Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Agusta AW139

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Agusta AW139

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Dec 2008, 22:35
  #681 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ISZ - not the end of the world, but you can see it from here.
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Think it's not the first CHC 139 baggage bay warning, but this latest one's a wee bit more erm, alarming than the earlier one.
Cuddles is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2008, 12:36
  #682 (permalink)  
THM
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heard that the Cyprus have ordered 2 AW139s yesterday, can anyone confirm ?
This would bring the total to 5 for the Cyprus government (3 for the national guard).
THM is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2008, 12:47
  #683 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: jura
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hello there!

I am about to get a type on the 139. Anybody got some info somewhere i can read?

Thanks
M_Pilot is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2008, 16:48
  #684 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Long Nose vs. Short Nose

We're a corporate operator adding a 139 to our operation.
Does anyone have experience with both versions (not the SAR extended long nose) who could shed some light on the real world differences?
Range is important and we would need to operate with the Aux. Fuel Cell.
Is CG the big concern? What about nose hi attitude during lgds and in a hover, and how's the visibility for off airport ops?
Someone put this in the bosses ear (not an aviator) and he's concerned. Is this an issue?

Any input would be appreciated.

Thanks and Merry X-Mas.
HeloDrvr is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2008, 06:49
  #685 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Europe trying to enjoy retirement “YES”
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HeloDrvr.
Try trawling through the whole thread, lots of gen and info. News on some of the problems developing with aircraft over about 1.500 hrs would be cool.

Tail boom delaminating, anyone received a new tail boom with the build changes and better quality control. How are they performing?

Any other issues re the boom would be cool.

Outhouse.
outhouse is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2009, 13:24
  #686 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: roma
Age: 54
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4 axis vgp approaches

hello to everyone of the 139's community.

my question:

are vgp approaches possible on any waypoint in the database or are them possible only on non precision approaches published for a determined location??

how do you set them up on the FMS? (as far as vertical constrains shown on the right side of the mcdu screen..)

how do you shot them?

Thanks
nutsiest is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2009, 14:25
  #687 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: planet earth
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Software..........
Bagage fire is just the warning.
But steps extended and cargo hoos armed on the cas when the system is not installed(or active)
Also the advisory landing light comes on.
Think honeywell should do something. 4.8 software is released to early maybe. found a few bugs in it.
Seen this malfunction now for the third time...
chinook<NL> is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2009, 10:48
  #688 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 51E
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Folks what is the maximum height reported for the aw139 ? 10000' or 15000.......
S.M.S is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2009, 11:29
  #689 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: italy
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maximum height reported for the aw139

Maximum height reported for the aw139 is:

http://www.spaghettifile.com/viewtrack.php?id=461711

Pigi
pigi is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2009, 14:09
  #690 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cornwall
Age: 75
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Increased AUM to 6800 kg

Supplement 50 to the RFM allows for increased AUM to 6800 kg BUT no operations from grass surfaces permitted over 6400 kg. CHC are operating from a grass strip at North Denes and there may be others in the same boat. I wonder what strategies are being hatched to take advantage of the extra lift capability yet avoiding the prospect of manoeuvring on the soft stuff. Take mission fuel at the first stop maybe, having left with one-stop fuel? Would be a shame not to boost the payload one way or another.

G
Geoffersincornwall is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2009, 19:25
  #691 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 715
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
The increase in gross weight isn't an RFM update, it is a Supplement requiring a kit to be installed. Anybody know if CHC or any other operator has installed the kit to allow for using the higher gross?

Typical bizarro Italians with their Alice in Wonderland Limitations. "No operations on grass surfaces". I guess you can sprinkle down some gravel or horse-manure and be legal again. The 139 really is a helicopter, and just maybe, on very rare occasions, might have to land away from an airport. Grass, mud, wood decks, steel decks, snow, dirt, rock, sand...........
malabo is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2009, 20:38
  #692 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ...in view of the 'Southern Cross' ...
Posts: 1,383
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mmmmm ....

I believe the "Helicopters NewZealand/Australia" machines were delivered with the increased Gross weight kit installed.


spinwing is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2009, 22:51
  #693 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: At home
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Be worth asking them if there are any other maintenance or life penalties if you operate it over 6400kg, I would expect this information to be somewhere other than the FM

Never ususally get anything for free, be interesting to know
UCLogic is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2009, 23:21
  #694 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tax-land.
Posts: 909
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Malabo, I think that by "grassy surfaces" those pesky Italians meant "irregular" surfaces, since those surfaces can put further strain on the landing gear.
I also think that by operations they meant "ground taxi".
You can always lift straight to a hover.
Part of the supplement includes doublers to be installed to the MLG bogies.
Anyway, I have the supplement somewhere and I'll double check it.

Those pesky Italians.
tottigol is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2009, 00:20
  #695 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ...in view of the 'Southern Cross' ...
Posts: 1,383
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mmmmm ....

I'm more concerned about changes to the CoG envelope if any?


spinwing is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2009, 06:01
  #696 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: italy
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Tottigol wrote: ...Those pesky Italians.

Why don't you fly Bell or Sikorsky?

Tottigol...Totti is one of the most famous italian football player and gol , in italian, sounds like goal!!!!
A pesky italian!!

Last edited by pigi; 14th Jan 2009 at 06:42.
pigi is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2009, 06:20
  #697 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: far east..longway from home..
Age: 52
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And to add some questions to 139 specialists:
- after you pay for that upgrade (I heared about 500000 euros per chopper...), are you able to take off at 6800kg IGE in ISA+20 ? What about the weight in the hover
OGE in the same conditions?

Thanks a lot...
tophelios is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2009, 07:39
  #698 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ...in view of the 'Southern Cross' ...
Posts: 1,383
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mmmmm ....

"are you able to take off at 6800kg IGE in ISA+20 ?"


YES ! what a machine eh?



spinwing is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2009, 11:43
  #699 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tax-land.
Posts: 909
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Another reason for the 6400Kg limitation from grass surfaces may be because of the wheel size and sinking.
tottigol is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2009, 13:35
  #700 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cornwall
Age: 75
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spinwing

C of G envelope - just continue the fore and aft lines up to 6800 and you have the revised envelope. (Make sure you are looking at the CG Envelope Rev 11 which moves the aft limit at 6400kg backwards to 5.504)

Performance at 6,800 Kg - OEI ROC 2.5 minute power

Sea level/40 deg C - 875 ft/min
2000 ft/30 deg C - 800 ft/min
5000 ft/20 deg C - 600 ft/min
8000 ft/10 deg C - 400 ft/min

G.


Last edited by Geoffersincornwall; 15th Jan 2009 at 15:35.
Geoffersincornwall is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.