Civil overflights Afghanistan... Risk?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: london
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Civil overflights Afghanistan... Risk?
According to Wikileaks the Taliban has surface to air missiles.The US has covered up this, even though some of their aircraft have been shot down by these missiles.
How safe are civil flights into Afghanistan?.
Are the overflights safe given the high terrain from which the missiles can be launched?.
How safe are civil flights into Afghanistan?.
Are the overflights safe given the high terrain from which the missiles can be launched?.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: エリア88
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How safe are civil flights into Afghanistan?.
The current UK guidelines are:
Air Travel
In May 2009, Safi Airways and in September 2009 Kam Air fulfilled the standards of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) and were officially certified to fly within EU airspace.
Ariana Airlines has been refused permission to operate services to the EU because it does not meet international safety standards. Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) employees are not allowed to travel on this airline in or out of Afghanistan.
Some other airlines that operate in and out of Afghanistan may not meet international safety standards.
On 17 May 2010, a Pamir Airways flight from Kunduz to Kabul crashed in the mountainous Shakardara area north of Kabul. The plane appears to have hit a mountain top during some unseasonably poor weather and in poor visibility. All 44 personnel on board were killed, including 3 British nationals.
In February 2005, a Kam Air Boeing 727-200 flying from Herat to Kabul crashed in snowstorms 17 miles out of Kabul. All 96 passengers and eight crew on board were killed in the incident.
In May 2009, Safi Airways and in September 2009 Kam Air fulfilled the standards of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) and were officially certified to fly within EU airspace.
Ariana Airlines has been refused permission to operate services to the EU because it does not meet international safety standards. Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) employees are not allowed to travel on this airline in or out of Afghanistan.
Some other airlines that operate in and out of Afghanistan may not meet international safety standards.
On 17 May 2010, a Pamir Airways flight from Kunduz to Kabul crashed in the mountainous Shakardara area north of Kabul. The plane appears to have hit a mountain top during some unseasonably poor weather and in poor visibility. All 44 personnel on board were killed, including 3 British nationals.
In February 2005, a Kam Air Boeing 727-200 flying from Herat to Kabul crashed in snowstorms 17 miles out of Kabul. All 96 passengers and eight crew on board were killed in the incident.
In regards to MANPADS, I haven't read the wikileaks documents but as I understand it, the threat comes from Stinger missiles (FIM-92's) which we're originally given to the Mujahideen during the Russian occupation, these have a range of about 16'000 feet so shouldn't be a realistic threat to overflights, even if they are firing them from the high-ground.
Another point that was told to me was that the Stingers batteries will probably not be reliable after all these years.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another point that was told to me was that the Stingers batteries will probably not be reliable after all these years.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: london
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What worries me is overflights of Afghanistan. If these missiles have a height range of 15000ft+ when fired from a 15000ft or higher mountain they are a big threat to overflights.
I wonder if some of the civil losses were shot down and covered up.
I wonder if some of the civil losses were shot down and covered up.
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Strela 3 maximum engagement altitude = ~2700-3000m (SA-14)
Strela 2 was less capable with an effective engagement altitude of ~1500m (SA-7)
- GY
Strela 2 was less capable with an effective engagement altitude of ~1500m (SA-7)
- GY
Last edited by GarageYears; 27th Jul 2010 at 19:08. Reason: Addition of common (western) type numbers
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: God's Country
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If it's stingers that are the threat (could be some other type), you're OK over FL150. The range and the ceiling are distinct.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: エリア88
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I personally feel the risk of overflights is low. However, all flights in Afganistan are operated at 'own risk', so if you as captain are not willing to accept these risks, then don't do it.
Afghanistan Ministry of Transport and Civil Aviation
Afghanistan Ministry of Transport and Civil Aviation
All operators are advised that non-military operations could be at significant risk because of ongoing military operations in Afghanistan. There are continuing reports of indiscriminate small arms and missile attacks on aircraft operating in Afghanistan, primarily at low altitudes. Therefore, operators that undertake flights within the Kabul FIR shall do so at their own risk.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the Taliban has surface to air missiles. The US has covered up this, even though some of their aircraft have been shot down by these missiles
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Patterson, NY
Age: 66
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It should come as absolutely no surprise that the Taliban have surface to air missiles (Stingers). Where do you suppose they got them?
They got them from the U.S. When the U.S. armed the Mujahedin against the then Soviet Union.
They got them from the U.S. When the U.S. armed the Mujahedin against the then Soviet Union.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and don't forget the SA-7s etc. The existance of these things is no secret.
AFAIR several of the military losses were attributed to MANPADs when reported to the press, and there is video out there of the other side using these things in anger. Not a very good 'cover-up'
Which ones do you have doubt over?
AFAIR several of the military losses were attributed to MANPADs when reported to the press, and there is video out there of the other side using these things in anger. Not a very good 'cover-up'
I wonder if some of the civil losses were shot down and covered up.
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toulouse
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think overflight is pretty much ok considering the capability of those small missiles. I'm not sure either that the guys would waste some trying to shoot airliners that you barely see when there is a lot of other potential military targets around... I'll always remember the cabin crew's faces when we went to Somalia in 1993(with french army)... We landed in Mogadiscio with a civil plane and landing there at a time was something ! I wish I could have been in the cockpit that day. But I was just 19 at the time, and not yet eaten by the flying virus !
