one of the few HEMS manoeuvres shown to be medically disadvantageous. We don't want an own goal
I would be cautious about discussing or promoting scoop and run vs stabilise unless you were actually there and examined MS. Reports suggest a lucid period when transfer without intervention would have been ideal, but subsequent CT scans were reported as significant intracranial haematomata and in that situation elective anaesthesia on scene would have been indicated.
Sorry to go medical on a rotorheads thread, but scoop and run with an unconscious head injury is one of the few HEMS manoeuvres shown to be medically disadvantageous. We don't want an own goal
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK and MALTA
Age: 61
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
4 Posts
Rad girl - I agree with your post BUT you need someone on scene who can administer and manage an anaesthetised patient. If you do not have this your best option is clear WX and a helicopter to the nearest site that has.
DB
DB
Rad girl - I agree with your post BUT you need someone on scene who can administer and manage an anaesthetised patient. If you do not have this your best option is clear WX and a helicopter to the nearest site that has.
skadi
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK and MALTA
Age: 61
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
4 Posts
Skadi intubation is a procedure that paramedics are normally authorised to perform. An anaesthetist is usually required to stabilised a serious head injury.
DB
DB
Thread Starter
Was not actually promoting HEMS or anything else, but was acknowledging the excellent work done by this crew on this case - and by crew I include the 1st responders, the 1st paramedics, the HEMS team, the assisting bystanders, the receiving facility and all the ongoing specialist care.
I am not aware of any credible studies done anywhere in the world that show an improved outcome from unnecessary interventions on scene. The whole point of the exercise is to minimise the time between the injury and the definitive care, which for this patient was a neurosurgeon and a suitable hospital. Which is what happened. Ergo, again, well done that team.
Let's not tangent off into a esoteric discussion on the relative merits of what one system promotes by way of stabilisation against another system - or if that's of interest, take it to the Medical Forum. 'K?
I am not aware of any credible studies done anywhere in the world that show an improved outcome from unnecessary interventions on scene. The whole point of the exercise is to minimise the time between the injury and the definitive care, which for this patient was a neurosurgeon and a suitable hospital. Which is what happened. Ergo, again, well done that team.
Let's not tangent off into a esoteric discussion on the relative merits of what one system promotes by way of stabilisation against another system - or if that's of interest, take it to the Medical Forum. 'K?
I'm an anaesthetist with neurosurgical anaesthetic experience. However I would like to ask our Alpine flyers 'is it sensible to fly a predominently white helicopter in Alpine areas?'.
Safe flying
G-BHIB C182
Safe flying
G-BHIB C182
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Age: 61
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
intubation is a procedure that paramedics are normally authorised to perform.
Why couldn't intubation be performed while airborne?
Getting a bit medical but
Intubation in flight is quite feasible if the aircraft is designed with the doctor at the head of the patient. However, the definitive treatment would not have been a neurosurgeon but an anaesthetist and anaesthesia. So if you are at 1000 feet over open ground it makes sense to land and intubate, if only so as to be able to lay out drugs and equipment with the certainty that they are not going to shoot off around the cabin. Once this is achieved you have bought significant time for imaging and if necessary the neurosurgeon!
Intubation in flight is quite feasible if the aircraft is designed with the doctor at the head of the patient. However, the definitive treatment would not have been a neurosurgeon but an anaesthetist and anaesthesia. So if you are at 1000 feet over open ground it makes sense to land and intubate, if only so as to be able to lay out drugs and equipment with the certainty that they are not going to shoot off around the cabin. Once this is achieved you have bought significant time for imaging and if necessary the neurosurgeon!
Getting a bit medical but
Intubation in flight is quite feasible if the aircraft is designed with the doctor at the head of the patient. However, the definitive treatment would not have been a neurosurgeon but an anaesthetist and anaesthesia. So if you are at 1000 feet over open ground it makes sense to land and intubate, if only so as to be able to lay out drugs and equipment with the certainty that they are not going to shoot off around the cabin. Once this is achieved you have bought significant time for imaging and if necessary the neurosurgeon!
It is gratifying to see a HEMS mission where it appears a life was truly saved. Lets hope the final outcome is not as bad as we fear.
Intubation in flight is quite feasible if the aircraft is designed with the doctor at the head of the patient. However, the definitive treatment would not have been a neurosurgeon but an anaesthetist and anaesthesia. So if you are at 1000 feet over open ground it makes sense to land and intubate, if only so as to be able to lay out drugs and equipment with the certainty that they are not going to shoot off around the cabin. Once this is achieved you have bought significant time for imaging and if necessary the neurosurgeon!
It is gratifying to see a HEMS mission where it appears a life was truly saved. Lets hope the final outcome is not as bad as we fear.