Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Airbus Cargo smoke : the philosophy

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Airbus Cargo smoke : the philosophy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st May 2016, 06:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: international
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airbus Cargo smoke : the philosophy

ok here's an issue that's bothering me arising from lack of consensus in the training : On an A320 family if you have a cargo smoke alert and you activate the extinguishing agent , the smoke warning will remain because the smoke is now trapped in what becomes a tight-seal compartment and the extinguishing agent itself is perceived as 'smoke' by the detectors .
By this fact many instructors conclude that a fire cannot reignite . You have an extinguishing agent which 'inhibits' the potency of oxygen to sustain combustion within that tight-seal space . With this thought you really do not need to act immediately for the Red LAND ASAP . You can examine the possibility of continuing to your destination if its relatively close and occasionally have a flight attendant checking the floor above the affected compartment for any unusual heat .
I have my ideas and thoughts on this issue which I will not mention now .
I would like to know your approach and thoughts on this issue and more importantly how does your training department sees it
alexious85 is offline  
Old 1st May 2016, 07:18
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Around the world.
Age: 42
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airbus have a cabin which is meant to be fairly air tight with the outflow valve shut.

On an air test we had an air frame with a 6000' / min rate of climb of the cabin pressure when the packs were turned off.

I would want to get on the ground ASAP.
tom775257 is offline  
Old 1st May 2016, 07:42
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dorset UK
Age: 70
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Got to be "LAND ASAP". It could be Li batteries down there.
dixi188 is offline  
Old 1st May 2016, 08:34
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: international
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tom775 i have no clue what you mean ... i am speaking about the cargo holds and you speak about the cabin
alexious85 is offline  
Old 1st May 2016, 12:46
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IRS NAV ONLY
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Treat any cargo fire as LAND ASAP red and fly with Vmo/Mmo to the nearest airport. You can try to extinguish the cargo fire and solve any other problems on the way to the airport, but first priority is getting to the runway ASAP.

Unless you packed and loaded the cargo yourself, you can never know what it actually contains. If the cause are lithium batteries, nothing will help you but landing as soon as possible and getting as far away from the aircraft as possible.

Next time anybody suggest you that you can easily continue to the destination with the cargo fire extinguished, have them read the final report of UPS 744 crash in Dubai. That should change their opinion on the severity of cargo fire.
FlyingStone is offline  
Old 1st May 2016, 14:50
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: international
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Li batteries is my main concern as well . My approach is land ASAP .
alexious85 is offline  
Old 4th May 2016, 10:36
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,101
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
You just don't know what's happening down there, and once you do know it is probably too late.
AerocatS2A is offline  
Old 10th May 2016, 19:40
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Alexious, I think most would agree the attitude of such instructors appears a little cavalier. I get the logic but in a world of litigation and what ifs we simply do not take chances if a warning is there. Try to envisage an accident in which the investigation is trying to understand what made the PIC ignore a smoke warning. Airbus manuals are written by lawyers so you can be sure that nothing in there will help you in your defence.
Superpilot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.