Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Gazelle: Flying, operating, buying

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Gazelle: Flying, operating, buying

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Dec 2016, 09:20
  #861 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: England
Posts: 1,459
Received 34 Likes on 20 Posts
The section of the notes on jack stall was very interesting. The reference to large cyclic inputs during the recovery might explain how an army Gazelle got into an irrecoverable dive that ended up with three dead and two injured. For years I've wondered why the pilot would make large cyclic movements and maybe this is a clue.
ericferret is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2016, 10:04
  #862 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,247
Received 330 Likes on 183 Posts
When the Rotor RPM fall down, the Fenestron RPM fall down at the same ratio, but the poweron pedal fall down faster....it's fenestron effect
Not unique to fenestrons - the point is that although the TR rpm decays linearly with the Nr decay, the actual thrust decay is following a 'square law'.
212man is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2016, 16:21
  #863 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,321
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Eric - the notes rather over-egg the jackstall recovery - you have to pull quite hard to get it into jackstall and then only a slight relaxation of that pull is required to let it recover.

You have to keep pulling hard to keep it in jackstall which is a very un-natural thing to do.

The danger is getting it in a right hand turn, especially at low level as it rolls you further right as it enters jackstall.

We used to demonstrate entry and recovery either in a left hand turn at IPS or in a dive to VL at MPS.

212 - agreed, but that funny (peculiar not ha ha) loss of 'lip-lift' can give you a slightly more binary effect as Nr decays.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2016, 00:32
  #864 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
One of the joys of being the Theatre Ground Runner (or MTP if you like) was having to test the Jack stall entry and recovery characteristics on every Gazelle MR Handling Check. Suffice to say, having got several dozen under my belt, it rarely surprised me but I also discovered many line pilots were often surprised and unaware of the correct technique. Just like Fenestron Stall in fact, which is simply a French phrase meaning "Lead-Footed".
Two's in is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2016, 05:57
  #865 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,321
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Fenestron Stall in fact, which is simply a French phrase meaning "Lead-Footed".
Excellent, I'll pass that one on to my Gazelle chums.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2016, 23:37
  #866 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Thaïland
Age: 67
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not only GZL, lot of accident occurs with the EC 130 for same raison : lack of instruction about the fenestron and big tail effect crosswind. specially in final approach.
BOBAKAT is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2016, 10:49
  #867 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK - The SD
Posts: 459
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Seem to remember in the 'notes' - avoid winds from the right/turning left at low speed?
Current Bell I operate-avoid low speed turns right/wind from the left.....possible LTE.
serf is offline  
Old 2nd May 2017, 16:58
  #868 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Here
Posts: 1,874
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Bringing this back to the original (17 year old!) thread.

Considering buying a 100% civil machine on the N register - but price is $450K. Nearly all components have 1000hrs or more remaining and it's in great condition.

So...?
Sam Rutherford is offline  
Old 2nd May 2017, 18:22
  #869 (permalink)  
hueyracer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Too expensive from my experience....


Some of the old military ones go for 100-150k....
 
Old 3rd May 2017, 04:36
  #870 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Here
Posts: 1,874
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Understood, but there is a very big difference in usability and value between the ex-mil machines and the 100% civil versions.
Sam Rutherford is offline  
Old 3rd May 2017, 05:31
  #871 (permalink)  
hueyracer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I must admit-never flew either of them.....


Whats the difference?
Just asking out of curiosity....
 
Old 3rd May 2017, 05:34
  #872 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Here
Posts: 1,874
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Main one is legal use - fully legal, even IFR (dependent fit) for the civil version. Permit to fly only for the ex-mil versions.

The 'secondary' is that the civilian ones tend to have had an easier life, much fewer hours etc.
Sam Rutherford is offline  
Old 3rd May 2017, 06:12
  #873 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Escrick York england
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sam huey

I think you will find that the civil gazelle and the military gazelle are similar prices. And Huey the prices you mentioned are possiblby 20 years old you proberbly would double that in the uk
That's if you could find a flying ex mil gazelle for sale in the uk I know companies with waiting lists for gazelles as they are very sort after steve
md 600 driver is offline  
Old 3rd May 2017, 06:40
  #874 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Escrick York england
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sam Rutherford
Bringing this back to the original (17 year old!) thread.

Considering buying a 100% civil machine on the N register - but price is $450K. Nearly all components have 1000hrs or more remaining and it's in great condition.

So...?
Go for it fantastic helicopter and very contrary to what the gazelle detractors say if you need to know about gazelles ask a gazelle owner for feed back on prices and serviceability. Not a dreamer
md 600 driver is offline  
Old 3rd May 2017, 07:14
  #875 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Here
Posts: 1,874
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have almost 1500h on gazelle, so that's why I'm interested. Just trying to make the price tag fit an almost 50 year old machine...
Sam Rutherford is offline  
Old 3rd May 2017, 10:55
  #876 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 798
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CRAB - my instructor on QHI course decided to do the demo in a 60 deg RIGHT hand turn - saw Newport past over my head as we flipped all the way under. Asked for an instructor change!
oldbeefer is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2019, 10:31
  #877 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Guys,

Does anybody have any experience of the UK Gazelle AH1, with the upward pointing exhaust, as shown below?


Were there any drains in place to prevent the engine from filling with water in the case of shutting down in the rain?

Many thanks,
CRAN
CRAN is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2019, 10:34
  #878 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Here
Posts: 1,874
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No, we kept goldfish in ours - they loved the warm water...

I'll get my coat!
Sam Rutherford is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2019, 10:36
  #879 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Here
Posts: 1,874
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ah, just seen it's a bootneck machine - don't know what they kept in theirs - presumably saltwater though.

Okay, really must do something else now!
Sam Rutherford is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2019, 10:55
  #880 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Spain
Age: 78
Posts: 65
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
The Army Gazelle fleet included the aircraft for the Royal Marines (3 Brigade Air Squadron as was).

The RM Gazelles had SAS fitted presumably for reduced workload on over water ops.

.
Crab, I was on Gazelle Conversion Course No 7, in 1974, as a Royal Marine, and during the 3 years that I flew the Gazelle we never had SAS fitted. We also did a deployment to the USA on HMS Hermes, (or was it Bulwark?) the following year, 1975, and night deck landings mid-Atlantic were very interesting in a machine without stabilisation - you almost didn't dare blink until you were on finals!

Sounds like it was a good bit of kit for a single engined helicopter.
Attila is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.