SAR: Search & Rescue Ops [Archive Copy]
Guest
Posts: n/a
If you are SAR, then the only companies really are Bristow or CHC-Ireland in the British Isles. Neither pay as well as the military but I believe both are trying to get their salaries increased.
As Bristow has the Offshore SAR trial ("Jigsaw")contract, it may be worth fnding out from them if there are any jobs going. If the trial turns in to a full blown contract, then there will be a need for a number of SAR aircrewmen, especially those with past experience, be it from the military or other civil operators.
Try their personnel departments at either Redhill or Aberdeen.
As Bristow has the Offshore SAR trial ("Jigsaw")contract, it may be worth fnding out from them if there are any jobs going. If the trial turns in to a full blown contract, then there will be a need for a number of SAR aircrewmen, especially those with past experience, be it from the military or other civil operators.
Try their personnel departments at either Redhill or Aberdeen.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Abroad
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SAR schedule?
Hello,maybe someone could tell me how a normal civil SAR schedule would look like? One week on and two weeks off? What work time limitations are there for SAR (were you work)? The SAR FDTL are not written in the JAR OPS 3 (yet) I think..... .Thanks
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: On the seven seas
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ODEN
Can't say for UK or US but in Australia the schedule varies accross the board.
We have 24 hours on with 48 hours off. Other places have two 10 hour day shifts followed by two 14 hour night shifts then four days off.
All the time still having to comply with regulatory flight & duty time limitations.
6 weeks annual leave, 10 days sick leave per year -- yadda, yadda, yadda!!
Hope it helps.
PS: Best type of fling there is. <img src="cool.gif" border="0">
Can't say for UK or US but in Australia the schedule varies accross the board.
We have 24 hours on with 48 hours off. Other places have two 10 hour day shifts followed by two 14 hour night shifts then four days off.
All the time still having to comply with regulatory flight & duty time limitations.
6 weeks annual leave, 10 days sick leave per year -- yadda, yadda, yadda!!
Hope it helps.
PS: Best type of fling there is. <img src="cool.gif" border="0">
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: an island
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Normal European routine is 24 Hr On/ 24 Off/24 On/24 Off/24 On and then 96 Hours Off. Leave entitlement varies from company to company, but it is the best flying there is, except at 2am trying to hover over a trawler in 6 to 10 metre seas!!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: On the seven seas
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ODEN
Yes, there are more allotted days off but it depends on how many pilots are on the roster. If you have four full-time pilots, then the 10/14 hour roster gives four days off.
We have three full time pilots. It is all relative. The time off is directly proportional to the time worked but there are so many variables to the rostering it's not funny.
Cheers
Yes, there are more allotted days off but it depends on how many pilots are on the roster. If you have four full-time pilots, then the 10/14 hour roster gives four days off.
We have three full time pilots. It is all relative. The time off is directly proportional to the time worked but there are so many variables to the rostering it's not funny.
Cheers
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Spain
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It depends, some bases we have 4 pilots then you are working half time at your preference, 7on/7off most times, if not we have 3 pilots and then you work 20 days on 10 days off, 24 hours a day, being out of base with response time of half an hour from noon to next mornig 10 am.. .I thnk it must be the worst ratio duty/free time in the world, what do you think?
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: AB, Canada
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
matador, in Canada our SAR schedule is close to the same. 9.5 days off per month, the rest is a 24 hour shift every two days, and 72 hour shifts over the weekends. We're doing that with 6 pilots (two pilot aircraft) right now, so it works out to about the same as you have except our schedule is irregular.
Normally we do this with 12 pilots but then we have many other taskings and duties.
Normally we do this with 12 pilots but then we have many other taskings and duties.
Technique and experience for mountain rescue
Hi guys,
i would appreciate any comments to some questions about the techniques and experiences on mountain rescue ops.
We are using BO 105 and BK 117 helicopters for transporting rescuers by hoist or fixed line. The insertion and extraction of rescuers and patient in mountains, some times it's a tricky operation. On "short haul" the rescuers are fixed to the end of a long line hooked to a double reduntant attachment. Hoist ops should be known. Maybe it would be interesting to discuss the several methods, line lenghts, rescue equipment (rescue bag), crew, practice, mirrors, emergency procedures... .
We use tyromont rescue bags, one pilot at the controls using mirrors to hold the position, for hoist ops a winch operator and a two man rescue team. Line lenghts up to 150 ft. The rescuers are equipped with a personally seat harness, helmets with radios und some alpine stuff for rescue and self protection. I think the hoist ops is the better variant, but needs an additionally crew member and hoists are expensive. Fixed line is cheaper but needs more crew experience.
i would appreciate any comments to some questions about the techniques and experiences on mountain rescue ops.
We are using BO 105 and BK 117 helicopters for transporting rescuers by hoist or fixed line. The insertion and extraction of rescuers and patient in mountains, some times it's a tricky operation. On "short haul" the rescuers are fixed to the end of a long line hooked to a double reduntant attachment. Hoist ops should be known. Maybe it would be interesting to discuss the several methods, line lenghts, rescue equipment (rescue bag), crew, practice, mirrors, emergency procedures... .
We use tyromont rescue bags, one pilot at the controls using mirrors to hold the position, for hoist ops a winch operator and a two man rescue team. Line lenghts up to 150 ft. The rescuers are equipped with a personally seat harness, helmets with radios und some alpine stuff for rescue and self protection. I think the hoist ops is the better variant, but needs an additionally crew member and hoists are expensive. Fixed line is cheaper but needs more crew experience.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: AB, Canada
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mountain rescue technique is not really something I can pass through this forum, but I'll add a few thoughts.
It is dangerous, challenging, diverse, and rewarding. I believe the ideal pilot for this will have plenty experience in Heli-ski, longlining, IFR ops and on-scene EMS. The machine needs a HOGE above the expected rescue altitude, with capacity for the victim(s) and fuel to make the hospital. Also, the helicopter should be able to handle strong wind from any quadrant.
We use a 255' hoist. Ideally we hoist between 35 and 50 feet, but sometimes trees and terrain dictate a higher hoist. If the trees are more than 255', we hoist our rescuers down 255' then they rappel off the hook to the ground. The hoist operator tells us where the site is with reference to the helicopter using arbitrary units that are based on rate of motion towards the spot (ie: "forward and left for 10.....5...4..3.2.1..steady forward and left"). Works really well.
In my opinion, long lining is not an option for any rescue service. The patient is exposed to the environment beneath the helicopter far too long. Hypothermia, shock, fear, treatment delays are just some of the patient concerns. Danger for those on the line and for those in the helicopter is increased (not as likely to pickle a live load). Since the load must be relocated by moving the helicopter, a guide line is not possible thereby increasing danger of swing, spin, instability, etc.
Our mirrors were removed due to cost...some weren't taking care of them properly. Very bad decision, methinks.
As far as training, number one knowing machine and limitations, number two is mountain flying training (recommend Canadian Helicopters...v good course), then knowing area of responsibility and practicing the sequence regularly to make sure you know it instinctively.
There's so much more to talk about. Hope that's what you were looking for.
It is dangerous, challenging, diverse, and rewarding. I believe the ideal pilot for this will have plenty experience in Heli-ski, longlining, IFR ops and on-scene EMS. The machine needs a HOGE above the expected rescue altitude, with capacity for the victim(s) and fuel to make the hospital. Also, the helicopter should be able to handle strong wind from any quadrant.
We use a 255' hoist. Ideally we hoist between 35 and 50 feet, but sometimes trees and terrain dictate a higher hoist. If the trees are more than 255', we hoist our rescuers down 255' then they rappel off the hook to the ground. The hoist operator tells us where the site is with reference to the helicopter using arbitrary units that are based on rate of motion towards the spot (ie: "forward and left for 10.....5...4..3.2.1..steady forward and left"). Works really well.
In my opinion, long lining is not an option for any rescue service. The patient is exposed to the environment beneath the helicopter far too long. Hypothermia, shock, fear, treatment delays are just some of the patient concerns. Danger for those on the line and for those in the helicopter is increased (not as likely to pickle a live load). Since the load must be relocated by moving the helicopter, a guide line is not possible thereby increasing danger of swing, spin, instability, etc.
Our mirrors were removed due to cost...some weren't taking care of them properly. Very bad decision, methinks.
As far as training, number one knowing machine and limitations, number two is mountain flying training (recommend Canadian Helicopters...v good course), then knowing area of responsibility and practicing the sequence regularly to make sure you know it instinctively.
There's so much more to talk about. Hope that's what you were looking for.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Sunrise, Fl. U.S.A.
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The hoist operator tells us where the site is with reference to the helicopter using arbitrary units that are based on rate of motion towards the spot (ie: "forward and left for 10.....5...4..3.2.1..steady forward and left"). Works really well.
Someone assist me, as I remember some of my H-3 Bretheren aircrewmen telling me they have a stick by the door for the hoist operator in which he can give limited cyclic commands over what the pilot holds to position the bird for hoisting, easing that situation itself somewhat.
Nick? Lu ?
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: AB, Canada
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The stick by the door isn't uncommon in larger helicopters with some sort of auto hover capability. The problem in a rescue situation is when it's used, you have one man in the back moving the helicopter with one hand, operating the hoist with another, holding the cable with his third hand and securing himself with his fourth. Meanwhile you have two pilots in the cockpit discussing where to have supper.
It works so much better if the pilots fly and the hoist operator hoists.
There are situations where the stick is useful, but not in mountain rescue in general. Overwater rescues with little spatial reference for the pilots is one great area for the hover trim stick.
It works so much better if the pilots fly and the hoist operator hoists.
There are situations where the stick is useful, but not in mountain rescue in general. Overwater rescues with little spatial reference for the pilots is one great area for the hover trim stick.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You mentioned attaching a rappelling rope to the hoist hook, without trying to offend, I would suggest this is a habit you should re consider. The company I work for in Oz used to do this, as did several others, until we attended a Breeze Hoist Users conference in the US several years ago. Breeze informed us that this habit can cause shock loading of the cable, and as a result the strength of the hoist cable is compromised. I recal there was an incident a number of years ago in Isreal where some one was killed after the cable broke. We ceased this habit as a result. Without telling you how to do your job, I would suggest a call to Breeze asking for Mike Mitchell might be advised.
Safe hoisting!
Safe hoisting!
Driptray,
Fully agree, you'll find that Breeze have issued an alert bulletin, (I've got a copy at work) highlighting NOT to rappel off a hoist cable.
Heedm,
I recall the back seat stick (10% authority?) would only operate when auto hover engaged, usually using Doppler reference. OGE hovers in the high country wouldn't allow auto hover, hence a dead issue, surely? Although I quite agree that the back seat should winch, & the drivers drive...
Tecpilot, I'd be interested in any contact details for the equipment that you use for fixed line ops. We operate in the snow with a BK117, and sometimes get called for SAR, but pick ups are often a problem. Most times we finish up dropping off a ground crew who walk in, then spend another couple of hours walking out with the survivor, unless we can hover close enough to pick up the team. Could be a time saving option that we haven't considered if you have details. TIA.
Fully agree, you'll find that Breeze have issued an alert bulletin, (I've got a copy at work) highlighting NOT to rappel off a hoist cable.
Heedm,
I recall the back seat stick (10% authority?) would only operate when auto hover engaged, usually using Doppler reference. OGE hovers in the high country wouldn't allow auto hover, hence a dead issue, surely? Although I quite agree that the back seat should winch, & the drivers drive...
Tecpilot, I'd be interested in any contact details for the equipment that you use for fixed line ops. We operate in the snow with a BK117, and sometimes get called for SAR, but pick ups are often a problem. Most times we finish up dropping off a ground crew who walk in, then spend another couple of hours walking out with the survivor, unless we can hover close enough to pick up the team. Could be a time saving option that we haven't considered if you have details. TIA.
Avoid imitations
I certainly agree that the remote hover trim is difficult for the winch op to handle, they already have a high workload. The RHT device on the S-76 is not the easiest to use.
On the SAR unit I used to fly for, we sometimes let the winch operators practice RHT wet drums at their request for training. Usually, once they had done enough (or when we got short of fuel
!) we used to take back control to pick up the drum using their patter! We learned a lot of new swear words during this training..... enough said!
On the SAR unit I used to fly for, we sometimes let the winch operators practice RHT wet drums at their request for training. Usually, once they had done enough (or when we got short of fuel
!) we used to take back control to pick up the drum using their patter! We learned a lot of new swear words during this training..... enough said!
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: AB, Canada
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Driptray and John Eacott,
Thanks for the heads up. I will investigate this. It is a capability we have but don't use too often. In fact we train for it much more often than actually use it.
Our hoist is rated for a 600lb load in high speed and a 1800lb load in slow (cargo) mode. Cable peel out should happen at 1800lb. Anyone know if these are similiar numbers to the hoist that issued the bulletin?
Also, if anyone can provide any details on that Israeli incident, it would be much appreciated.
Thanks.
Thanks for the heads up. I will investigate this. It is a capability we have but don't use too often. In fact we train for it much more often than actually use it.
Our hoist is rated for a 600lb load in high speed and a 1800lb load in slow (cargo) mode. Cable peel out should happen at 1800lb. Anyone know if these are similiar numbers to the hoist that issued the bulletin?
Also, if anyone can provide any details on that Israeli incident, it would be much appreciated.
Thanks.
As said in my opinion hoist operations are more variabel and easier compared to fixed line.
But the advantages of fixed line are the following: the whole fixed line stuff is easy to transport in a single small bag and the normal 3 man crew (of course well trained) is any time ready to activate the system. That means for example from a car crash site if necessary direct to mountain or rooftop rescue. The system is much cheaper than a hoist. Costs depends on the number of rescue missions. Heedm is part time right. Transfer time should be not to long. But that's a question of the operation area, conditions and patient. Have made an extraction of a patient localized by a ground unit 4 weeks ago on a freezing day. After the 20 minutes we needed, the online rescuer and an observer standing on the BK's skid, checked themselves for frost bites. We have no negative experiences with spinning (line lenght). "Load" swinging is first hand a question of crew skills. But depends on the wind and line lenght. Have said "crew" because CRM is really decisive, especially communications. A single rescuer on the line isn't so good. On the transfer he will be turned backside forward and couldn`t see the insertion site and obstacles. Unfortunately sometimes there is no other way. With two or three rescuers it's much better. Best variant i think, is the patient in the rescue bag between two rescuers. An electrically heated and pilot controlled mirror is absolutely recommended! Please dont`try such missions on the end of the helicopters performance. A good amount of available engine power makes all guys feels better. To John Eacott i will try to collect some pictures and words in the next days and email you.
But the advantages of fixed line are the following: the whole fixed line stuff is easy to transport in a single small bag and the normal 3 man crew (of course well trained) is any time ready to activate the system. That means for example from a car crash site if necessary direct to mountain or rooftop rescue. The system is much cheaper than a hoist. Costs depends on the number of rescue missions. Heedm is part time right. Transfer time should be not to long. But that's a question of the operation area, conditions and patient. Have made an extraction of a patient localized by a ground unit 4 weeks ago on a freezing day. After the 20 minutes we needed, the online rescuer and an observer standing on the BK's skid, checked themselves for frost bites. We have no negative experiences with spinning (line lenght). "Load" swinging is first hand a question of crew skills. But depends on the wind and line lenght. Have said "crew" because CRM is really decisive, especially communications. A single rescuer on the line isn't so good. On the transfer he will be turned backside forward and couldn`t see the insertion site and obstacles. Unfortunately sometimes there is no other way. With two or three rescuers it's much better. Best variant i think, is the patient in the rescue bag between two rescuers. An electrically heated and pilot controlled mirror is absolutely recommended! Please dont`try such missions on the end of the helicopters performance. A good amount of available engine power makes all guys feels better. To John Eacott i will try to collect some pictures and words in the next days and email you.
I have never used a fixed line but every time I see it performed on the news the hairs on the back of my neck rise as I envisage the dilema that the pilot would face should an engine fail and he has to jettison the line to complete his flyaway. I have always used a hoist and believe that there is no other safe way. The safety of the winchman is paramount and we took care to ensure that the winchman was always at a safe height should the cable break or have to be cut due to an engine failure. During mountain ops we would always brief an escape route and responsibilty for cable cutting should an engine fail. It is safer to have the winch op cut the cable at a suitable time as the pilot concentrates on flying the escape route.
The Aux hover trim in the Seaking was only used over water and came into its own on still nights when trying to winch to a small target. It had 10% authority but could be given full authority if certain ccbs were pulled!! If this was done quietly it could really surprise the winch op as he accelerated thru' 60kts!!
Safe Flying
HF
The Aux hover trim in the Seaking was only used over water and came into its own on still nights when trying to winch to a small target. It had 10% authority but could be given full authority if certain ccbs were pulled!! If this was done quietly it could really surprise the winch op as he accelerated thru' 60kts!!
Safe Flying
HF
