Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Sikorsky S-76: Ask Nick Lappos

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Sikorsky S-76: Ask Nick Lappos

Old 20th Feb 2003, 09:44
  #281 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which model has the steps which unfold automatically as the oleo is depressed?
Bright-Ling is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2003, 21:12
  #282 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,366
Received 203 Likes on 92 Posts
The same model that has the bar fridge door pop open as the gear flipper door pops shut.
Ascend Charlie is online now  
Old 21st Feb 2003, 13:52
  #283 (permalink)  
cpt
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: 1500' AMSL
Age: 67
Posts: 412
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
S76 A++ engines match in flight.

One of our company's training captain insists we should match the fuel flow in cruise flight on our S76 A++, but the reasons he gives seems to be rather vague.
My common sense tells me to match the torques instead, and I would like to know others "76" fliers ideas and experience in that matter.
Thanks in advance!!!!
CPT
cpt is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2003, 14:25
  #284 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: canada
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi CPT!

I don't recall any RFM limitation on this matter. Sounds more like an operational procedure than anything else..... i.e managing your fuel over the water to the rigs, maybe????

Any other info you can give.......reasoning from your training guy???

D.K
donut king is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2003, 14:58
  #285 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southwest England
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

I thought you match on N1 on the Arriel 1S1. Matching fuel flow may give a torque split and difference in N1 due to engine condition.
tiebolt puller is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2003, 17:22
  #286 (permalink)  
cpt
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: 1500' AMSL
Age: 67
Posts: 412
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes, I personnally believe that N1, T5, and fuel flow are significant of engine condition and providing they remain within their limitations, they can be mismatched.
In an another hand I have the feeling that the torques resulting from these figures reflect the output power to the gear box and therefore better deserve to be equally balanced.
Our training captain is indeed considering fuel managment first, but the split in fuel cunsumption is never that critical even on long sectors...
This issue is probably not essential since nothing about is in the flight manual, that's also why it is interresting to know others "S76 folks" opinions.
cpt is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2003, 17:44
  #287 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: home and abroad
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the A+ we match torques when we need the power, match N1s when it's hot and we need the power, and match FF in the cruise as far as it's practical.
If either match gives a large split in another parameter, we try and keep the split to something comfortable and have it checked after the flight.

We have no hard guidance on this, though.
S76Heavy is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2003, 18:52
  #288 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: One Mile High
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I tend to agree with S76 Heavy. When operating near a limit match the engines in the parameter closest to its limit. In cruise I tend to match N1s, but don't see anything wrong with matching fuel flow. If matching engines in one parameter creates a significant split in another have maintenance check it out.

-Stan-
slgrossman is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2003, 01:11
  #289 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've never tried matching fuel flow, because it just doesn't seem that important. It's never that different in the aircraft I've flown anyway. I match torques in the winter, because that's the first limit I'll hit. In the summer, I match N1's, because that will be the first limit when it's hot. Most of the pilots I know tend to either match torques, or sometimes N1. I've never heard of anyone trying to match fuel flow.
GLSNightPilot is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2003, 17:26
  #290 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Iceland
Age: 58
Posts: 814
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Don´t you S-76 guy´s have a limit on allowed torque split.
Its 4% in my B-222U.
Aesir is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2003, 05:51
  #291 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I normally match N1's... (depending on size of the the Tq split)

You can always select fuel X-feed if/should you wish to fix the fuel imbalance
clearance is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2003, 06:12
  #292 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Oz
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Snoop

I'm with you clearance
trimpot is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2003, 10:44
  #293 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SE ASIA
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a great deal of time on the A++ and have worked for 3 companies flying them. We always matched what ever would reach limits first at take off and matched torques during cruise.

I Agree with DK that there is really no reason for matching Fuel Flows. Given the reliabilty levels ( or lack there of ) of the Fuel Flow Indicators I see Very Little Merit In Teaching Line Guys To Match Them!

I guess at the end of the day we operate to what the company that pays our cheque wants us to do.
RoamingCyclic is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2003, 11:43
  #294 (permalink)  
rwm
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: canada
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As an engine gets tired, it starts to burn more fuel, and more fuel means more ITT, EGT,ect. Also if your compressor starts to wear out, you start turning N1 faster to make up for loss of efficiency. Now if you start matching fuel flow on a miss matched airframe, you may end up worsening the condition of the engines. Now how exactly is the maintainers supose to fix a miss matched fuel flow? If you came and told me that your fuel flow was out, first thing I'd ask is what is your N1 and ITT.
rwm is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2003, 13:47
  #295 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Age: 73
Posts: 338
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
cpt:
Look in the Limitations section of the Flight Manual. You'll find limits for N1, Q and ITT but nothing, I recall, on Fuel Flow!
Balancing power input to the MGB is the most important parameter for airframe life. Matching N1 or ITT close to one engine limiting on those parameters may override this.
idle stop is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2003, 20:50
  #296 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,366
Received 203 Likes on 92 Posts
In the B model with the PT6 and Fadec, we do not have to diddle with the trim switches, as the computer matches the chosen parameter for us.

And the choice is: Match Torque (to keep the input power to the gearbox balanced) or
Match T5.

No mention of N1 or fuel flow.

I can't see why you would attempt to match fuel flow. Even in a guzzler like the PT6 there is only a difference of 20 lb per hour at 75% Tq and 145 Kt.And the needle on the fuel flow gauge flickers more than 20lb anyway.
Ascend Charlie is online now  
Old 25th Feb 2003, 21:40
  #297 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Uk / West Africa
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flying the straight C with the 1S1's it was company procedure to match N1's, which 95% of the time was the primary limiting factor, and simply accept the slight indifferance in fuel flow readings. The difference as A Charlie stated is really not likely to be significant...

Don't know how your regs differ over there Clearance but here in the UK we were prohibited from X-feeding during Public Transport ops except in the case of an emergency...
engineoff is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2003, 16:19
  #298 (permalink)  
cpt
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: 1500' AMSL
Age: 67
Posts: 412
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks for all these posts !!! very interesting and technically enriching.
In our company too, we cannot balance fuel quantities in crossfeeding, and this procedure must be considered as an emergency procedure ( the flight manual also agrees with this, if I remember well).
cpt is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2003, 09:27
  #299 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
engineoff -
Don't know how your regs differ over there Clearance but here in the UK we were prohibited from X-feeding during Public Transport ops except in the case of an emergency...
As per As per Flight Manual - Part 1 Section 1,
Fuel crossfeed operation is prohibited in flight except in strict accordance with the emergency procedure (page 3-2C).

Fuel crossfeed operations with vent line check valves (kit P / N 76070-30029-011) installed limited to:

Cat "A" - Emergency flight only
Cat "B" - Cruising flight only

We operate to Cat B.

Cheers
Clearance
clearance is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2003, 02:08
  #300 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Gold Coast, Queensland
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Clearance

Good to see you are still reading your flight manual! Must be all that good training you had!
Nigel Osborn is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.