Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

R-22 ROTOR SEPARATION? Florida Photo

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

R-22 ROTOR SEPARATION? Florida Photo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Feb 2013, 17:11
  #141 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 88
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I understand the concept behind measuring bolt stretch to determine preload (and why it's better than using torque in some applications), but I've also never seen it called for on the particular helicopter & airplane types I've maintained in the past.

So, no, I wouldn't consider it to be unusual for an A&P to never have done it - I fall into that category myself.
brett s is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2013, 17:15
  #142 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've never heard of "stretching" a bolt
Measuring bolt stretch is actually the most precise way of pre loading a bolt. Of course the method has its limitations in that you need access to both sides of the bolt to be able to measure with the tool/gauge (micrometer). Robinson apparently teach the procedure in their factory maintenance school.

Maintenance Training The Robinson Way - AviationPros.com
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2013, 12:51
  #143 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: lancs.UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Stretch- bolts" have been common in the UK motor-trade for~20 years!

When the first engines appeared with them, we assumed it was a racket to sell more parts

Up until their introduction, it had been normal to torque in stages and sometimes time-lapses between stages.....sometimes run to working -temp amd retorque hot, others cool and retorque .still others nail them down and send 'em out.
then came stretch bolts.... low initial torque , then mark all heads with a paint-stripe, then wind each one so many degrees in diffferent stages.....you'd feel them "twang!"..It needed a bit of research , (easy, nowadays with the internet.) A much more accurate way to tighten, as it virtually eliminates the problems caused by burred/damaged/dirty threads.
cockney steve is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2013, 14:01
  #144 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: DFW, TX
Age: 47
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is some intersting stuff. I'd doubt I'll see it on any of Sikorsky's stuff anytime soon since most all of our flight critical hardware is inaccessible and uses externally installed bolts threaded into inserts or barrel nuts, but I manage GSE across the H-60/ S-70i fleet so I always have my eyes open for new stuff.
bhawkh60 is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2013, 14:02
  #145 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In a Hangar
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What you're describing Steve is very different. On the head of a Robinson you can get to both ends of the bolt and measure the bolt before it is tightened and afterwards. The correct tool just fits over the bolt and allows you to use a dial gauge DTi to measure the increase in thousands of an inch.
Chopper Doc is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2013, 04:12
  #146 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bhawkh60 wrote:

You've got to be kidding me. You can read Sikorsky tech pubs or FAA hardware study guides all day long and will never find reference one to "stretching" a bolt. It's all TQ values.

As far as "Yikes, I sure hope you are not licenced to actually sign off on anything ":

What part of A&P confused you?
__________________________________________

Two points:

(1) But that's all TQ IS! You are simply stretching a bolt to a prescribed a value! And on really critical applications it is taken one step further to include special grease and a rotational limit in which you must get the prescribed TQ.

(2) Re your A&P - my point exactly. Where did you get it - out of a popcorn box?

Last edited by oleary; 22nd Feb 2013 at 04:14.
oleary is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2013, 10:24
  #147 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In the air with luck
Posts: 1,018
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Here is a cheap one, cockney s more like 40 years Peaugot among the first

Last edited by 500e; 22nd Feb 2013 at 10:25.
500e is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2013, 11:00
  #148 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oleary,

You've hijacked the thread. bhawkh60 simply said that on the aircraft he has worked on, he has not applied the specific procedure of measuring bolt stretch as a function of measuring proper torque. Nor had I, after years as an AMT.

Had he been assigned to work on a Robinson, he would have seen the written procedure, and followed it in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. That's what a good A&P does. Get off the tiny soapbox, please.
Matari is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2013, 19:05
  #149 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just as an aside,,,,,There was no torque figure for any pre-war Rolls Royce engines. RR mechanics were trained to "know" how tight and "feel the bolts down".... proper engineers, how times have changed...

Don't worry I'le get me coat......... !

E.
Efirmovich is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2013, 19:06
  #150 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As said earlier, bolt stretch is a simple concept, easily understood and applied.

However, these are not tractors. These are aircraft. If the procedure is not called for in the OEM maintenance manual, then you do not perform the procedure. If it is, then the AMT performs the procedure. In many cases, an AMT can work on a variety of aircraft in his/her career where bolt stretch is not an approved procedure according to the OEM. That is the point you seem to be missing.

'Nuf said.

edited for Efirmovich: Don't forget the old German torque applied to the Bolkows..."Gutentite"

Last edited by Matari; 22nd Feb 2013 at 19:07.
Matari is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2013, 08:10
  #151 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was no torque figure for any pre-war Rolls Royce engines
Recall a story written by a chap who as a youth on an apprenticeship was given the task of tightening bolts in the construction of spars for Spitfire wings. Kept snapping the bolts. In those days the length of the spanner was stipulated, and in that way the average man wouldn't over TQ.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2013, 04:37
  #152 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Melbourne,Vic,Australia
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Seen it done that way with vibrofeeders - 3,000 ftlb so fitters on the scales and some calculations.
Deaf is online now  
Old 26th Feb 2013, 07:16
  #153 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Manitoba Canada
Age: 72
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Overtorquing bolts also distorts and stretches the threads ..... whether in automotive , industrial , or aviation.

Do a little test on your next coffee break in the shop ..... and do it in front of all the musclemen who figure tight as hell is good enough.

Use common grade hardware store bolt , 3/8" by 2" long. ...... place a nice stack of washers on the bolt until there are only enough threads showing for the nut to be installed ...... use two wrenches and tighten normally ..... then as hard as you can .... tighten it a lot more.

Spin the nut off , remove the washers , and try to spin the nut all the way down the threaded area .... you will only get partway because the threads have been stretched and the nut will bind. You should even be able to visually see where the threaded area has stretched.

Next time you are having trouble changing the tire on your car because the wheel nuts are hard to turn ..... some muscleman at some gas station has stretched the wheel studs with a 250# impact wrench.
Arnie Madsen is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2013, 08:10
  #154 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South East Asia
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I remember correctly - and I often don't - the installation of the power turbine rotor in the LTS101 engine requires a combination of torque on the retainining nut (applied with a torque wrench) and stretch of the shaft (measured with a DTI). Both must be within prescribed limits to achieve an acceptable installation.
Saint Jack is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2013, 09:19
  #155 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I remember correctly - and I often don't
And, the Jesus nut on the '47 with a 24" shifter, was two and a half white knuckles and a reasonable resonance. Yarpis might refer to that as a - ffwawt
topendtorque is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2013, 23:08
  #156 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: LA Ca. USA
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I also work hardens the bolt.
Robinson helicopter rotor head hardware is stretched, not torqued.
Not only that, the nut head is drilled and cotter pinned after the proper stretch is achieved. Since the bolt work hardens it can only be stretched 2 or 3 times before the drilled holes will no longer match up on the nut.
Then you have to use new hardware.
Bolt stretching is nothing new, the main crank assembly on radial engines required stretch back in the day.

Last edited by 68fish; 18th Mar 2013 at 05:04.
68fish is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2013, 10:57
  #157 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has the second blade been recovered yet

cheers tet
topendtorque is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2013, 12:54
  #158 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Soon......

Not yet, water is still cold and I have been busy with other issues....but soon as it warms up a bit more I will go get it.
susieqfish is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2013, 10:36
  #159 (permalink)  
fdr
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 3rd Rock, #29B
Posts: 2,956
Received 861 Likes on 257 Posts
Coning Bolts

If a coning bolt has failed to maintain tension due to fatigue/embrittlement/over-torquing, or for any other reason, then the immediate outcome is that the disk is not teetering about the teeter hinge, it becomes some point offset in the direction of the coning bolt that has lost tension. That is annoying in the hover.. in forward flight it would impose some pretty dramatic loads.
fdr is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2013, 11:00
  #160 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
in forward flight it would impose some pretty dramatic loads.
fdr.
To explore; perhaps a major vibration with nodular points along the blades until it whips badly enough to cause the opposite blade to fail and begin tearing - the one with the good bolt - that causes a sudden rotational shock load - which causes its coning bolt and the first failing coning bolt to fail simultaneously?

The damaged blade stays in one piece because at the time of failure it still had not lost the torn piece and immediately had a different flight vector towards the blade tip thus allowing the torn bit which was attached at outer end - to stay still attached.
tet.
topendtorque is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.