PPRuNe Forums - ATPL appeal

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)

- Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) (https://www.pprune.org/professional-pilot-training-includes-ground-studies-14/)

- - ATPL appeal (https://www.pprune.org/professional-pilot-training-includes-ground-studies/609200-atpl-appeal.html)

Pablitos

23rd May 2018 08:16

ATPL appeal

Morning all.

In my last Instrumentation exam I got 73% (so I failed just for 1 question). There was a question about the function of an "asynchroscope in a twin-engine aircraft" so my idea was to appeal because it doesn't exist in the learning objectives any "asynchroscope" so it could lead to misunderstanding and confusion. Anyone could give me any tip about the appealing process I would really appreciate that and most important thing is...do you think is there any chance to win it?

Thanks in advance.

Piloto Maluco

23rd May 2018 23:41

Man,

I hope you've burned your exam by not thinking that it could have been just a mistyping from your CAA; like they just forgot a the space between "a" and "synchroscope" which results "a synchroscope"

Flyfede80

24th May 2018 05:59

Pablitos...you must appeal during the exams process, if you have any doubt about questions...not some days ago...did you signal this issue during the exam?in written form?

jamesgrainge

24th May 2018 07:32

Am I being harsh in thinking that regardless of one question, there was 25% of the exam the OP did not know. As much as I hate the ATPL syllabus for its irrelevance, one question wouldn't matter if you know 90% of the topic.

Officer Kite

24th May 2018 09:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesgrainge (Post 10155433)

im inclined to disagree, because otherwise then they should just raise the pass mark to 90% if that is the case. If the pass mark is set at 75% then it's unfair and illogical to say 'tough, you should have known the other 25% anyway' to the op. Especially considering the deviant nature of the examinations and questions.

parkfell

24th May 2018 09:18

A Groundschool provider is probably best placed to say whether this appeal has any merit?

Alex Whittingham

24th May 2018 11:39

We will appeal it, but don't hold your breath. Certainly there is no such thing as an asynchroscope in the LOs but they may argue that a 'scope' that indicates 'asynchronicity' is the same thing as a scope that indicates 'synchronicity'.

All times are GMT. The time now is 19:14.