The G-meter not installed in the 172 you'd like to use you mean? I've spent enough of my time with the Smart Aviation Poznan marketing department, have fun with your quality training.

Don't know what you're aiming at or how SA is relevant, but since you can't come up with any arguments you probably agree with what I've said.

This discussion is derailing the thread. I've tried to lay some perspective on using a non-aerobatic aircraft such as a C172/Katana/Pipestrel for AUPRT acc fcl745. I hope to have helped the ones looking for some info on the matter.

Why? because If I were in their shoes, I would've liked to know the other side of the medal. Before spending 2,5-3k on a-uprt in an E300, just because everyone is parrotting to do it in an aerob plane.
Even worse is that the ones who are the most vocal about it usually don't fly anything else than straight lines at 1G. Blind leading the blind.
I am not saying that you should not do it in an aerobatic plane either! just that it isn't strictly necessary to achieve your objective, especially if your're new to it.

That's it from my side, derail the rest of the thread as you wish

Hi guys! I have a question, maybe someone can help me.
I am finishing my conversion from ICAO to EASA ATPL. I have airline experience (CRJ and Boeing) but all my types are in the ICAO license.
Do I have to take de Advanced UPRT anyway? I know that is mandatory before your first type on the EASA license, but I already have type ratings (but not in the EASA one).
Thanks in advance!