F/O Incapacitated during approach - Mayday?
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
F/O Incapacitated during approach - Mayday?
With acknowledgement to Avherald
Hmmm.....Mayday? Maybe more effective to tell ATC to get a doctor/ambulance to the aircraft immediately on parking, and why?
A Mayday call can create unnecessary distractions, in some circumstances. In this case there was only one priority, and that's to get treatment started on the F/O. Apart from him, it's arguable that there was no immediate threat to life.
A Volaris Airbus A321-200, registration XA-VLV performing flight Y4-737 from Guadalajara to Mexico City (Mexico), was on final approach to Mexico City's runway 05R when the first officer fainted. The captain declared Mayday and continued the approach for a safe landing on runway 05R.
A Mayday call can create unnecessary distractions, in some circumstances. In this case there was only one priority, and that's to get treatment started on the F/O. Apart from him, it's arguable that there was no immediate threat to life.
Hmmm.....Mayday? Maybe more effective to tell ATC to get a doctor/ambulance to the aircraft immediately on parking, and why?
A Mayday call can create unnecessary distractions, in some circumstances. In this case there was only one priority, and that's to get treatment started on the F/O. Apart from him, it's arguable that there was no immediate threat to life.
A Mayday call can create unnecessary distractions, in some circumstances. In this case there was only one priority, and that's to get treatment started on the F/O. Apart from him, it's arguable that there was no immediate threat to life.
Lets say it was you, going incapacitated on final.........
What would you want your f/o tell atc, "its all-right" type of thing?
I would hope you (all) call the shots as needed, and appropriate!
TP
Hmmm.....Mayday? Maybe more effective to tell ATC to get a doctor/ambulance to the aircraft immediately on parking, and why?
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IRS NAV ONLY
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Think of it this way, you lose the entire redundancy in the flight deck. Would you be happy to do a go-around with single engine or single hydraulic system operating, just because somebody did a very slow line-up or ATC managed the runway operations a bit less than optimal? My guess would be no, so why accept it when you're down to one pilot?
Mayday call will most likely mean whoever's in front of you will go around and nobody else is going to enter the runway before you land. Get it on the ground and sort it there, cancel the mayday if you feel it's no longer warranted.
Definitely better than flying single pilot go-around and then taking 15 minutes around a busy airspace to get positioned for another approach, while having to notify cabin crew etc. about what is going on.
Mayday call will most likely mean whoever's in front of you will go around and nobody else is going to enter the runway before you land. Get it on the ground and sort it there, cancel the mayday if you feel it's no longer warranted.
Definitely better than flying single pilot go-around and then taking 15 minutes around a busy airspace to get positioned for another approach, while having to notify cabin crew etc. about what is going on.
If I called a Mayday it would be followed by what the problem was and what I wanted.
Apart from the above how do you know he's "fainted"? Can you tell by glancing at him that he hasn't had a heart attack or a stroke, or is about to launch into a fit? That's a call beyond a Pilot's pay-grade. It's a Mayday and land for medical assistance asap imho.
For the mayday doubters, turn the scenario around and have the Capt incapacitated on finals - what call does the FO then make?
QED I think.
For the mayday doubters, turn the scenario around and have the Capt incapacitated on finals - what call does the FO then make?
QED I think.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, thanks to all. I posted this as a question in "Questions", to see what the consensus would be.
Overwhelmingly, the Mayday was the right action, for a number of persuasive reasons, provided in the posts above.
Overwhelmingly, the Mayday was the right action, for a number of persuasive reasons, provided in the posts above.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Either the back of a sim, or wherever Crewing send me.
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I posted this as a question in "Questions"
Hmmm.....Mayday?
Then followed by
Maybe more effective to tell ATC to get a doctor/ambulance to the aircraft immediately on parking, and why?
If you are going to ask a question, don't make it ambiguous.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unambiguously I’ll suggest declaring an emergency was a good call. The initial benefit should be extra scrutiny on approach and possible help on a go-around by ATC, simpler clearances, easier taxiing possibly with a “Follow Me”, a possible warning to ground handlers to be careful and getting the blue lights rolling without delay. Let’s also bear in mind that Mexico City is not the easiest airport to fly into.
PM
PM
Yes of course it’s a MAYDAY it is a failure of a critical system, AND it is potentially a human life.
You want maximum assistance, MAYDAY comes from the French m’aidez (sp?) = help me. You want to land ASAP, you don’t want ATC to vector you round the houses, or tell you to break off the approach, or go-around, and once on the ground you want to taxi in and get to a gate ASAP, so you can get some medical help.
You want maximum assistance, MAYDAY comes from the French m’aidez (sp?) = help me. You want to land ASAP, you don’t want ATC to vector you round the houses, or tell you to break off the approach, or go-around, and once on the ground you want to taxi in and get to a gate ASAP, so you can get some medical help.