Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Legislative Combat Over Marine One

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Legislative Combat Over Marine One

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Apr 2005, 17:56
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Connecticut.
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking Legislative Combat Over Marine One

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/07/ny.../07copter.html

Go Get 'Em Dodd! Your thoughts and Ideas after reading?


Legislative Combat Over the President's Copters
By RAYMOND HERNANDEZ

Published: April 7, 2005

WASHINGTON, April 6 - A border dispute between Connecticut and New York erupted on the floor of the Senate on Wednesday afternoon and brought business in the chamber to a sudden halt.

The fight - which had been brewing for months - centered on the Pentagon's decision to hire an international group led by Lockheed Martin to build the next fleet of presidential helicopters.

Advertisement

That decision pleased New York's Congressional delegation, primarily because some of the work will be done at a new Lockheed plant in upstate New York. But it outraged members of Connecticut's Congressional delegation, who wanted Sikorsky Aircraft, a Connecticut-based company, to continue building the White House's helicopters, as it has since the Eisenhower era.

The matter seemed to be settled until Wednesday, when Senator Christopher J. Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat, tried introducing a measure that would likely have undermined the deal between the Pentagon and Lockheed. Unknown to his colleagues from New York - or so they say - Mr. Dodd offered the measure in the form of an amendment to a bill to authorize rules governing the State Department.

But before a vote on the Dodd amendment could take place, word quickly got back to his New York colleagues, Charles E. Schumer and Hillary Rodham Clinton, who rushed to the Senate floor to stop Mr. Dodd.

The two New York senators accused Mr. Dodd of, in effect, trying to pull a fast one and threatened to use procedural maneuvers to tie up the larger State Department bill unless Mr. Dodd withdrew his amendment.

"I will hold up this bill," Mr. Schumer said on the floor. "It was a sneak attack."

But Mr. Dodd refused to yield, forcing Senate leaders to withdraw the State Department bill.

The fireworks continued after the floor debate, with Senator Clinton cornering Mr. Dodd, wagging her finger at him and scolding him for being "naughty," according to one official who witnessed the encounter.

"This is a huge deal to our state," Mrs. Clinton said later, noting that the project would bring up to 700 jobs to the Binghamton area. "We won this contract fair and square."

The helicopter fleet, which will be ready in 2009, will be built by Lockheed and AgustaWestland, a British-Italian venture.

The amendment that Mr. Dodd offered would require any foreign company involved in building the presidential helicopters to declare that it would not do business with any state that sponsors terrorism.

Mr. Dodd's office noted that AgustaWestland was one of the companies listed as having attended an air show in Iran, though the senator's office said it was not accusing the company of doing business with Iran.

"My amendment is simple," Mr. Dodd said when he presented the measure on the floor. "It says that foreign companies involved in developing the president's Marine One helicopter must pledge in writing that they will not conduct business with state sponsors of terrorism."

"The principle is clear," he continued, "and hardly controversial."
Mikester540 is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2005, 09:23
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a provider of arms to several of the countries Mr Dodds is thinking about in the past (Allegedly!), does this mean the USA would need to put in writing it won't provide arms anymore before they can build their own aircraft
magbreak is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2005, 04:15
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Come on now, Senator Dodd only wants FOREIGN countries to stop helping 'terrorists', he wouldn't limit USA actions!
LowNr is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2005, 05:08
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: daworld
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
magbreak and LowNR, you took the words out of my mouth!!
noooby is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2005, 14:00
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry Senator For Sale!!

http://www.nypost.com/news/regionalnews/44177.htm
av8rbpm is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2005, 14:07
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: daworld
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Pigeon one to Pigeon two. I have reason to believe there is a cat amongst us somehwere!!

Nice link av8rbpm
noooby is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.