Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

ec-120 or r44?

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

ec-120 or r44?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Mar 2011, 19:27
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: WAW
Age: 34
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ec-120 or r44?

For a private operator doing something like 100-150 hours a year what would be a better choice? Flying would be on a "just for fun basis", I hear eurocopter takes AGES for repairs but that would be fine in this case. How much would insurance be in a ec120 because I couldn't find it listed anywhere.
Thanks pprune'ers!
eeeaddict is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2011, 20:17
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 956
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
That's kinda like asking "Ford escort or Audi RS6?" :-)
krypton_john is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2011, 20:25
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: UK, SE
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You could pop a PM to John R81 or wait for him.
PotentialPilot is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2011, 20:54
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are other options - B206, EN480B, H500, Gazelle....

Insurance is normally % of the insured hull value, with a factor for the pilot(s) experience, intended use, estimated hours, etc - c.6% would be typical, I suppose
FLY 7 is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2011, 21:10
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Belgium
Age: 60
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Insurance on a Turbine is usually lower than for a piston. When we went from R44 to EC120 the insurance was only twice the R44! The price of the EC120 was 4 times that of a R44.

For the rest you just can't compare the two machines.
HillerBee is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2011, 21:41
  #6 (permalink)  
puntosaurus
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The sort of questions you need to be asking if you really want to decide on the merits of the two machines is do I need five seats ? Do I need baggage space ? Can I afford the price difference ?

However, anyone thinking of actually buying a helicopter has already crossed a line where it's not really about the helicopter any more.

Of course you can compare the two machines.
 
Old 6th Mar 2011, 21:50
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: WAW
Age: 34
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
H500 I love the look but no baggage compartment, and bad legroom at backseat, bell 206 ugly, and they stopped production so parts will soon be more expensive, enstrom might go bust any time so kinda wana stay away. Does anyone know the doc of the ec-120?
eeeaddict is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2011, 22:03
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South of UK
Posts: 520
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
bell 206 ugly
And the R44 is a looker? Boy, you need to go to Specsavers.

Ah, the perspective of youth.

206 jock is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2011, 22:28
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: WAW
Age: 34
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lol im not a troll, just saying that r44 is a lot cheper than a jetranger (to buy and run) so I can take the hit in the looks department, the is an amazing machine though
eeeaddict is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2011, 22:55
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: n/a
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm with 206 Jock. How could you possibly call the 206 ugly????
Never in Balance is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2011, 23:13
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: swansea, wales
Age: 66
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
indeed, I have never seen an ugly 206, I coauld watch them all day, and I am not known for gazing fondly at ugly specimens of any kind.
bolkow is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2011, 23:30
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: WAW
Age: 34
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lol it's a relative thing, a 206 is kinda ugly compared to a eurocopter, also I don't really like 60's styling (call me crazy)
eeeaddict is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2011, 01:23
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 956
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Which EC?

IMHO the B206 is not ugly but less pretty than an EC120/130/135, just as pretty as an AS350 and prettier than an EC145.

Also much prettier than any Robbo or MD.

NZ$0.02 worth anyway.
krypton_john is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2011, 01:56
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Down Under
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
eeeadict - can't say I agree with you about the Bell 206 being ugly. Look what I found on another thread.



Final conclusive evidence of the beauty of the 206's.
Bell_Flyer is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2011, 05:08
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Belgium
Age: 60
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Definitily NOT ugly
HillerBee is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2011, 05:35
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 956
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
That Bell needs urgent inspection regarding partially deployed air bags.
krypton_john is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2011, 07:17
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: N/A
Age: 56
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about a 350

With the same budget of the EC120, I would take into consideration an older model of 350.
Maybe not so good looking, for sure a better performer.
I met an owner personally, a private non expert pilot.
He got scared few times.
Extra power means safety, especially if you're planning your trips with some passengers and you're not used to manage low power approaches and take-offs.
vaibronco is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2011, 07:25
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 1°21'10.20"N - 103°56'36.21"E
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And look what I found when looking for a R44




PS: hope the owner doesn't claim copyright issues ..
ecureilx is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2011, 08:48
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near the bottom
Posts: 1,356
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
krypton_john's right - there is no comparison! They're like chalk and cheese
A 5 seat modern turbine with glass cockpit, compared with a 4 seat piston designed in the 80's?!

One looks gorgeous, the other is butt ugly.
One sounds like a helicopter, the other sounds like a tractor.

You pays your money, you takes your choice - the R44 is great at what it was designed to do and for the market it was aimed at, but is a class apart from any EC machine.
toptobottom is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2011, 09:04
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South of UK
Posts: 520
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Sorry ecureilx, that looks like that R44 is suffering from BOBFOC to me (Body Off Baywatch, Face Off Crimewatch).

To the OP, when you get to some sort of resolution to your strange dilemma, why not add the R66 to your fantasy list? It's like a light turbine and an R44 got married and they had a baby together
206 jock is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.