Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Review into North Sea offshore helicopter operations announced by CAA

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Review into North Sea offshore helicopter operations announced by CAA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Aug 2014, 12:48
  #181 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Holly Beach, Louisiana
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Despite being a very experienced Diver but not current at the time of the training in the pool....it was not exactly a piece of cake. No big deal just dropping down and breathing while up right but upside down with legs hung over the side of the pool edge was a bit of a trick to cope with.

Now as to trying that without being an experienced Diver, for real in cold water, following a hard impact....well at least your odds are improved but how much really?

In Pool training is a must!
Boudreaux Bob is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2014, 16:49
  #182 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Boudreaux Bob
In Pool training is a must!
I doubt that anyone would disagree. However, we've become so risk-averse that the in-pool training environment has become rather benign.
diginagain is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2014, 19:47
  #183 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Netherlands
Age: 54
Posts: 3,185
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Pool training

Nobody is allowed offshore without proper pool training.
At least in the Netherlands. We have done away with 72 hour excemptions.
The dry trainer CA-EBS is an add-on onto the rebreather training covered in Bosiet training.

SLB
Self loading bear is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2014, 08:12
  #184 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Aberdeen
Age: 75
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But the EBS "training" is not very realistic, all it really shows you is how to put the thing on, and deploy it.

I did my last survival refresher in September 2013, therefore it will be Sep 2017 before I get a chance to try the EBS in an underwater environment (although I don't intend to still be offshore by that time!). That is a long time, and there are many of my offshore colleagues in a similar situation.
coatimundi is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2014, 16:20
  #185 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Memo out today advising that a number of jackets have been returned post-flight with depleted bottles. Contents will be checked at offshore departure-point and if there are empty cylinders and no spares employees will be delayed offshore until they can be provided with a full cylinder.
diginagain is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2014, 09:23
  #186 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Folks, may I ask how is the new EBS system working out. Apparently the 'mouth piece and nose clip' needs a bit of a re-design. I was speaking to someone who did the training and he said that the oval mouth piece is hard to grip and the nose clip gave him a piercing pain if he moved his head.

I just saw this on the internet https://falckebs.wordpress.com/ and the mouth piece looks a much better design. I thought that there was only one unit type available, but maybe I was wrong.
Langball is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2014, 05:45
  #187 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Used to be God's own County
Posts: 1,719
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Lines have to be purged before going into the boot so bottles will deplete - also, purging makes a great noise so helps to pass the time.......
Different degree of servicing and those whom have it in SNS seem happy enough. I suggest any niggles with nose clip being designed to suit maximum shapes will soon be forgotten when under water!
Atleast they have EBS - unlike the crew who will still suffer from 'cold shock' regardless of how big their escape door is ;-)
EESDL is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2014, 08:29
  #188 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Applicability of UK CAA Safety Directive

The latest safety directive from the UK CAA is published here: http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/SafetyDirective2014002.pdf

According to the SD it is applicable to "All AOC Helicopter Operators Conducting Offshore Operations".
Does any of you know how the UK CAA plan to enforce this applicability after EASA HOFO regulation is implemented next year? According to CRD 2013-10, the new rule will replace all national regulation, and from my understanding it will also invalid this SD.

After the new regulation is implemented, operators from all EU states will be welcome to engage in UK offshore heli ops, and these will be under the oversight from the authority in their respective home states. I do not see how UK CAA can add any additional requirements like this in the future.
Pi1ot is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2016, 15:53
  #189 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Croydon
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
however one should also keep in mind a sense of priority
There were nearly 120 fatalities in the UK sector in 40 years. In justifying their directives on EBS and window size the CAA seem to have implied around 30% were people trapped in capsized helicopters.

The real percentage turns out to have been just 9%, 11 people, with just 4 in the last 20 years.

CAP1145 Helicopter Water Impact Survivability Statistics - A Critique

The difference? The CAA included pax incapacitated on impact who were unable to escape and 20 tourists on the way to the Sillies.

Good to see the operators doing some operationally directed research: Helicopter industry collaborates on eyetracking research to enhance flight safety
squib66 is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2016, 16:18
  #190 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,957
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by squib66
Good to see the operators doing some operationally directed research: Helicopter industry collaborates on eyetracking research to enhance flight safety
Is this link that you meant? Helicopter industry collaborates on eye-tracking research to enhance flight safety | Vertical Magazine - The Pulse of the Helicopter Industry
Bravo73 is online now  
Old 26th Jan 2016, 20:43
  #191 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Croydon
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bravo73
Is this link that you meant?
Yes. Thanks.
squib66 is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2016, 10:24
  #192 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,245
Received 330 Likes on 183 Posts
There were nearly 120 fatalities in the UK sector in 40 years. In justifying their directives on EBS and window size the CAA seem to have implied around 30% were people trapped in capsized helicopters.

The real percentage turns out to have been just 9%, 11 people, with just 4 in the last 20 years.

CAP1145 Helicopter Water Impact Survivability Statistics - A Critique

The difference? The CAA included pax incapacitated on impact who were unable to escape and 20 tourists on the way to the Sillies.
Quite. My personal view is that (sadly) the CAA may rue the day they enforced these devices
212man is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2016, 22:22
  #193 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A derivative of the widely used military STASS system called HEUBA was introduced on the Canadian East Coast were it is being / has been used by passengers from Conoco-Phillips, Hibernian (an ExxonMobil JV), Husky, Suncor, Shell and Statoil for over 5 years.
zalt is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2016, 00:46
  #194 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Nova Scotia
Age: 66
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Correct, Zalt. This was in response to the Cougar accident and in my opinion, a good one. More expensive training, but vastly superior to those horrific re-breathers used elsewhere. I've used EBS in the military and commercially since 1989 and feel quite uncomfortable over cold water (or warm, for that matter) without it. The pax seem to appreciate it as well.
CG4A is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2016, 19:14
  #195 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Croydon
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My personal view is that (sadly) the CAA may rue the day they enforced these devices
Why? If Canada and the Military are using them would it not reflect badly on CAA (and the oil companies) 'next time'.
squib66 is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2016, 12:38
  #196 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,245
Received 330 Likes on 183 Posts
Why? If Canada and the Military are using them.....
Firstly, they are not 'using' them, they are 'wearing' them, which is an entirely different thing. Secondly, the training is superior and not classroom based.

The idea that somebody who is not a sports diver, will take a mouthpiece and purge it and then start breathing underwater for the first time, ever, in a real emergency, seems very far fetched. I say that as someone that has never used SCUBA gear and has done HEED/STASS training.
212man is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2016, 13:37
  #197 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,317
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Having consulted with a world-leading expert on water survival at a SAR symposium a few years ago - the mouthpiece needs to be in place before you enter the water since the human 'gasp-reflex' will likely render you unable to purge the mouthpiece if you wait until after water entry and the colder the water, the worse it gets.

Purging upside down is an art and needs to be practised in a pool not a classroom.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2016, 16:53
  #198 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Croydon
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was under the impression in Canada a SWET chair is used to practice HEUBA deployment underwater at a 'safe', shallow depth but in the UK the oil industry training body has removed all EBS HUET runs from their CA-EBS standard harving the total HUET runs too. Considering the AAIB have already queried the training for the earlier rebreathers in an interim Sumburgh report one can only hope they opine on EBS training in their final report.
squib66 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.