Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Police helicopter crashes onto Glasgow pub

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Police helicopter crashes onto Glasgow pub

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Mar 2014, 09:32
  #2721 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd say, given the circumstances of flying a (very) light single, at night, with limited flying experience, over a very congested area, the pilots were lucky to walk away from that. I also think an organisation who thinks a couple of hundred hours flying experience and an aircraft like that a suitable formula for night police ops is a little misguided. Please tell me things are different 10 years on.

Perhaps the one bonus of all his 497 hours total flying on the one simple type, meant he was ready for such a situation. I remember nights above Belfast always twitching at every unusual vibe or sound.
Art of flight is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 10:56
  #2722 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Nova
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SS

I would agree with what I 'think' is your implication. That the pilot-rated observer did a damned good job. Quite possibly saving both of their lives. I guess it reinforces the idea that, sometimes single pilots of all experience levels are a little more easily overwhelmed than two qualified pilots flying together?

No argument from me there.

Was this pilot-rated observer, a qualified pilot on this type, and operation, but simply working as an observer on this particular flight?
Tandemrotor is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 11:56
  #2723 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it had 2 engines it wouldn't have needed a discussion of how many pilots......so swings and roundabouts, and all very dependent on which bit breaks and who makes what decision at the time. A couple of fatals very recently with 2 pilots and 2 engines and no apparent faults, North Sea and German Police. Could we keep the 2 pilot/2 engines on other threads, along with how to enter auto's.
Art of flight is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 12:22
  #2724 (permalink)  

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 4,694
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
Tr, no.
What I am saying is that in my opinion, the pilot was too involved with getting the call out that he had to be reminded to get into autorotation and at the bottom had to be reminded to flare! Also reading the report, he had to told to watch the torque!

Last edited by SilsoeSid; 15th Mar 2014 at 10:07. Reason: No edit, but just to point out that this post is in reference to the San Antonio video!
SilsoeSid is online now  
Old 15th Mar 2014, 03:03
  #2725 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Auckland
Age: 81
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Human factors

Sit in the cockpit and say to yourself: It's all going to turn to custard sometime for sure, is this a good day (night), or have I felt a sharper?

Some days I am relieved the skies are clear and I'm on familiar routes, with fields below. Other times I enjoy the challenge of poor weather and difficult terrain.

Because I am not a professional pilot, I remind myself: This is supposed to be fun, I don't have to go; I can please myself entirely.

I am not suggesting pilots fly when they don't feel up to it, but I wonder if put to the test of a hundred real life-threatening emergencies, how many good pilots would get it right every time.

One thing for sure, you won't kill yourself pontificating on PPRuNe.
Ornis is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2014, 03:59
  #2726 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ventura Ca U.S.A.
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Compressor stalls will wreck the engine instraments, Your ears fill with the noise of cannon fire & all the guage neddles start flappin like humming bird wings.
hillberg is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2014, 09:30
  #2727 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: N/A
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DAPT
...... in Glasgow accident one engine quit first so collective was higher when the second engine quit it caused rotor to reach unrecoverable state more rapidly......
fact / theory check
AnFI is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2014, 11:49
  #2728 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the big blue planet
Posts: 1,027
Received 24 Likes on 12 Posts
@DAPT
In OEI the collective should be lower than in normal AEO conditions.

skadi
skadi is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2014, 11:51
  #2729 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,287
Received 503 Likes on 210 Posts
Facts generally elude DAPT.
SASless is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2014, 12:24
  #2730 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Liverpool based Geordie, so calm down, calm down kidda!!
Age: 60
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Over simplified, the collective sets a pitch angle on the MR Blades. Two engines can provide more power than one engine, allowing higher pitch settings.
Do not confuse collective with a throttle, where you have to rev the tits off an engine to provide enough power.
Please don't rip that apart, it is a simplified explanation. Max continuous OEI on this 135 is 86%, max continuous is 2 x 69%.
jayteeto is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2014, 12:38
  #2731 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 419 Likes on 221 Posts
It has been said before in Glasgow accident one engine quit first so collective was higher when the second engine quit it caused rotor to reach unrecoverable state more rapidly.
DAPT, you're obviously no helicopter pilot. Who told you that load of old hogwash?
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2014, 12:55
  #2732 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Liverpool based Geordie, so calm down, calm down kidda!!
Age: 60
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Not the 135, this makes your statement of fact somewhat wrong.
jayteeto is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2014, 15:00
  #2733 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK and MALTA
Age: 61
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 4 Posts
DAPT - you might really say a collective pitch setting that equates to the recommended RRPM OEI for the Ambient temperature and pressure.

Someone else have a go!
DOUBLE BOGEY is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2014, 15:49
  #2734 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 419 Likes on 221 Posts
Poorly worded I should have said Maximum Pitch for that condition of flight OEI
Which would require a lower collective pitch setting than for AEO flight, not higher. Unless you think that one engine can give more total torque output than two!

Sorry, your original statement is totally erroneous.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2014, 20:36
  #2735 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yorkshire uk
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SASless - Get a life you old codger. Climb down from your own backside and stop bullying anyone who disagrees with you - prat.

Am I the only one who nearly fell off their chair reading this .... From TC !!!!!!!

Priceless . No , I mean REALLY priceless !!!!!
nigelh is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2014, 21:17
  #2736 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: S England
Posts: 157
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
No Nigel, you are not alone! I don't think he is able to write a post without bullying or name calling, poor lad.

Last edited by 76fan; 15th Mar 2014 at 22:48. Reason: Added reference to refer to his lack of years and experience
76fan is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2014, 23:50
  #2737 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: N/A
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and another good result from OEI in a single over a city:

EXCLUSIVE: Chopper pilot, passenger talk about downtown landing | More Local News - KITV Home


OEI in singles is rare and not that bad, generally.


SS : "he had to be reminded to get into autorotation and at the bottom had to be reminded to flare!" He was reminded doesn't mean he HAD to be reminded.

and : "as they hammer into the ground and skid across the parking lot in a shower of sparks!" actually a good result; hammered gently (survivably), "parking lot" good, etc


good result esp for 400hrs, put a 'super hero' on board and it should have been perfect, no? (wires are difficult to see at night in auto, but again did not result in catastrophie)
AnFI is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2014, 00:20
  #2738 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,287
Received 503 Likes on 210 Posts
TR,

A question came to mind after reading your posts and those of Anfi's.

I have far more twin time than single....have done the Police thing in both single and twins (if you accept Nuclear Security to be much the same as Police work)....and have had engine failures in both kinds of helicopter.

Very few Police Forces in the USA operate Twins......most rely upon Singles.

Our Police forces also generally promote Police Officers from the Squad Car to the Helicopter job....thus they have experienced Police Officers but in-experienced Pilots. Perhaps that is why the Single Engine helicopter is so common...along with the cost issue.

So...to the question.....Why do you suggest.... "Twins are the very, very least the Public deserve?".

Singles are pretty reliable these days.....and as we have seen....Twins land on top of the "Public" too.

Is there some empirical data somewhere that supports the benefit of the Twin over the Single in Police work?

Understand....I would fly a four engined helicopter if one was made as I like the idea of lots of engines so I am not trying to argue against your view.....just wondering if you are aware of any reliable studies that show the accident rates for Singles are worse than for Twins in Police work?

I will search the ALEA web site to see if they have anything.

The UK Law requires Twins....but the American FAA does not.

That will play a role in what types of aircraft are represented in the studies.
SASless is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2014, 00:29
  #2739 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Nova
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SAS

I too. Have flown police ops in both singles and twins. the single type was SA341G Gazelle. (Though of course I also have the ubiquitous B206 Jetdanger on my licence too.) The twins were BO105 and AS355. I have also flown precisely the same job in both piston and turbine twin engined fixed wing. Though I believe the Optica, in the right hands, would also have been a superb platform.

I too will be absolutely intrigued to see any comparison of accident statistics between FAA regulated police ops, and UK police ops.

Over to you.
Tandemrotor is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2014, 11:15
  #2740 (permalink)  

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 4,694
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
Not knowing the 'culture' up in Glasgow; When faced with the low fuel warnings, then looking at the CAD seeing the fuel in the main tank and not in the supply tanks, while looking for a landing site 'dealing with the situation, could the pilot have asked the front observer to switch on the transfer pumps?

Just another thought
SilsoeSid is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.