Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

How come BA doesn't use Airbus aircraft for Longhaul?

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

How come BA doesn't use Airbus aircraft for Longhaul?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Mar 2002, 21:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post How come BA doesn't use Airbus aircraft for Longhaul?

Most European Carriers have at least some form of Airbus Aircraft for their Longhaul, and there is speculation that soon they will have all airbus fleets.. .. .However, BA seems to be an exception? Why so?. .I thought UK was an integral part of the Airbus Industrie?
shon7 is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2002, 03:17
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Camp X-Ray
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Probably because they didn't offer them at the right price, or the range/payload profile wasn't right for the routes BA had in mind, or because they want to continue playing Boeing and Airbus off against each other to get the best deal. Still, I live in hope of that elusive A330 deal. Also BA are privately owned, not state owned, so the fact that UK industry plays a large part in Airbus is irrelevant. As it happens UK industry plays in a large part in Boeing aircraft too.. . . . <small>[ 20 March 2002, 23:21: Message edited by: Hand Solo ]</small>
Hand Solo is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2002, 18:58
  #3 (permalink)  
747FOCAL
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

And Scarebuses are slow gas guzzlers compared to a 777 or a 747-400. They don't carry as much either. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="biggrin.gif" />
 
Old 23rd Mar 2002, 19:46
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: London
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I read a Business Traveller article some years ago that suggested that passengers tend to prefer Airbus for shorthaul aircraft, but Boeing for longhaul.... .. .Personally I'm surprised that they even notice what plane they're in.
eeper is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2002, 00:58
  #5 (permalink)  

Controversial, moi?
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,606
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Post

747focal. .. .I stand to be corrected but LHR - HKG I believe that on average the fuel burn is about 60 tonnes less in an A340 compared to a 747 - 400.
M.Mouse is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2002, 15:52
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

M Mouse,. .. .I wonder how that translates into fuel burn per seat, if the A340 has 250 seats, and the 400 has up to 390? These figures taken from Lufthansa's configurations as shown in their timetable.
chippy63 is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2002, 19:23
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Post

B747-400:10 tonnes an hour fuel burn. A340-300: 6 tonnes. 390 x 60% = 250ish. All depends on how many punters you expect to carry.
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2002, 21:16
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Yes, but that negates any cargo carriage.
Lucifer is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2002, 01:31
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Valley Where the Thames Runs Softly
Age: 77
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

I don't know the details (and we no longer have The Guvnor to advise us) but I am under the impression that there is more to choosing aircraft than the day-to-day economics. Mainly there is the sticker price, and you then have to factor in the credit terms, spares deals, guaranteed buybacks, part exchanges, and other details that we should not talk about (!) Arthur Daley would be quite at home in the airliner market.
Unwell_Raptor is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.