Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

R22 or R44: preference for rating

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

R22 or R44: preference for rating

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Dec 2008, 21:41
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Mars
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Told my Wife when she reached 36, I'd trade her in for 2x 18 year olds.

She said I wouldn't be able to keep up.

I've kept the Wife and the bikes
screw fix diret is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2008, 10:19
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near the bottom
Posts: 1,354
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It's still not clear why you need to be type rated on a piston machine nor what you'd use the machine for. As a biker and owner of both 22s and 44s (and using the car analogy), the 22 is like a Caterham - small, light, very manoeverable and very much 'seat of your pants', designed really for training and for the driver to have a lot of fun in, rather than serious and practicle transport.

The 44 on the other hand, is more like a Mondeo - more stable, faster, a great compromise between economy and performance, no bells or whistles but reliable and comfortable - plus you can take your mates up.

Despite the apparent similarities, they are complete different machines aimed at completely different requirements - ultimately it's your own circumstances and reasons for doing this that will determine which one is for you.
toptobottom is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2008, 10:57
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,958
Received 21 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by toptobottom
the 22 is <snip> designed really for training and for the driver to have a lot of fun in, rather than serious and practicle transport.
NB. Just to clarify, the R22 was specifically NOT designed for training.
Bravo73 is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2008, 11:02
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You might be better off with a Schweizer or a Bell 47.
Martini for Whirligig on the '47 mention.

You say that you want to FLY a PISTON. forget the schweizer it's almost got correlation.

Find and old '47 with an equally old fair dinkum '47 driver and ask him to show how to fly the throttle box on his '47. Nothing else counts when it comes to learning pistons.

I mean fair dinkum, all of the (R?) models have elctronic correlation governer gizmos that mean you might as well be flying a turbine.
topendtorque is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2008, 19:22
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: US
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TeT
I mean fair dinkum, all of the (R?) models have elctronic correlation governer gizmos that mean you might as well be flying a turbine.
TeT, at the end of every collective in every Robby 22s and 44s there's a switch that turns off/on the governor. My CFIs always turn those things off and make me use my wrist to control the RPM. As the RPM on R22s decay rapidly, I get a good workout.
TheMonk is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2008, 19:56
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 88
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The R22's throttle correlation works about a million times better than a Bell 47 - you make very little manual correction compared to the Bell.

That was the biggest change when I first started flying 47's as a brand-new PPL, and this was in the pre-governor days on the R22 too.
brett s is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.