Any Helicopter Articles on Over-Reliance on GPS
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any Helicopter Articles on Over-Reliance on GPS
Hey guys, I am looking for some articles on Over-Reliance on GPS in the helicopter world. I am doing some research on for a paper and this seemed like a pretty good topic. I know I have been told more then once by the older guys that use young guys are over reliant on GPS for navigation and that we can't read a sectional properly. My response is always "what's a sectional?"
Thanks in advance
Thanks in advance
As one gets older....one has to rely on the GPS as one cannot see the map much less read the thing!
If offshore....can one rely upon the GPS too much?
If you have exactly one....or even two GPS's...how do you know they are telling you the truth?
Perhaps you might just look for good articles on the "proper" use of GPS and draw your inferences from those by comparing known common practices to what would be "Industry Best Practices"....thus writing your very own article on the subject.
If offshore....can one rely upon the GPS too much?
If you have exactly one....or even two GPS's...how do you know they are telling you the truth?
Perhaps you might just look for good articles on the "proper" use of GPS and draw your inferences from those by comparing known common practices to what would be "Industry Best Practices"....thus writing your very own article on the subject.
I know of one occasion in Asia where a Supa Puma, flying to a rig some 140 miles out found there was nothing there when the GPS said there should be.
The GPS had junped somewhere and they had to turn back to land. Not enough fuel so they had to ditch, successfully, without any injuries by a couple of fishing boats. The aircarft conveniently sank in deepish water so they could not investigate it.
If they had checked that their NDB was pointing in the right direction on departure they would not have gone the wrong way.
The GPS had junped somewhere and they had to turn back to land. Not enough fuel so they had to ditch, successfully, without any injuries by a couple of fishing boats. The aircarft conveniently sank in deepish water so they could not investigate it.
If they had checked that their NDB was pointing in the right direction on departure they would not have gone the wrong way.
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 422 Likes
on
222 Posts
One of my pet peeves as a Puma QHI when TANS came into use was the pilots who tried to plan a diversion using the black box, rather than getting out a chart. The old HC1 was always short of fuel (sometimes even before takeoff). Quite often it's not possible to go in a straight line and features such as Salisbury Plain Danger area get in the way, requiring a lengthy diversion and far more precise fuel planning. Using a chart makes that issue immediately obvious, one glimpse is worth more than any number of key strokes.
One RAF Puma later ran completely out of fuel in Portugal and was damaged during the subsequent engine off landing. Not sure how much the pilot relied on GPS/TANS but his in-flight fuel planning was rubbish (and so was his crew co-operation as his crewman/navigator got to the point of threatening to hit him with the fire axe if he didn't land before the engines stopped).
But I can also think of a fatal accident where, if the pilot had made better use of the GPS, all on board might have survived.
One RAF Puma later ran completely out of fuel in Portugal and was damaged during the subsequent engine off landing. Not sure how much the pilot relied on GPS/TANS but his in-flight fuel planning was rubbish (and so was his crew co-operation as his crewman/navigator got to the point of threatening to hit him with the fire axe if he didn't land before the engines stopped).
But I can also think of a fatal accident where, if the pilot had made better use of the GPS, all on board might have survived.
Remember the days of old when one had to have the Decca but could launch without the Radar?
Seemed ass backwards to me....give up that magic eyeball that could see through darkness, fog, and cloud....for something that gave up the ghost at the first good whiff of Snow or any other kind of static.
Then there was the Consol station in Norway that was still operational...and pointed from the Ekofisk straight back to New Castle....broadcasting at something like 1500 Watts or some silly thing.
Seemed ass backwards to me....give up that magic eyeball that could see through darkness, fog, and cloud....for something that gave up the ghost at the first good whiff of Snow or any other kind of static.
Then there was the Consol station in Norway that was still operational...and pointed from the Ekofisk straight back to New Castle....broadcasting at something like 1500 Watts or some silly thing.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: swansea, wales
Age: 66
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This question for me raises the same issue that pertains to these newer super duper de-icing systems avialable to allow helicopters to perform rescues flying through icing conditions to get to the scene, what if its offshore, you have flown through known icing to ge there, but before you begin your return your system goes unserviceable? Kinda screwed a bit, are you not? I could not help thinking some of the technology can in such instances lead us into quite dangerous situations we would not have persisted in getting into without them leading us to believe we could equally safely be guaranteed a safe return?
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Age: 71
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Start from the premise that anything can fail, so do not RELY on anything. Try and double-up with truly independent systems - 2 GPSs does not hack it, as most of the failure modes are common.
However, you also cannot remove risk, just manage it and control it - if you stay in bed because you are risk averse you will probably die of a heart attack and clogged arteries AND have a dismal existence. Even the UK CAA permit the use of GPS as an IFR approach aid in some cases.
In my experience, there are more problems through poor use of the GPS than errors/failures in the GPS itself: I am not sure that over-reliance is the key problem with GPS at all: blind faith in the digital display, maybe. Knowledge of the system is key, with informed appropriate use.
However, you also cannot remove risk, just manage it and control it - if you stay in bed because you are risk averse you will probably die of a heart attack and clogged arteries AND have a dismal existence. Even the UK CAA permit the use of GPS as an IFR approach aid in some cases.
In my experience, there are more problems through poor use of the GPS than errors/failures in the GPS itself: I am not sure that over-reliance is the key problem with GPS at all: blind faith in the digital display, maybe. Knowledge of the system is key, with informed appropriate use.
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Where I'm pointing...
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The irony is I had a CFI try bollock me on a night flight and a cross country for NOT using the GPS, as I was using my paper charts and calculations to stay current, so I can see why some CPL's may have a stronger inclination to the device.
GoodGrief.....Good Grief! How sweet it must be! The absence of such "structure" must simplify life quite a bit!
In the early 70's....flying Jet Rangers around Upper Volta, Ghana, Mali, and Ivory Coast was like that pretty much....as lots of the areas on what maps we did have were blank and were labelled "Reported Mountains, Valleys, and Streams". We hand drew some of our own maps for areas where there were none to be had.
There we were back to Mag Compass....Clock....and the ability to imitate a Homing Pigeon. Add in not being able to speak French or any of the local dialects made Life all the more enjoyable.
In the early 70's....flying Jet Rangers around Upper Volta, Ghana, Mali, and Ivory Coast was like that pretty much....as lots of the areas on what maps we did have were blank and were labelled "Reported Mountains, Valleys, and Streams". We hand drew some of our own maps for areas where there were none to be had.
There we were back to Mag Compass....Clock....and the ability to imitate a Homing Pigeon. Add in not being able to speak French or any of the local dialects made Life all the more enjoyable.
Oh, you youngsters, how good life is in an SUV.
Back in the 1800 we had horse carriages, underpowered, slow and without air condition.
There were no road signs, not even roads, just ahead we went.We were adventurers...
Back in the 1800 we had horse carriages, underpowered, slow and without air condition.
There were no road signs, not even roads, just ahead we went.We were adventurers...
On a more serious note:
SASless, may I assume that your early seventies african Jetbox flying was within the military? If so, there is quite a difference to 21st century commercial flying.
I think a customer who pays almost €30 for a minute of helicopter time is entitled to a no BS direct line flight wherever possible.
Customers have stopwatches nowadays and they have learned how to multiply.
We used to fly a customer to a certain location often.When I was on vacation a colleague took over. The customer asked why that other pilot needed 12 minutes more time than me on the same route, same aircraft, no BS from ATC.
Needles to say the customer refused further flights with that pilot.
Of course you do your planning, course, time distance, etc, but nowadays that's only backup.
SASless, may I assume that your early seventies african Jetbox flying was within the military? If so, there is quite a difference to 21st century commercial flying.
I think a customer who pays almost €30 for a minute of helicopter time is entitled to a no BS direct line flight wherever possible.
Customers have stopwatches nowadays and they have learned how to multiply.
We used to fly a customer to a certain location often.When I was on vacation a colleague took over. The customer asked why that other pilot needed 12 minutes more time than me on the same route, same aircraft, no BS from ATC.
Needles to say the customer refused further flights with that pilot.
Of course you do your planning, course, time distance, etc, but nowadays that's only backup.
Contract work for the UN spraying rivers to kill Black Flies.....the contract was held by different companies over the twenty or so years the contract lasted.
Straight civvie flying it was....and we rarely carried a customer along....departed on Monday Morning from Bobo...and returned late on Friday...or Mid-day Saturday. Night stopped in towns...and hit fuel stashes during the day. Hand pumped all our fuel and chemical. No radio contact except when taking off or landing at Bobo....and maybe one other airport during the week.
We also had a Pilatus Porter rigged for spraying as well along with the Jet Rangers.
Straight civvie flying it was....and we rarely carried a customer along....departed on Monday Morning from Bobo...and returned late on Friday...or Mid-day Saturday. Night stopped in towns...and hit fuel stashes during the day. Hand pumped all our fuel and chemical. No radio contact except when taking off or landing at Bobo....and maybe one other airport during the week.
We also had a Pilatus Porter rigged for spraying as well along with the Jet Rangers.
I think a customer who pays almost €30 for a minute of helicopter time is entitled to a no BS direct line flight wherever possible.
Customers have stopwatches nowadays and they have learned how to multiply.
Customers have stopwatches nowadays and they have learned how to multiply.
With technology being what it is TODAY, why people don't use it, God only knows... Sure, check the compass and set the DI/VOR/NDB, but like you say, every minute counts. If it isn't a customer, it's the boss counting every second you're off course
Can't say I've drawn my own maps while flying across some God foresaken african country but, I have added a few things as we went by. Luckily, my flying time in africa wasn't before fire was discovered (
sorry SAS). I've done quite a few long ferry trips acrross the dark continent, always with 2 gps', maps in a folder, and my trusty Jepp hi/low as a reference along the way.
We had an ex mil guy who did the trip, old school style on maps, as he didn't trust gps, and needless to say, his flight time was quite a bit more than the gps pilots...and needless to say, the boss wasn't too happy with that extra flight time, which meant he wasn't on the roster again.
Nowadays, it's all about saving time and money, and not building hours.
Most of my ferries are catching winds at high altitude (up to 10000) and saving the $$$$, and when flying across africa where most of the navaids can't even remember what they are supposed to do, you need a GPS. Saved about 2.5hrs on a return ferry once sitting at FL100, which of course didn't go into my Xmas bonus
.Most GPS errors come in from human error... i.e. putting in the wrong way points, or just plain not knowing how to use it. I did a back seat flight in a small plane with a friend and a 10000+ hr fixed wing instructor, who had a nice big 11x13cm garmin display on the dash showing them exactly where they were, and they overflew the airport in a bit of haze... All they knew was how to turn it on! Guess who stopped using an old instructor after that conversation once we landed.
Oh, and to see if the GPS is accurate or not, check the display page that gives you the distance of accuracy it has aquired...
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 72
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes
on
14 Posts
Nothing wrong with using a GPS - IF you keep a check on its results and gross error check it, and have a map handy if it goes wrong. Never assume that things electrical are producing accurate readings.
One thing super-reliance on it does encourage is a change in the decision making process - with much of the navigation task taken away from you, there is more time to get yourself into deeper trouble if the weather is bad. Also, as it is very accurate, there may be more people in the same airspace looking for the same spot - also bad in poor vis.
Phil
One thing super-reliance on it does encourage is a change in the decision making process - with much of the navigation task taken away from you, there is more time to get yourself into deeper trouble if the weather is bad. Also, as it is very accurate, there may be more people in the same airspace looking for the same spot - also bad in poor vis.
Phil
GPS is a navaid, nothing else but is a very good navaid. Like all navaids it has to be checked before you rely on it. That's why you do a frequency and ID check on a VOR or ILS. A simple check of it knowing where it is and which direction it is going to send you is always required using a seperate aid or the simple eyeball.
There are people who will happily follow a GPS telling them how to get to a westerly destination whilst they are shading their eyes from the morning sun.
There are people who will happily follow a GPS telling them how to get to a westerly destination whilst they are shading their eyes from the morning sun.
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: England & Scotland
Age: 63
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Or being affected by the rise in GPS jamming
BBC News - Sentinel project research reveals UK GPS jammer use
Unlikely to have a problem going offshore, I would have thought. Can't see the truck drivers making that big a mistake!
BBC News - Sentinel project research reveals UK GPS jammer use
Unlikely to have a problem going offshore, I would have thought. Can't see the truck drivers making that big a mistake!
A quick look on some academic databases...
Cambridge Journals Online - Abstract
http://odra.faa.gov/about/office_org...4.pdf#page=107
http://ipv6.faa.gov/about/office_org...6.pdf#page=121
http://www.bluecoat.org/reports/Heron_97_GPS.pdf
The Role of Trust and Interaction in GPS Related Accidents: A Human Factors Safety Assessment of the Global Positioning System (GPS) - Enlighten
This sounds like a worthwhile and interesting research question to be pursuing, where are you hoping to go with the research?
G
Cambridge Journals Online - Abstract
http://odra.faa.gov/about/office_org...4.pdf#page=107
http://ipv6.faa.gov/about/office_org...6.pdf#page=121
http://www.bluecoat.org/reports/Heron_97_GPS.pdf
The Role of Trust and Interaction in GPS Related Accidents: A Human Factors Safety Assessment of the Global Positioning System (GPS) - Enlighten
This sounds like a worthwhile and interesting research question to be pursuing, where are you hoping to go with the research?
G
.
Wot about a speed boat driver...
"...Alan Grant of the General Lighthouse Authorities carried out an experiment in 2008 to assess the degree to which ships would be affected by a jamming signal. Using a relatively low-power jamming signal off the eastern English coast, he found that ships coming into the jamming area suddenly read locations anywhere from Ireland to Scandinavia..."
BBC News - Sat-nav systems under growing threat from 'jammers'
.
Can't see the truck drivers making that big a mistake!...
"...Alan Grant of the General Lighthouse Authorities carried out an experiment in 2008 to assess the degree to which ships would be affected by a jamming signal. Using a relatively low-power jamming signal off the eastern English coast, he found that ships coming into the jamming area suddenly read locations anywhere from Ireland to Scandinavia..."
BBC News - Sat-nav systems under growing threat from 'jammers'
.
Flyting.....We had plenty of "fire" and told the Boss Fellah....if we ever became overdue and had not seen another helicopter tracing our route looking for us within three days....all he had to do was look for a very dark,dense, column of black smoke. We might not get found but then the helicopter would not either!