Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

IR approaches into private sites? (UK)

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

IR approaches into private sites? (UK)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Aug 2010, 07:23
  #41 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 419 Likes on 221 Posts
Crab, so presumably Cardiff Radar would also pick up the other aircraft and provide you with information / separation iaw the service you normally request, especially if the other aircraft was using a transponder.

Is your Seaking TCAS equipped, btw? Many modern IFR helicopters are; I'm not sure if the MOD have got around to bringing yours up to date yet like they have seen fit to do with other RAF types. If not, I would think there would be a good case to do so, even in these cash-strapped days.

Seems to me you are presuming that pilots here carry out their own business in IMC "blind", i.e. with no rt contact and no radar service. I certainly wouldn't if a service was available; I don't think that anyone else with common sense would.

Having said that, I did once see a mode 'A' only R-44 (as an unstabilised single, presumably non-IFR equipped and certainly not allowed to fly IFR in UK) who passed only just beneath me in solid cloud under the London TMA a few years back. We were in receipt of a radar information service at the time, he was certainly not on the local radar unit's frequency. The cloudbase was about 1200' and we were at 2400', so he certainly wasn't scud running!
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2010, 07:59
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,321
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
No not TCAS equipped but I don't believe many mil aircraft are. Cardiff's radar service is limited in our area however and below top of drop is not much protection.

I wouldn't operate IMC with no radar and RT either unless I really have to (not much radar coverage in the wee small hours on a job inland away from major airports).

Operating in the cruise IMC and flying quadrantals to ensure separation is not the same as descending IMC to cloudbreak/land with no radar or RT (or worse, pretending you are VMC so ATC don't panic).
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2010, 12:04
  #43 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 419 Likes on 221 Posts
I agree but a grey area (pun unintended) exists at the low altitudes we rotary folk are often required to operate at.

A lot of light aircraft and rotary wing (albeit away from your area, over lower terrain and under the London TMA, for example) are often obliged to fly in IMC, but do not fly high enough to use quadrantals, nor are they able to climb higher.

You and your colleagues should push hard for TCAS; you might be surprised how useful (and interesting!) it can be. Even the police aircraft are now widely so equipped. I mention that because I know as an ex-police pilot (and ex-SAR boy too), they are always very much budget constrained but saw it as a priority and did obtain it some years ago. I've operated for over a decade with it and wouldn't like to go back to flying without it, especially when under IFR in these days of decreasing LARS cover.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2010, 12:33
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,247
Received 330 Likes on 183 Posts
they are always very much budget constrained but saw it as a priority and did obtain it some years ago.
I imagine the cause was greatly assisted by having a senior CAA Flight Ops chap inside a Police AS355 whilst a Tucano took a chunk out of it
212man is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2010, 12:45
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,321
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
A lot of light aircraft and rotary wing (albeit away from your area, over lower terrain and under the London TMA, for example) are often obliged to fly in IMC, but do not fly high enough to use quadrantals, nor are they able to climb higher.
and presumably are therefore in receipt of a radar service and would only let down using a proper published procedure. If not, what the f*** are they doing?
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2010, 16:57
  #46 (permalink)  
The One Your Mother Warned You About
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Wherever they pay me
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Crab;

Go fly the ILS into Oxford one grotty weekend and see how many TCAS contacts there are between ToD and DA, very few talking to Brize LARS and even less talking to Oxford. I filed on one there a while ago, he flew from a neighbouring airfield and ran a business at Oxford, his attitude was "I was in the open FIR, why should I talk to anyone?" he was aware of the ILS, but too selfish to care.

I honestly think a lot of these guys are bimbling around busy airspace IMC following GPS moving maps and have never noticed the approach symbol on the CAA charts, if they even carry them. The airspace between Manchester and the south coast is incredibly busy compared to your patch with, GA at all altitudes below controlled airspace and from what my TCAS and radar services tell me quite happy to fly around IMC without talking to a soul.

SND
Francis Frogbound is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2010, 19:15
  #47 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 419 Likes on 221 Posts
and presumably are therefore in receipt of a radar service and would only let down using a proper published procedure. If not, what the f*** are they doing?
Transitting Class G, around the Heathrow, City, Gatwick, Luton and Stansted CTRs, that's what they are doing.

You would have to ask the individual pilots why some don't obtain a service if that's what they do, especially now that Farnborough LARS has thankfully been increased in capability. For years before there was no cover available north of LHR.

However, obviously there is sometimes no need to carry out an IMC letdown if suitable VMC weather exists at their destination.

FiFB, Yes, that area around Kidlington is a difficult one to safely transit, with Oxford IFR departures not always speaking to Brize Radar.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2010, 19:31
  #48 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
Doesn't this discussion reinforce the fact that given the number of non-TCAS equipped aircraft there are out there, even if you don't create your very own smoking hole at the bottom of some GPS cowboy inspired game of blind-man's bluff, your chances of hitting some other daft sod on the way to the inquest are also quite high?
Two's in is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2010, 20:01
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Are there any stats available for IMC mid-air collisions? I've never heard of a single one, but know of many VMC mid-airs, especially around airports. On that basis, I think I'm going to fly everywhere I can IMC

JJ
jellycopter is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2010, 20:30
  #50 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 419 Likes on 221 Posts
JJ, Yes, there is strange logic in doing so! IFR aircraft are mandated to have a transponder. VFR aircraft probably won't go IFR, they might even stay grounded if the weather is remotely poor.

Use TCAS, get a LARS service and avoid the madding crowds, especially if you can get above overcast cloud. Just beware below 3,000 feet for the bloke coming the other way in cloud at the same altitude, without his transponder on, not talking, no LARS....
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2010, 14:04
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Age: 69
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have heard that these types of approach can be done with the aid of an iPhone 4. Perhaps all pilots at Patriot Redhill should be issued with them so that they can fly with a bit more confidence. Normally allows safe IFR down to the ground. Alternatively, 20 years + experience and a training in the forces ...
thewarnerbros is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2010, 15:02
  #52 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,659
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
even if you don't create your very own smoking hole at the bottom of some GPS cowboy inspired game of blind-man's bluff, your chances of hitting some other daft sod on the way to the inquest are also quite high?
One of the funniest quotes i've read in ages. Well it would be funny if it wasn't so bloody serious!
helimutt is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2010, 17:14
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Age: 69
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Come on Helimut ... Get a life - or even an iPhone 4 ... It might help you get a new job
thewarnerbros is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2010, 20:12
  #54 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,659
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I won't get a job. Can't afford an iPhone4. I have my fleet of luxury cars and my mansion to sell now.



helimutt is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2010, 20:16
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sorry but your last one wasn't a luxury car HM
Flingingwings is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2010, 21:29
  #56 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,659
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My bloody point exactly! I can't afford any.


Anyway, 280hr pilot, 16hrs advanced hovering R22 experience, GPS savvy, PPL, seeks lucrative job. Will work for beer!


Last edited by helimutt; 23rd Aug 2010 at 08:09.
helimutt is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2010, 21:38
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Age: 69
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With your experience, you must be worth £35,000 pa at Patriot Redhill.
thewarnerbros is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2010, 08:10
  #58 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,659
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That Much??? I'm off with my CV then. Cheers for the heads-up.

I love how friendly the folk are on this site. No p!ss taking at all.
helimutt is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2010, 08:32
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Age: 69
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No problem. I will tell Bond hr that we have one less to get rid of ...
thewarnerbros is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2010, 22:42
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Returning to the thread topic, I wonder just what the facts are ref accidents on IFR let downs to private sites - that were attributable to the approach not being an approved precision/non precision approach but a GPS one?

Seems to me the Irish S76 accident was really not the fault of a GPS approach - it was more about pilots simply not performing the approach they intended, accurately. Similar to just getting too low on an ILS and hitting the ground, for example. Interestingly this S76 accident throws up a hazard of two crew ops - here both rather assumed the other knew what he was doing without enough questioning.

Moving on to the other UK accident mentioned, with owner Philip Carter near Peterborough in an AS355F2, this was again not a consequence of hitting the ground from inaccurate GPS position or hitting unforseen obstacles. It was either from excessive descent in IMC to no limit or within 100ft or so AGL, or more likely I suspect descent to too poor VMC night conditions and then loss of control effectively through then entering IMC at low level and speed whilst transiting the mile to the destination.

So, what examples in the UK have there been of accidents into private sites as a direct consequence of an unapproved IFR let downs?
rotorspeed is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.