Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

AS350 - Ground Resonance [video]

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

AS350 - Ground Resonance [video]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Feb 2012, 22:47
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Shelton WA.
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Paco can you show me a main rotor drive with a Hooke's Joint or explain your example a little more?
Thanks GT.
Gemini Twin is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2012, 22:58
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is one story circulating in the aviation media that the 350 in question experienced "excessive vibration" in flight prior to landing.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2012, 05:21
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 72
Posts: 4,144
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 14 Posts
The Hooke's joint effect I mentioned above is more in context for forward flight, when the disc is not level, but in the hover an imbalanced rotor mast can come from a sticky damper. However, for those who are interested, here is HJ effect as I understand it:

In the hover, the C of G of a blade will be the same radius from the axis of rotation all the way round the disc. When you move the cyclic to change the disc attitude, the changed radius will make the blade lead or lag about the dragging hinge as it flaps up or down.

In forward flight, the advancing blade speeds up and moves forward on its drag hinge or bearing as it flaps up (if there isn’t a hinge, the blade will just bend). Similarly, the retreating blade moves back slightly as it starts to slow and flap down. Thus, lead and lag arise from the aerodynamic effects that cause flapping.

Image 1

The end result is that both blades (and their Centres of Gravity) lie forward of a line drawn laterally across the rotor hub as they try to reposition themselves, as well as moving towards the retreating side.

So, whenever the driving and driven axes (the shaft axis and axis of rotation) are not in line with each other, the C of G of the whole rotor system is placed forward of the mast in the direction of flight, which will give the mast a tendency to bend - one reason why the Bell 206 has a speed limit above a certain torque setting (mast bending stresses). This imbalance creates Hooke’s Joint Effect, which looks like this from the side:

Image 2

A Hooke's joint (later called a universal joint by Henry Ford) allows a drive shaft to bend whilst it is rotating - in other words, it can allow power transmission to go round corners, within certain limits, by using two rotating joints at 90° to each other. Thus, it can compensate for misalignments and relative movement between the shafts they connect. It would appear that the Hooke's Joint Effect refers to the Bell 47 which had two hinges at 90° to each other in the rotor hub, gimbal fashion, which is strange, because it ought to relate more properly to articulated heads. In other teetering heads, such as the Bell 206, the ring was not used so there was only one hinge (the teetering one) but the expression was retained.

Phil

Last edited by Senior Pilot; 28th Feb 2012 at 09:58. Reason: Images too large for Rotorheads
paco is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2012, 16:04
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Shelton WA.
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Very intersting P but not quite relevent to this incident. Post above your last mentioned vibrations during the flight, I would not be surprised if it had a starflex failure leading to the shackup upon landing. This wouldn't be the first time for a AS350 to seriously damaged after landing with a broken star flex.
Gemini Twin is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2012, 16:24
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 72
Posts: 4,144
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 14 Posts
Somebody asked the question, so I answered!

I hear you about the starflex though.

Phil
paco is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2012, 17:52
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Shelton WA.
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No problem paco, I really enjoyed your explaination. Never to old to learn.
I remember a BA landed on a rig deck with a broken starflex causing a massive inbalance condition during rundown. Not quite the classic ground resonance, which can occur with a serviceable helicopter given the right conditions, but the effect was almost the same. Amonst other things, broken tail boom (not due to M/R strike) and lucky it didn't dance over the side.
Gemini Twin is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2013, 19:11
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Aberdare, Wales
Age: 31
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HeliStudent is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2019, 06:30
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: australia
Age: 60
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ReverseFlight
Speaking from personal experience. I once landed AS350 carefully on the flat strip at the rear of the starboard skids, then applied a little too much downward pressure on the collective and ground resonance kicked in immediately - it happens too easily. I lifted off at once and repeated the landing, this time with micro-millimeters of pressure easing on the collective for an uneventful setdown. Never to be repeated again.
phew, close call. Gotta be careful on those strips on the right hand skids.
rottenjohn is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.