Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Performance wise which is best B737,B757 or A320,A321

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Performance wise which is best B737,B757 or A320,A321

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Sep 2002, 15:03
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Hang on, I'll check my roster...
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just cos you didntlike the way it was going...
Spearing Britney is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2002, 19:16
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Slightly off topic, but from a Cabin Crew point of view, the 757 is far nicer to work on than ANY of the Airbus family. Things in the right place, and so on.

However, opportunities to fly the 757 are getting less and less, but A321 more and more.
Jennie Blond is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2002, 09:56
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From an ATC side of things I'd say the newest B737's. The 757's maybe quick in the cruise but the 737-700/800 aren't far off the pace, and the 73's seem to expedite at ANY level fantastically and instantly. As for the 757-300, A320, and A321, i don't think they will ever know 'expedite' once above FL250, they hardly even know 'climb'. I don't know what the max. cruise levels are for each, but invaribly the B737's request higher than any of the rest on all days, but also understand this is economy from time to time.
5milesbaby is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2002, 16:50
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: south england
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From my username, you can no doubt work out which type I currently fly. I personally think that although the airbus is a little underpowered compared to the boeing, it is a lovely machine to fly.

But on the other hand, I can't wait to have the opportunity to get a boeing on my licence.

What I can't stand is this point of view you get from some people IF IT AIN'T BOEING I AIN'T GOING or vice versa. It seems a little narrow minded. As they both have their selling points.
gatbusdriver is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2002, 15:54
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Boeings are my choice performance wise. The 320 & 321 types are dogs performance wise in the takeoff and climb sector. They are also slow to descend due to the very high idle thrust required to provide a reasonable spool up time in flight The 319 does have adequate performance.
Tree is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2002, 14:45
  #26 (permalink)  

Keeping Danny in Sandwiches
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: UK
Age: 76
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You do wonder if a bit more fuel capacity on the 757 would rejuvenate the aircraft. With a max RTOW of 115.6 tonnes another 6 to 8 tonnes of extra fuel would make it a lovely "long and thin" aircraft, ideal for 180 pax. from the UK to the Caribbean. Boeing seem to have given up on the type.
sky9 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.