SARH to go
Chief Bottle Washer
SARH to go???????
Last I looked, the thread title is SARH to go???????
Not "let's attack each other and get personal"
Not "let's attack each other and get personal"
So was this because the Merlin was too expensive once the 12 base option was selected?
How much has this bid actually cost the companies?
How much has this bid actually cost the companies?
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Could someone just remind those of us not quite so in the know who this now leaves in the running (including the companies and/or proposed aircraft involved in any consortia)? Thank you
SW
SW
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sunnyvale Rest Home for the Elderly
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Still in the race
Could someone just remind those of us not quite so in the know who this now leaves in the running (including the companies and/or proposed aircraft involved in any consortia)? Thank
Anybody (SARREMF perhaps) care to shed some light on the reasons behind Bristows/AW withdrawl from the SARH bid?
Bets on CHC getting it now? Will it turn out to be a poison chalice of a contract?
Bets on CHC getting it now? Will it turn out to be a poison chalice of a contract?
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sunnyvale Rest Home for the Elderly
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Money, money, money.
Anybody (SARREMF perhaps) care to shed some light on the reasons behind Bristows/AW withdrawl from the SARH bid?
Bets on CHC getting it now? Will it turn out to be a poison chalice of a contract?
Bets on CHC getting it now? Will it turn out to be a poison chalice of a contract?
So that leaves aircraft which don't have the range/capacity to match the Sea King. So much for 'no lesser capability'!
What else will be compromised and fudged as this competition for a contract, which still has to prove itself value for money, pushes on to its rather protracted conclusion?
Whilst the casualty doesn't care what colour helicopter comes to the rescue, they might be concerned that contractual shortcomings and compromises might mean that no-one comes at all because a reduction in capability was accepted at risk.
What else will be compromised and fudged as this competition for a contract, which still has to prove itself value for money, pushes on to its rather protracted conclusion?
Whilst the casualty doesn't care what colour helicopter comes to the rescue, they might be concerned that contractual shortcomings and compromises might mean that no-one comes at all because a reduction in capability was accepted at risk.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whilst the casualty doesn't care what colour helicopter comes to the rescue, they might be concerned that... no-one comes at all because a reduction in capability was accepted at risk.
Oh and before you say it... Carson blades and a new gearbox are not the gold plated solution to the causes of all unserviceabilities - ask the Navy.
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK/Ireland
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
unfortunately its official
yes the worst fears are proved right - UK Air Rescue have pulled out of SAR-H - just months before deselection to 2 final bids it has been 'realised' by the UK AR team that the contract will not turn a profit.
formal announcement due today/ tomorrow am.
this now leaves the real fear that CHC/ Thales will become he front runner - argggghhh! IPT - you have been warned.
tnb
formal announcement due today/ tomorrow am.
this now leaves the real fear that CHC/ Thales will become he front runner - argggghhh! IPT - you have been warned.
tnb