What would happen to a Helicopter if it was in space?
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: melbourne
Age: 48
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
While coming in on final the other day to the Inter Space station i took this shot. The R44 held up pretty well due to the solar flare that came from no where. But hey you get that on the big jobs.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Over here
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The engine(s) obviously won't run, because there is no air. The pilots die immediately for the same reason. There may be sillier propositions possible, but I don't know of one offhand.
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 419 Likes
on
221 Posts
Whatever else happened to it, it would (just the once) be the fastest helicopter ever. And then burn up on re-entry to the helipad.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: leicester
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
.
PRACTICE ENGINE FAILURE GO!!!
lever down - no need
Right pedal - no need
Throttle closed - Is it running???
Upcheck - what for?
Touch checks - oh whats the point!!!
eeeerrrrr... now what? Mint anyone???
MADY
cleartorotate, love the shot! Should one keep the fresh air vents closed when in space??? Just a thought!
PRACTICE ENGINE FAILURE GO!!!
lever down - no need
Right pedal - no need
Throttle closed - Is it running???
Upcheck - what for?
Touch checks - oh whats the point!!!
eeeerrrrr... now what? Mint anyone???
MADY
cleartorotate, love the shot! Should one keep the fresh air vents closed when in space??? Just a thought!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We could have some fun with this question by breaking it into two parts:
1. What happens when a helicopter operates in a vacuum?
Not much.
2. What happens when a helicopter operates in normal atmosphere but with continued zero-g? Or how much control would the pilot have with a helicopter inside a large pressurised space station?
1. What happens when a helicopter operates in a vacuum?
Not much.
2. What happens when a helicopter operates in normal atmosphere but with continued zero-g? Or how much control would the pilot have with a helicopter inside a large pressurised space station?
So stuck on very long and boring train journey I pondered what would happen if you put a helicopter in space,...
...Of course you would sort out the small issues of the getting the engines to work and the pilots pay and conditions but, What would Happen?
2. What happens when a helicopter operates in normal atmosphere but with continued zero-g? Or how much control would the pilot have with a helicopter inside a large pressurised space station?
For the exercise perhaps we could use the Hughes 300.
Soon as you switched on mechanical gyros the stupid thing would start tumbling, y'know... throw some rotating fuel pumps, oil pumps, starters, a couple whirling donks, some accessories.....
The sleeper gyro is the fuselage itself.
Anyway, i'm of to look at videos of Sopwith camels to try and get my head around gyro effects.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Below Escape Velocity
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
binghi,
I stand by my statement on gyros. As you spun up the various heavier masses with greater rotational moments of inertia things would start coming unglued pretty quickly in 0-g. You would have to start the thing up and allow it to achieve steady state in some kind of anchored system for it not to do so. As soon as a pump started transferring mass within an aircraft's system, you'd have some motion. All these forces are insignificant against the weight and friction of an aircraft on the ground in 1-g.
You'd have no aerodynamic effects to speak of until you fired up an engine or two... the engines would provide some degree of thrust depending upon the alignment of the exhausts (whether it's a turbine or a recip) and intake and some kind of impulse motion. While the rotors would again impart some degree of rotational motion as they accelerated, there'd be aerodynamic effects as well... let's just say I'll let you try it first without things being firmly tied in place.
There is, somewhere, a video of these guys playing with some gyro binoculars in space (which I can't find) and the internal friction of the gyros eventually leads to the thing precessing like mad about all three axes.
You first.
I stand by my statement on gyros. As you spun up the various heavier masses with greater rotational moments of inertia things would start coming unglued pretty quickly in 0-g. You would have to start the thing up and allow it to achieve steady state in some kind of anchored system for it not to do so. As soon as a pump started transferring mass within an aircraft's system, you'd have some motion. All these forces are insignificant against the weight and friction of an aircraft on the ground in 1-g.
You'd have no aerodynamic effects to speak of until you fired up an engine or two... the engines would provide some degree of thrust depending upon the alignment of the exhausts (whether it's a turbine or a recip) and intake and some kind of impulse motion. While the rotors would again impart some degree of rotational motion as they accelerated, there'd be aerodynamic effects as well... let's just say I'll let you try it first without things being firmly tied in place.
There is, somewhere, a video of these guys playing with some gyro binoculars in space (which I can't find) and the internal friction of the gyros eventually leads to the thing precessing like mad about all three axes.
You first.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sydney, Oz.
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Reminds me of the photos (not photoshopped) posted by John Eacott landing on the Enterprise.
http://www.pprune.org/4667951-post4442.html
http://www.pprune.org/4667951-post4442.html
I stand by my statement on gyros. As you spun up the various heavier masses with greater rotational moments of inertia things would start coming unglued pretty quickly in 0-g. You would have to start the thing up and allow it to achieve steady state in some kind of anchored system for it not to do so. As soon as a pump started transferring mass within an aircraft's system, you'd have some motion. All these forces are insignificant against the weight and friction of an aircraft on the ground in 1-g.
You'd have no aerodynamic effects to speak of until you fired up an engine or two... the engines would provide some degree of thrust depending upon the alignment of the exhausts (whether it's a turbine or a recip) and intake and some kind of impulse motion. While the rotors would again impart some degree of rotational motion as they accelerated, there'd be aerodynamic effects as well... let's just say I'll let you try it first without things being firmly tied in place.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Um.. Lifting.. brilliant demo of gyroscopic stabilisation! 
Next time you go up there you should convince 'em to let you bring a heli in your back pocket - maybe the one Cattletruck used.
Svenestron, Flying Binghi,
I've been thinking about this in my off moments. I think the heli (lets say Hughes 300 to save any embarasing tail shedding) would actually "fly" relatively normally. The collective would control "upward" velocity (not acceleration) but would be more sensitive than in 1g. Cyclic would be much less sensitive since only the hinge offset would produce pitch/roll moments, but otherwise would manouvre the heli just fine (as long as inputs were small). Clearly the pedals would be more-or-less centred since there would be much less torque.
The biggest problems i can think of is that you could not generate "downwards" velocity and the twistgrip/collective co-relator would be totally unoptimised for "climb". Lets assume the govenor sorts out the last problem. Lets also assume that oil, hydraulic and fuel sytems have had a zero-g overhaul, so all heli systems behave themselves.
Just for fun, lets assume that the machine has been retrimmed to allow a small amount of negative collective...
So: flyable or not?
Next time you go up there you should convince 'em to let you bring a heli in your back pocket - maybe the one Cattletruck used.
Svenestron, Flying Binghi,
I've been thinking about this in my off moments. I think the heli (lets say Hughes 300 to save any embarasing tail shedding) would actually "fly" relatively normally. The collective would control "upward" velocity (not acceleration) but would be more sensitive than in 1g. Cyclic would be much less sensitive since only the hinge offset would produce pitch/roll moments, but otherwise would manouvre the heli just fine (as long as inputs were small). Clearly the pedals would be more-or-less centred since there would be much less torque.
The biggest problems i can think of is that you could not generate "downwards" velocity and the twistgrip/collective co-relator would be totally unoptimised for "climb". Lets assume the govenor sorts out the last problem. Lets also assume that oil, hydraulic and fuel sytems have had a zero-g overhaul, so all heli systems behave themselves.
Just for fun, lets assume that the machine has been retrimmed to allow a small amount of negative collective...
So: flyable or not?
Last edited by Graviman; 17th Jun 2009 at 17:04. Reason: A little more thought about co-relators.
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1-Depending on its altitude and velocity it would either be a satellite or a fire ball on re-entry.
2-If it were travelling at the speed of light upon return the pilot would be much unger than his twin on earth.
3-If it incounter a worm hole it could theoretically return before it left-providing it did not encounter anti-matter.
This question would better be answered by Stephen Hawking
Stephen Hawking, The Big Bang, and God
2-If it were travelling at the speed of light upon return the pilot would be much unger than his twin on earth.
3-If it incounter a worm hole it could theoretically return before it left-providing it did not encounter anti-matter.
This question would better be answered by Stephen Hawking
Stephen Hawking, The Big Bang, and God
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Where I'm pointing...
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can't speak for helicopters, but according to the ESA, Helicopter Pilots will work in space....
Major Tim Peake - Augusta Westland Apache Test Pilot
Major Tim Peake - Augusta Westland Apache Test Pilot
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Whitstable, UK
Age: 53
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hypothetically
If you turned everything off.... you would have the perfect hover!.
If it were runnning.. tail rotor would not have any effect but torque would so you would spin... unless you had a twin counter rotating main rotor system... then no spin... but your exhaust will be pushing you forward... assuming you have sorted the small problem of no air going in at the sharp end!!
Insurance for EOLs might come down a bit....
Space 1999 was so long ago!!!!!
If it were runnning.. tail rotor would not have any effect but torque would so you would spin... unless you had a twin counter rotating main rotor system... then no spin... but your exhaust will be pushing you forward... assuming you have sorted the small problem of no air going in at the sharp end!!
Insurance for EOLs might come down a bit....
Space 1999 was so long ago!!!!!