difference between VY and VX
Moderator
aahh ... any time you are on one in a lightie with a load and desirous of either not going down (if you are lucky) or going up (if you are very lucky) ... ?
Join Date: May 2005
Location: KUWAIT
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Climb at Maximum Gradient enables a given altitude to be achieved over the shortest distance.
while
Climbing at the maximum rate of climb speed enables a given altitude to be reached in the shortest time.
addtional to my message ,
Vy (best rate of climb speed ) is always little higher than Vx ( best climb gradient speed)
regards ,
kaepa
while
Climbing at the maximum rate of climb speed enables a given altitude to be reached in the shortest time.
addtional to my message ,
Vy (best rate of climb speed ) is always little higher than Vx ( best climb gradient speed)
regards ,
kaepa
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kagerplassen
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Best angle is used to clear obstacles, usually shortly after TO. You are not always clearing obstacles, therefore in other cases best rate (=shortest time) climbspeed to your altitude could be preferable.
Cheers,
P77
Cheers,
P77
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To take it one step further from Pegasus77, once clear of obstacles, Vy is definately the preferred option in terms of time, fuel, and cost. You will reach Cruise Altitude faster, and therefore use less fuel to get there, and, as Vy is a higher speed than Vx, cover a greater distance in that lesser time. Overall sector time will therefore be reduced, and fuel used will be less, both saving cost.
I presume that we're talking piston engines here, and a third benefit of climbing at the higher Vy speed will be reduced Cylinder Head Temperatures. That's a cost savings in the long run too.
Regards,
Old Smokey
I presume that we're talking piston engines here, and a third benefit of climbing at the higher Vy speed will be reduced Cylinder Head Temperatures. That's a cost savings in the long run too.
Regards,
Old Smokey
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vy is not a good speed if you want a tea from from the workers down the back! A deck angle of more than 5 degrees or so makes their lives (and then yours) more difficult than it needs to be.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: earth most of the time
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For a light twin, blue line is Vyse, best rate of climb single engine, alot of times close or similar to Vy.
The first red radial line is Vmc, the important twin thing. Has nothing to do with climb capabilities, or Vx/Vy etc.
On most light twins it is possible to climb out on Vx
There is a safety aspect to it though. Climbing with Vx gives you alot higher pitch, and a speed usually close to Vmc, or Vs.
So if you would loose one engine, you have to react alot quicker getting the nose down, which has to travel more down too, then for instance when you would be climbing at Vy(se) or higher.
and on the pedantic note, Vx and Vy contrary to stated above, can be the same. This will be the case at your absolute ceiling. (and by your, i mean the airplane's)
-IBLB-
The first red radial line is Vmc, the important twin thing. Has nothing to do with climb capabilities, or Vx/Vy etc.
On most light twins it is possible to climb out on Vx
There is a safety aspect to it though. Climbing with Vx gives you alot higher pitch, and a speed usually close to Vmc, or Vs.
So if you would loose one engine, you have to react alot quicker getting the nose down, which has to travel more down too, then for instance when you would be climbing at Vy(se) or higher.
and on the pedantic note, Vx and Vy contrary to stated above, can be the same. This will be the case at your absolute ceiling. (and by your, i mean the airplane's)
-IBLB-
Last edited by -IBLB-; 3rd Jun 2005 at 15:34.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Flying Fluffer,
Your quote -
My quote -
Ummm.....Isn't that what I said?
Regards,
Old Smokey
Your quote -
best rate will get you there in shortest amount of time
Vy is definately the preferred option in terms of time, fuel, and cost. You will reach Cruise Altitude faster, and therefore use less fuel to get there
Regards,
Old Smokey
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is perhaps a MUCH over-simplified explanation, but here goes.
Essentially all aircraft performance depends upon the 4 basic vectors, Weight, Drag, Lift, and Thrust. These may all be resolved geometrically, which, when there is an excess of thrust, yield a climb angle. Following on from this, all climb performance, when related to the 4 basic vectors indicate that all climb performance is at a particular angle, thus, the amount of excess thrust determines the climb angle.
If we want to take it to the next step, and find the rate of climb, then we must examine the rate of doing work, and,
Power is the Rate of doing work.
and also,
Power = Force (Thrust) X Velocity (TAS).
Therefore, to find the best RATE of climb, we must examine the best excess RATE of doing work, i.e. excess Power.
Regards,
Old Smokey
Essentially all aircraft performance depends upon the 4 basic vectors, Weight, Drag, Lift, and Thrust. These may all be resolved geometrically, which, when there is an excess of thrust, yield a climb angle. Following on from this, all climb performance, when related to the 4 basic vectors indicate that all climb performance is at a particular angle, thus, the amount of excess thrust determines the climb angle.
If we want to take it to the next step, and find the rate of climb, then we must examine the rate of doing work, and,
Power is the Rate of doing work.
and also,
Power = Force (Thrust) X Velocity (TAS).
Therefore, to find the best RATE of climb, we must examine the best excess RATE of doing work, i.e. excess Power.
Regards,
Old Smokey