Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Single Rwy Dest diversion to Alt. single Rwy.

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Single Rwy Dest diversion to Alt. single Rwy.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Feb 2017, 23:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: 174.79*E
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Single Rwy Dest diversion to Alt. single Rwy.

Would request comment on a scenario that was discussed.
On arriving at a destination with a SINGLE runway, with an alternate ALSO with a SINGLE runway. Would you as a PIC divert to an alternate when divert fuel was reached or would you work on the fact that by hanging around you could land due to unforseen delays to the approach but would also use some of the divert fuel. Bearing in mind that both destination and alternate has single runways and reserve fuel for the alternate is 30 mins.
C152R is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2017, 01:44
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: 174.79*E
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having considered both sides of the argument. I would have pre planned my latest options to divert either based on time or fuel required to alternate. If the wx at the alternate was good I would divert. I am covered legally. Now If the single runway at the alternate became blocked and there were no other alternatives. I would declare a fuel emergency and if necessary if the taxiway was long enough I would land on it.
C152R is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2017, 08:38
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now If the single runway at the alternate became blocked and there were no other alternatives. I would declare a fuel emergency and if necessary if the taxiway was long enough I would land on it.

I was thinking exactly the same ref' the taxiway. A suitable strip of tarmac in an emergency is a suitable strip of tarmac. However, why not apply the same thinking at destination? If Wx is OK and there is an EAT which dips into diversion fuel, but not the last 30mins, and ATC are aware of your status then why not wait. An emergency at destination, or an emergency at alt'n? The statisticians will tell us if there is a difference. It can be argued that waiting at destination will give you more fuel when the emergency happens than at alt'n, where you will arrive with only 30 mins.
Expanding the debate: you are in descent to destination passing FL150. You are arriving with RES Fuel. Wx is fine & at alt'n. The alt'n is beyond destination and requires an overfly. You are now alerted to a 10-15min delay. Decisions? One thought might be to remain FL150, reduce to min clean and proceed to a point midway between destination & alt'n. This could be a convenient point about 50nm from both airports. Luckily convenient. Decision time would be at that point having eaten up some of the EAT delay. You'd land at alt'n with >30mins or land at destination with <res. Some thought would be given to if you are now No.1 into either airport, i..e the runway is clear & open.
RAT 5 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.