![]() |
EASAs and the CAA
Has any present or past student of ANY Flight Training Organisation EVER known anyone who has queried his/her Phase 1 exam results and paid for a recheck that has been upheld?
I know two top people from the two top UK training schools who say that they have NEVER had the CAA admit to mis-marking an exam paper. It amazes me that the CAA don't have to return papers to the person or Flight Training College showing the re-marking - in fact you have no proof whatsoever that a paper has been remarked. I don't know of any other exam organisation that doesn't return the remarked paper to the student or training body. And a present complaint from the students at the two top UK schools appear to be that often the examination papers are copies-of-copies-of-copies and are often unable to read (especially where maps and charts are concerned). Any comments? |
The Annexes are apparently deliberately bad as this is the kind of quality you can expect from ops rooms around the world.
Phil |
Having completely redrawn CAPs 696, 697 and 698 for the CAA some years ago, they are now accurate and clear.
I offered to do all the Met annexes also, but my offer was rejected on the grounds of cost. My charges for all the CAPs was about a quarter of the quotes which they obtained !!!!!!! |
Yeah, I'm redrawing them for my own purposes at the moment.
Phil |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 14:15. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.