PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Questions (https://www.pprune.org/questions-67/)
-   -   B-777(why no winglets?) (https://www.pprune.org/questions/129378-b-777-why-no-winglets.html)

TwinDarts 7th May 2004 08:00

B-777(why no winglets?)
 
Why do wings on the B-777 not have winglets on them? It seems strange considering that most modern day airliners have them.....

5150 7th May 2004 08:55

Covered a hundred times before!

Cos it's a newly designed wing that doesn't require them, ie it's efficient without them.

Presumably you've been looking at a 744 or MD-11, well they're just new variations of an old design, therefore bung a winglet on either end to make something more efficient than it used to be.

If you want a technical answer, do a search.....

swh 7th May 2004 09:30

Have a look here

chaulks 7th May 2004 20:33

another cave dweller!

MD11Flyer 7th May 2004 21:57

Actually studying Aerospace Engineering, winglets don't do exactly what they say they do. If anything, the raked winglets on the 767-400 and 777-300ER reduce drag and increase range.

B737NG 8th May 2004 12:38

No need effective enough to save gas and reduce voretex.

NG

MD11Flyer 8th May 2004 17:55

But it is a good way of convincing those airline suckers to pay big bucks to install them. If anything its a good way to advertise your airline for your passengers. There is some turbulence they will look outside worried only to be calmed by staring at the logo of the airline they are flying on :E

5150 9th May 2004 09:17

MD11

That can work the other way too!

A constant reminder never to fly that airline again!

PaperTiger 9th May 2004 16:35

The 777 wing was also designed to fold so as to fit in with existing airports' infrastructure. In the event, no airline chose this option, as it has proved to be unnecessary. Whether folding would have been practical with winglets or not I can't say. Someone ?

And I see Continental intends to wingletify their 757s. Be interesting to see if that affects the gnarly vortices one way or the other.

MD11Flyer 9th May 2004 16:53

5150,

LOL you're right and most of the time its reminding them not to fly with that airline again. :)

chippy63 12th May 2004 07:49

A bit off thread, but I was in Nairobi recently and saw some Kenya Airways 737's with winglets: they were -700's, but their registration letters were in the same sequence the other, un-wingletted KQ 737's, so presumably a retrofit.
The winglets seemed to be at least 2 metres long and seemed quite out of proportion to the size of the aircraft.
Would appreciate any replies as to the benefits of "outsize" winglets. Also, I understand that the benefit of winglets is mainly experienced in the cruise, so how cost-effective are they for short haul operations?

Tallbloke 19th May 2004 07:37

The original question was why does the 777 have no winglets. I don't buy the "Boeing made a super duper wing" theory..why does every new design aircraft have winglets (even Boeing offerings) and the 777 does not?


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:53.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.